Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
QNCX vs FOLD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
QNCX vs FOLD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $7M | $4.55B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $634M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-84M | $-27M |
| Gross Margin | — | 87.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | 5.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 40.6x |
| Total Debt | $18M | $483M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $214M |
QNCX vs FOLD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quince Therapeutics… (QNCX) | 100 | 0.3 | -99.7% |
| Amicus Therapeutics… (FOLD) | 100 | 115.9 | +15.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: QNCX vs FOLD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
QNCX is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 1.3% margin vs FOLD's -4.3%
FOLD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.63
- Rev growth 20.0%, EPS growth 51.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.4%
- 119.2% 10Y total return vs QNCX's -99.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.0% revenue growth vs QNCX's -48.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.3% margin vs FOLD's -4.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.63 vs QNCX's 2.23 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +137.9% vs QNCX's -87.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -3.2% ROA vs QNCX's -78.5%, ROIC 5.3% vs -485.6% |
QNCX vs FOLD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FOLD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FOLD and QNCX operate at a comparable scale, with $634M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $634M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$50M | $40M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$84M | -$27M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$48M | $30M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +87.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +5.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -4.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +4.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +23.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -167.9% | -89.0% |
Valuation Metrics
FOLD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7M | $4.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $20M | $4.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.08x | -164.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 40.62x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 114.88x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 7.17x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 16.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 152.43x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FOLD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FOLD scores 4/9 vs QNCX's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -12.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -78.5% | -3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.9% | +5.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -64.0% | +5.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.76x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $13M | $269M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $214M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $18M | $483M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 1.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FOLD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FOLD five years ago would be worth $14,862 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $35 for QNCX. Over the past 12 months, FOLD leads with a +137.9% total return vs QNCX's -87.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FOLD at 6.0% vs QNCX's -57.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -95.7% | +1.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -87.5% | +137.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.0% | +19.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | +48.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | +119.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -57.0% | +6.0% |
Risk & Volatility
FOLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FOLD is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than QNCX's 2.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FOLD currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs QNCX's 2.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.25x | 0.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $45.50 | $14.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.80 | $5.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +2.9% | +99.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.6 | 72.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 49.5M | 3.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $14.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
FOLD leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics.
QNCX vs FOLD: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is QNCX or FOLD a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
(FOLD) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — QNCX or FOLD?
Over the past 5 years, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
(FOLD) delivered a total return of +48. 6%, compared to -99. 6% for Quince Therapeutics, Inc. (QNCX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FOLD returned +119. 2% versus QNCX's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — QNCX or FOLD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
(FOLD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 61β versus Quince Therapeutics, Inc. 's 2. 25β — meaning QNCX is approximately 268% more volatile than FOLD relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — QNCX or FOLD?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
grew EPS 51. 2% year-over-year, compared to -28. 2% for Quince Therapeutics, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — QNCX or FOLD?
Quince Therapeutics, Inc.
(QNCX) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -4. 3% for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FOLD leads at 5. 4% versus 0. 0% for QNCX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FOLD leads at 87. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — QNCX or FOLD?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is QNCX or FOLD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
(FOLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 61), +119. 2% 10Y return). Quince Therapeutics, Inc. (QNCX) carries a higher beta of 2. 25 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FOLD: +119. 2%, QNCX: -99. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between QNCX and FOLD?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: QNCX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FOLD is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.