Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PSFE vs PRTH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
PSFE vs PRTH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $479M | $431M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.70B | $953M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-183M | $56M |
| Gross Margin | 52.4% | 21.4% |
| Operating Margin | 5.6% | 14.8% |
| Forward P/E | 4.2x | 5.5x |
| Total Debt | $2.66B | $1.05B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.35B | $77M |
PSFE vs PRTH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paysafe Limited (PSFE) | 100 | 8.0 | -92.0% |
| Priority Technology… (PRTH) | 100 | 182.0 | +82.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PSFE vs PRTH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PSFE is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (4.2x vs 5.5x)
PRTH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 2.12
- Rev growth 8.3%, EPS growth 319.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.8%
- -46.3% 10Y total return vs PSFE's -92.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.3% revenue growth vs PSFE's -0.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.2x vs 5.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.8% margin vs PSFE's -10.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.12 vs PSFE's 2.35 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -23.8% vs PSFE's -38.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.6% ROA vs PSFE's -3.8%, ROIC 13.4% vs 3.6% |
PSFE vs PRTH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PSFE vs PRTH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRTH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PSFE is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.7B annually — 1.8x PRTH's $953M. PRTH is the more profitable business, keeping 5.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PSFE's -10.7%. On growth, PRTH holds the edge at +8.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.7B | $953M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $371M | $204M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$183M | $56M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $136M | $75M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.4% | +21.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.6% | +14.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -10.7% | +5.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.0% | +7.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.4% | +8.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -183.3% | +3.1% |
Valuation Metrics
PSFE leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, PSFE's 4.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PRTH's 6.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $479M | $431M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $1.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.95x | 7.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 4.24x | 5.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.52x | 6.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.28x | 0.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.82x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.14x | 5.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PRTH leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PRTH scores 6/9 vs PSFE's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -24.1% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.8% | +2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.6% | +13.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.6% | +16.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 4.06x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.3B | $969M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.3B | $77M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.7B | $1.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.84x | 1.51x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRTH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PRTH five years ago would be worth $8,092 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $605 for PSFE. Over the past 12 months, PRTH leads with a -23.8% total return vs PSFE's -38.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRTH at 12.8% vs PSFE's -13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.0% | -1.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -38.0% | -23.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.8% | +43.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.0% | -19.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.2% | -46.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.7% | +12.8% |
Risk & Volatility
PRTH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PRTH is the less volatile stock with a 2.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PSFE's 2.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRTH currently trades 59.2% from its 52-week high vs PSFE's 56.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.35x | 2.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.49 | $8.89 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.95 | $4.44 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +56.2% | +59.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.6 | 52.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 365K | 253K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PSFE as "Buy" and PRTH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 109.1% upside for PRTH (target: $11) vs 8.0% for PSFE (target: $10).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.00 | $11.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +21.2% | +2.4% |
PRTH leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PSFE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
PSFE vs PRTH: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PSFE or PRTH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.
(PRTH) is the stronger pick with 8. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 2% for Paysafe Limited (PSFE). Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (PRTH) offers the better valuation at 7. 7x trailing P/E (5. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Paysafe Limited (PSFE) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PSFE or PRTH?
On forward P/E, Paysafe Limited is actually cheaper at 4.
2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PSFE or PRTH?
Over the past 5 years, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.
(PRTH) delivered a total return of -19. 1%, compared to -94. 0% for Paysafe Limited (PSFE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PRTH returned -46. 3% versus PSFE's -92. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PSFE or PRTH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.
(PRTH) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 12β versus Paysafe Limited's 2. 35β — meaning PSFE is approximately 11% more volatile than PRTH relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — PSFE or PRTH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.
(PRTH) is pulling ahead at 8. 3% versus -0. 2% for Paysafe Limited (PSFE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 319. 4% year-over-year, compared to -972. 2% for Paysafe Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, PRTH leads at 12. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PSFE or PRTH?
Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.
(PRTH) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 8% net margin versus -10. 7% for Paysafe Limited — meaning it keeps 5. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRTH leads at 14. 8% versus 7. 2% for PSFE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PSFE leads at 40. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PSFE or PRTH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Paysafe Limited (PSFE) trades at 4.
2x forward P/E versus 5. 5x for Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. — 1. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRTH: 109. 1% to $11. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PSFE or PRTH?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is PSFE or PRTH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.
(PRTH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Paysafe Limited (PSFE) carries a higher beta of 2. 35 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PRTH: -46. 3%, PSFE: -92. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PSFE and PRTH?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PSFE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRTH is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.