Financial - Capital Markets
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PLUT vs TIGR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
PLUT vs TIGR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $45M | $676M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10M | $392M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-10M | $118M |
| Gross Margin | -14.6% | 65.0% |
| Operating Margin | -74.2% | 35.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 7.3x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $180M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $31M | $394M |
PLUT vs TIGR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plutus Financial Gr… (PLUT) | 100 | 72.5 | -27.5% |
| UP Fintech Holding … (TIGR) | 100 | 95.7 | -4.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PLUT vs TIGR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PLUT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.77
- -27.0% 10Y total return vs TIGR's -35.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.77, Low D/E 3.9%, current ratio 4.16x
TIGR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 43.7%, EPS growth 71.4%
- 43.7% NII/revenue growth vs PLUT's -55.6%
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 43.7% NII/revenue growth vs PLUT's -55.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PLUT's 0.6% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.77 vs TIGR's 2.02, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +24.8% vs TIGR's -25.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PLUT's 0.6% |
PLUT vs TIGR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PLUT vs TIGR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TIGR leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TIGR is the larger business by revenue, generating $392M annually — 40.2x PLUT's $10M. TIGR is the more profitable business, keeping 15.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PLUT's -56.7%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10M | $392M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$12M | $225M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$10M | $118M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | $673M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -14.6% | +65.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -74.2% | +35.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -56.7% | +15.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -96.3% | +2.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.0% | +12.4% |
Valuation Metrics
TIGR leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $45M | $676M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $41M | $462M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -58.66x | 19.25x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.32x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 3.13x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 36.03x | 1.73x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.84x | 1.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 0.82x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TIGR leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TIGR delivers a 17.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-15 for PLUT. PLUT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TIGR's 0.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TIGR scores 6/9 vs PLUT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -14.8% | +17.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -11.3% | +1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -9.1% | +13.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -12.4% | +18.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.27x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$28M | -$214M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $31M | $394M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $180M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -48.68x | 3.26x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PLUT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PLUT five years ago would be worth $7,300 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,043 for TIGR. Over the past 12 months, PLUT leads with a +24.8% total return vs TIGR's -25.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TIGR at 33.7% vs PLUT's -10.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -11.0% | -33.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +24.8% | -25.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.0% | +139.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.0% | -59.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.0% | -35.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.0% | +33.7% |
Risk & Volatility
PLUT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PLUT is the less volatile stock with a 0.77 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TIGR's 2.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PLUT currently trades 69.7% from its 52-week high vs TIGR's 51.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.77x | 2.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.19 | $13.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.04 | $5.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.7% | +51.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.8 | 46.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4K | 2.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Sell |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $4.73 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
TIGR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PLUT leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
PLUT vs TIGR: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PLUT or TIGR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) is the stronger pick with 43. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -55. 6% for Plutus Financial Group Limited (PLUT). UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) offers the better valuation at 19. 3x trailing P/E (7. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) a "Sell" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — PLUT or TIGR?
Over the past 5 years, Plutus Financial Group Limited (PLUT) delivered a total return of -27.
0%, compared to -59. 6% for UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLUT returned -27. 0% versus TIGR's -35. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — PLUT or TIGR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Plutus Financial Group Limited (PLUT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
77β versus UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A's 2. 02β — meaning TIGR is approximately 161% more volatile than PLUT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Plutus Financial Group Limited (PLUT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 27% for UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — PLUT or TIGR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) is pulling ahead at 43. 7% versus -55. 6% for Plutus Financial Group Limited (PLUT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A grew EPS 71. 4% year-over-year, compared to 9. 3% for Plutus Financial Group Limited. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — PLUT or TIGR?
UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 5% net margin versus -56. 7% for Plutus Financial Group Limited — meaning it keeps 15. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TIGR leads at 35. 6% versus -74. 2% for PLUT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TIGR leads at 65. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — PLUT or TIGR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is PLUT or TIGR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Plutus Financial Group Limited (PLUT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
77)). UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) carries a higher beta of 2. 02 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PLUT: -27. 0%, TIGR: -35. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between PLUT and TIGR?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PLUT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TIGR is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.