PWP vs MC

For growth investors, Moelis & Company (MC) is the stronger pick with 27.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 5% for Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP). Moelis & Company (MC) offers the better valuation at 21. 6x trailing P/E (20. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Moelis & Company (MC) is the cheapest at 21.

6x versus Perella Weinberg Partners at 35. 6x. On forward P/E, Perella Weinberg Partners is actually cheaper at 17. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP) delivered a total return of +79.

6%, compared to +44. 3% for Moelis & Company (MC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MC returned +260. 6% versus PWP's +111. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Moelis & Company (MC) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

75β versus Perella Weinberg Partners's 1. 85β — meaning PWP is approximately 6% more volatile than MC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Moelis & Company (MC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 39% versus 136% for Perella Weinberg Partners — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Moelis & Company (MC) is pulling ahead at 27.

0% versus -14. 5% for Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Perella Weinberg Partners grew EPS 145. 1% year-over-year, compared to 65. 2% for Moelis & Company. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Moelis & Company (MC) is the more profitable company, earning 15.

4% net margin versus 4. 7% for Perella Weinberg Partners — meaning it keeps 15. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MC leads at 18. 1% versus 6. 4% for PWP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MC leads at 99. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP) trades at 17.

7x forward P/E versus 20. 7x for Moelis & Company — 3. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MC: 15. 6% to $73. 40.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Moelis & Company (MC) offers the highest yield at 4. 1%, versus 1. 8% for Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Moelis & Company (MC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (4.

1% yield, +260. 6% 10Y return). Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MC: +260. 6%, PWP: +111. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: PWP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MC is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.