Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
RAPT vs PRAX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
RAPT vs PRAX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $296M | $7.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-106M | $-303M |
| Total Debt | $4M | $110K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $170M | $357M |
RAPT vs PRAX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| RAPT Therapeutics, … (RAPT) | 100 | 25.2 | -74.8% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 64.1 | -35.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RAPT vs PRAX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RAPT has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.60
- EPS growth -4.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.60, Low D/E 2.4%, current ratio 4.87x
PRAX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -19.0% 10Y total return vs RAPT's -44.2%
- +8.6% vs RAPT's +7.9%
- -53.5% ROA vs RAPT's -54.7%, ROIC -65.0% vs -155.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.5% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.60 vs PRAX's 1.55 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.6% vs RAPT's +7.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -53.5% ROA vs RAPT's -54.7%, ROIC -65.0% vs -155.7% |
RAPT vs PRAX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
RAPT vs PRAX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RAPT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RAPT and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $0 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$112M | -$326M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$106M | -$303M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$87M | -$249M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +82.9% | -19.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — RAPT and PRAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $296M | $7.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $130M | $7.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.28x | -25.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.56x | 8.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
PRAX leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PRAX delivers a -58.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-59 in annual profit, vs $-62 for RAPT. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RAPT's 0.02x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PRAX scores 3/9 vs RAPT's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -61.8% | -58.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -54.7% | -53.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -155.7% | -65.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -79.3% | -49.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$165M | -$357M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $170M | $357M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $110,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PRAX five years ago would be worth $8,157 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,463 for RAPT. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +860.9% total return vs RAPT's +792.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 176.1% vs RAPT's -27.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +82.1% | +18.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +792.4% | +860.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -61.7% | +2005.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.4% | -18.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.2% | -19.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -27.4% | +176.1% |
Risk & Volatility
RAPT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RAPT is the less volatile stock with a 0.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRAX's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RAPT currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs PRAX's 94.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.60x | 1.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $58.02 | $356.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.67 | $34.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +100.0% | +94.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 78.9 | 53.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.9M | 376K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates RAPT as "Hold" and PRAX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 61.1% upside for PRAX (target: $544) vs -0.0% for RAPT (target: $58).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $58.00 | $544.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
RAPT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). PRAX leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
RAPT vs PRAX: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RAPT or PRAX a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
(PRAX) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — RAPT or PRAX?
Over the past 5 years, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
(PRAX) delivered a total return of -18. 4%, compared to -65. 4% for RAPT Therapeutics, Inc. (RAPT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PRAX returned -19. 0% versus RAPT's -44. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — RAPT or PRAX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), RAPT Therapeutics, Inc.
(RAPT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 60β versus Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. 's 1. 55β — meaning PRAX is approximately 158% more volatile than RAPT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for RAPT Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — RAPT or PRAX?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: RAPT Therapeutics, Inc.
grew EPS -4. 6% year-over-year, compared to -32. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — RAPT or PRAX?
RAPT Therapeutics, Inc.
(RAPT) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus 0. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RAPT leads at 0. 0% versus 0. 0% for PRAX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RAPT leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — RAPT or PRAX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is RAPT or PRAX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, RAPT Therapeutics, Inc.
(RAPT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 60)). Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RAPT: -44. 2%, PRAX: -19. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between RAPT and PRAX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.