Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
PUMP vs LBRT vs ACDC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
PUMP vs LBRT vs ACDC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $1.93B | $5.26B | $1.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.18B | $4.05B | $1.94B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-12M | $150M | $-367M |
| Gross Margin | 8.3% | 10.7% | 3.7% |
| Operating Margin | -1.1% | 1.5% | -8.5% |
| Forward P/E | 2021.8x | 3568.1x | — |
| Total Debt | $249M | $873M | $1.14B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $91M | $28M | $23M |
PUMP vs LBRT vs ACDC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ProPetro Holding Co… (PUMP) | 100 | 120.8 | +20.8% |
| Liberty Energy Inc. (LBRT) | 100 | 199.6 | +99.6% |
| ProFrac Holding Cor… (ACDC) | 100 | 39.1 | -60.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PUMP vs LBRT vs ACDC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PUMP is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.12, Low D/E 30.0%, current ratio 1.29x
- Beta 1.12, current ratio 1.29x
- Better valuation composite
LBRT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -7.2%, EPS growth -52.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.2%
- 98.8% 10Y total return vs PUMP's 8.8%
- -7.2% revenue growth vs PUMP's -12.1%
ACDC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- beta 0.83
- Beta 0.83 vs LBRT's 1.31
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -7.2% revenue growth vs PUMP's -12.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.7% margin vs ACDC's -18.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs LBRT's 1.31 | |
| Dividends | 1.0% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +199.8% vs ACDC's +56.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.0% ROA vs ACDC's -13.1%, ROIC 2.3% vs -4.6% |
PUMP vs LBRT vs ACDC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PUMP vs LBRT vs ACDC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LBRT leads in 3 of 6 categories
ACDC leads 1 • PUMP leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LBRT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LBRT is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.0B annually — 3.4x PUMP's $1.2B. LBRT is the more profitable business, keeping 3.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACDC's -18.9%. On growth, LBRT holds the edge at +4.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $4.0B | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $154M | $549M | $251M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$12M | $150M | -$367M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$11M | -$193M | $20M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +8.3% | +10.7% | +3.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.1% | +1.5% | -8.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.1% | +3.7% | -18.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.9% | -4.8% | +1.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -24.7% | +4.5% | -4.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -134.2% | +16.7% | -33.3% |
Valuation Metrics
ACDC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 36.5x trailing earnings, LBRT trades at a 98% valuation discount to PUMP's 2021.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ACDC's 8.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PUMP's 10.8x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.9B | $5.3B | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.1B | $6.1B | $2.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2021.79x | 36.48x | -3.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 3568.13x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.81x | 10.50x | 8.54x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.52x | 1.31x | 0.66x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.00x | 2.59x | 1.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 45.52x | 373.05x | 65.81x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LBRT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LBRT delivers a 7.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-38 for ACDC. PUMP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ACDC's 1.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PUMP scores 5/9 vs ACDC's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -1.4% | +7.4% | -38.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.0% | +4.0% | -13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.4% | +2.3% | -4.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.8% | +3.0% | -6.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.30x | 0.42x | 1.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $158M | $846M | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $91M | $28M | $23M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $249M | $873M | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.86x | 5.24x | -1.22x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LBRT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LBRT five years ago would be worth $25,534 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,937 for ACDC. Over the past 12 months, PUMP leads with a +199.8% total return vs ACDC's +56.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LBRT at 39.7% vs ACDC's -11.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +60.6% | +72.5% | +76.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +199.8% | +193.5% | +56.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +136.1% | +172.7% | -30.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.8% | +155.3% | -60.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.8% | +98.8% | -60.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +33.2% | +39.7% | -11.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LBRT and ACDC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACDC is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LBRT's 1.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LBRT currently trades 94.3% from its 52-week high vs ACDC's 66.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.12x | 1.31x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.50 | $34.41 | $10.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.51 | $9.90 | $3.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.2% | +94.3% | +66.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.3 | 66.4 | 63.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.5M | 4.2M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PUMP as "Buy", LBRT as "Buy", ACDC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 4.7% upside for LBRT (target: $34) vs -15.8% for ACDC (target: $6). LBRT is the only dividend payer here at 1.01% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.75 | $34.00 | $6.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 30 | 19 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 4 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.33 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.5% | 0.0% |
LBRT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ACDC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
PUMP vs LBRT vs ACDC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PUMP or LBRT or ACDC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Liberty Energy Inc.
(LBRT) is the stronger pick with -7. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 1% for ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP). Liberty Energy Inc. (LBRT) offers the better valuation at 36. 5x trailing P/E (3568. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) a "Buy" — based on 30 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PUMP or LBRT or ACDC?
On trailing P/E, Liberty Energy Inc.
(LBRT) is the cheapest at 36. 5x versus ProPetro Holding Corp. at 2021. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PUMP or LBRT or ACDC?
Over the past 5 years, Liberty Energy Inc.
(LBRT) delivered a total return of +155. 3%, compared to -60. 6% for ProFrac Holding Corp. (ACDC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LBRT returned +98. 8% versus ACDC's -60. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PUMP or LBRT or ACDC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ProFrac Holding Corp.
(ACDC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 83β versus Liberty Energy Inc. 's 1. 31β — meaning LBRT is approximately 59% more volatile than ACDC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 130% for ProFrac Holding Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PUMP or LBRT or ACDC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Liberty Energy Inc.
(LBRT) is pulling ahead at -7. 2% versus -12. 1% for ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ProPetro Holding Corp. grew EPS 100. 6% year-over-year, compared to -66. 7% for ProFrac Holding Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PUMP leads at -0. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PUMP or LBRT or ACDC?
Liberty Energy Inc.
(LBRT) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 7% net margin versus -19. 0% for ProFrac Holding Corp. — meaning it keeps 3. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LBRT leads at 2. 0% versus -6. 9% for ACDC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LBRT leads at 11. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PUMP or LBRT or ACDC more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LBRT: 4.
7% to $34. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PUMP or LBRT or ACDC?
In this comparison, LBRT (1.
0% yield) pays a dividend. PUMP, ACDC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PUMP or LBRT or ACDC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Liberty Energy Inc.
(LBRT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LBRT: +98. 8%, PUMP: +8. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PUMP and LBRT and ACDC?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
LBRT pays a dividend while PUMP, ACDC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.