Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PSIX vs GNRC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
PSIX vs GNRC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $1.72B | $15.69B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $531M | $4.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $114M | $189M |
| Gross Margin | 34.8% | 38.1% |
| Operating Margin | 20.7% | 7.5% |
| Forward P/E | 15.6x | 31.0x |
| Total Debt | $152M | $1.33B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $41M | $341M |
PSIX vs GNRC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power Solutions Int… (PSIX) | 100 | 1551.9 | +1451.9% |
| Generac Holdings In… (GNRC) | 100 | 240.3 | +140.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PSIX vs GNRC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PSIX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (15.6x vs 31.0x)
- 21.5% margin vs GNRC's 4.4%
- +182.4% vs GNRC's +135.1%
GNRC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.69, yield 0.0%
- Rev growth -2.0%, EPS growth -50.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -2.7%
- 6.7% 10Y total return vs PSIX's 5.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -2.0% revenue growth vs PSIX's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.6x vs 31.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.5% margin vs GNRC's 4.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.69 vs PSIX's 3.33, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +182.4% vs GNRC's +135.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.9% ROA vs GNRC's 3.4%, ROIC 36.9% vs 5.9% |
PSIX vs GNRC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PSIX vs GNRC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GNRC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GNRC is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.3B annually — 8.1x PSIX's $531M. PSIX is the more profitable business, keeping 21.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GNRC's 4.4%. On growth, GNRC holds the edge at +12.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $531M | $4.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $115M | $472M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $114M | $189M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4M | $419M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.8% | +38.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.7% | +7.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.5% | +4.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.8% | +9.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +12.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -30.7% | +69.9% |
Valuation Metrics
PSIX leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.1x trailing earnings, PSIX trades at a 85% valuation discount to GNRC's 99.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PSIX's 15.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GNRC's 34.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $15.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $16.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.08x | 99.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.64x | 30.99x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.88x | 34.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 3.73x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9.62x | 6.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 121.38x | 58.52x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PSIX leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PSIX delivers a 81.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $81 in annual profit, vs $7 for GNRC. GNRC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.51x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PSIX's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GNRC scores 6/9 vs PSIX's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +81.3% | +7.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +26.9% | +3.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +36.9% | +5.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +50.7% | +6.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.85x | 0.51x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $111M | $992M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $41M | $341M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $152M | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 13.09x | 4.54x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PSIX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PSIX five years ago would be worth $121,122 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,405 for GNRC. Over the past 12 months, PSIX leads with a +182.4% total return vs GNRC's +135.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PSIX at 193.4% vs GNRC's 34.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.1% | +89.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +182.4% | +135.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2425.1% | +142.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1111.2% | -15.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +575.3% | +668.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +193.4% | +34.3% |
Risk & Volatility
GNRC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GNRC is the less volatile stock with a 1.69 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PSIX's 3.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GNRC currently trades 99.3% from its 52-week high vs PSIX's 61.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.33x | 1.69x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $121.78 | $269.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $25.09 | $113.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.2% | +99.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.9 | 76.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 621K | 902K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PSIX as "Buy" and GNRC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 40.0% upside for PSIX (target: $104) vs 1.4% for GNRC (target: $271).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $104.26 | $271.22 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 39 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.9% |
PSIX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). GNRC leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility).
PSIX vs GNRC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PSIX or GNRC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Generac Holdings Inc.
(GNRC) is the stronger pick with -2. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Power Solutions International, Inc. (PSIX). Power Solutions International, Inc. (PSIX) offers the better valuation at 15. 1x trailing P/E (15. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Power Solutions International, Inc. (PSIX) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PSIX or GNRC?
On trailing P/E, Power Solutions International, Inc.
(PSIX) is the cheapest at 15. 1x versus Generac Holdings Inc. at 99. 4x. On forward P/E, Power Solutions International, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PSIX or GNRC?
Over the past 5 years, Power Solutions International, Inc.
(PSIX) delivered a total return of +1111%, compared to -15. 9% for Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GNRC returned +668. 7% versus PSIX's +575. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PSIX or GNRC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Generac Holdings Inc.
(GNRC) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 69β versus Power Solutions International, Inc. 's 3. 33β — meaning PSIX is approximately 96% more volatile than GNRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 51% versus 85% for Power Solutions International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PSIX or GNRC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Generac Holdings Inc.
(GNRC) is pulling ahead at -2. 0% versus -100. 0% for Power Solutions International, Inc. (PSIX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Power Solutions International, Inc. grew EPS 64. 1% year-over-year, compared to -50. 1% for Generac Holdings Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PSIX or GNRC?
Power Solutions International, Inc.
(PSIX) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 5% net margin versus 3. 8% for Generac Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PSIX leads at 20. 7% versus 6. 9% for GNRC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GNRC leads at 38. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PSIX or GNRC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Power Solutions International, Inc.
(PSIX) trades at 15. 6x forward P/E versus 31. 0x for Generac Holdings Inc. — 15. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PSIX: 40. 0% to $104. 26.
08Which pays a better dividend — PSIX or GNRC?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is PSIX or GNRC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Generac Holdings Inc.
(GNRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+668. 7% 10Y return). Power Solutions International, Inc. (PSIX) carries a higher beta of 3. 33 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GNRC: +668. 7%, PSIX: +575. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PSIX and GNRC?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PSIX is a small-cap deep-value stock; GNRC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.