Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
QGEN vs EXAS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
QGEN vs EXAS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $7.10B | $20.02B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.09B | $3.25B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $425M | $-208M |
| Gross Margin | 61.8% | 69.7% |
| Operating Margin | 24.9% | -6.4% |
| Forward P/E | 13.8x | 582.8x |
| Total Debt | $1.65B | $2.52B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $839M | $956M |
QGEN vs EXAS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qiagen N.V. (QGEN) | 100 | 74.2 | -25.8% |
| Exact Sciences Corp… (EXAS) | 100 | 120.4 | +20.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: QGEN vs EXAS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
QGEN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.42, Low D/E 43.8%, current ratio 3.90x
- Lower P/E (13.8x vs 582.8x)
- 20.3% margin vs EXAS's -6.4%
EXAS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.12
- Rev growth 17.7%, EPS growth 80.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.9%
- 16.7% 10Y total return vs QGEN's 70.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 17.7% revenue growth vs QGEN's 5.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.8x vs 582.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.3% margin vs EXAS's -6.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs QGEN's 0.42 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +94.3% vs QGEN's -12.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.0% ROA vs EXAS's -3.5%, ROIC 8.6% vs -3.6% |
QGEN vs EXAS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
QGEN vs EXAS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — QGEN and EXAS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EXAS is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 1.6x QGEN's $2.1B. QGEN is the more profitable business, keeping 20.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EXAS's -6.4%. On growth, EXAS holds the edge at +23.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.1B | $3.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $714M | -$41M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $425M | -$208M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $453M | $357M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.8% | +69.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.9% | -6.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.3% | -6.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.7% | +11.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.7% | +23.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +26.8% | +90.4% |
Valuation Metrics
QGEN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.1B | $20.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.9B | $21.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.89x | -95.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.79x | 582.83x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.38x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.09x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.40x | 6.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.90x | 8.24x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.67x | 56.10x |
Profitability & Efficiency
QGEN leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
QGEN delivers a 11.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-9 for EXAS. QGEN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.44x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EXAS's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), QGEN scores 8/9 vs EXAS's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.9% | -8.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.0% | -3.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.6% | -3.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.5% | -4.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.44x | 1.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $815M | $1.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $839M | $956M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.7B | $2.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 15.74x | -5.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EXAS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EXAS five years ago would be worth $9,713 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,838 for QGEN. Over the past 12 months, EXAS leads with a +94.3% total return vs QGEN's -12.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EXAS at 15.2% vs QGEN's -6.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -18.7% | +3.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -12.3% | +94.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -18.8% | +53.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.6% | -2.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +70.4% | +1672.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -6.7% | +15.2% |
Risk & Volatility
EXAS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EXAS is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than QGEN's 0.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EXAS currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs QGEN's 59.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.42x | 0.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $57.82 | $104.98 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.17 | $38.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +59.6% | +99.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 25.7 | 76.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.9M | 4.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates QGEN as "Hold" and EXAS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 37.8% upside for QGEN (target: $48) vs -1.6% for EXAS (target: $103). QGEN is the only dividend payer here at 0.76% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $47.50 | $103.18 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.26 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.3% | +0.1% |
QGEN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). EXAS leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
QGEN vs EXAS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is QGEN or EXAS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Exact Sciences Corporation (EXAS) is the stronger pick with 17.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 7% for Qiagen N. V. (QGEN). Qiagen N. V. (QGEN) offers the better valuation at 16. 9x trailing P/E (13. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Exact Sciences Corporation (EXAS) a "Buy" — based on 41 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — QGEN or EXAS?
On forward P/E, Qiagen N.
V. is actually cheaper at 13. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — QGEN or EXAS?
Over the past 5 years, Exact Sciences Corporation (EXAS) delivered a total return of -2.
9%, compared to -21. 6% for Qiagen N. V. (QGEN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EXAS returned +1672% versus QGEN's +70. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — QGEN or EXAS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Exact Sciences Corporation (EXAS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
12β versus Qiagen N. V. 's 0. 42β — meaning QGEN is approximately 246% more volatile than EXAS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Qiagen N. V. (QGEN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 44% versus 105% for Exact Sciences Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — QGEN or EXAS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Exact Sciences Corporation (EXAS) is pulling ahead at 17.
7% versus 5. 7% for Qiagen N. V. (QGEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Qiagen N. V. grew EPS 436. 8% year-over-year, compared to 80. 3% for Exact Sciences Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, EXAS leads at 15. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — QGEN or EXAS?
Qiagen N.
V. (QGEN) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 3% net margin versus -6. 4% for Exact Sciences Corporation — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: QGEN leads at 24. 9% versus -6. 4% for EXAS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EXAS leads at 69. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is QGEN or EXAS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Qiagen N.
V. (QGEN) trades at 13. 8x forward P/E versus 582. 8x for Exact Sciences Corporation — 569. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for QGEN: 37. 8% to $47. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — QGEN or EXAS?
In this comparison, QGEN (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. EXAS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is QGEN or EXAS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Exact Sciences Corporation (EXAS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
12), +1672% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EXAS: +1672%, QGEN: +70. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between QGEN and EXAS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: QGEN is a small-cap deep-value stock; EXAS is a mid-cap high-growth stock. QGEN pays a dividend while EXAS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.