Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
RNXT vs CRIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
RNXT vs CRIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $32M | $76M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $928K | $9M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $-8M |
| Gross Margin | 67.8% | 99.5% |
| Operating Margin | -12.5% | -348.4% |
| Total Debt | $278K | $2M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $5M |
RNXT vs CRIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenovoRx, Inc. (RNXT) | 100 | 8.6 | -91.4% |
| Curis, Inc. (CRIS) | 100 | 0.3 | -99.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RNXT vs CRIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RNXT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.18
- -87.9% 10Y total return vs CRIS's -99.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.18, Low D/E 6.2%, current ratio 4.10x
CRIS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth -13.4%, EPS growth 91.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -2.4%
- -80.3% margin vs RNXT's -12.0%
- -26.1% ROA vs RNXT's -99.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 46.2% revenue growth vs CRIS's -13.4% | |
| Quality / Margins | -80.3% margin vs RNXT's -12.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.18 vs CRIS's 1.87, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -17.0% vs CRIS's -72.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -26.1% ROA vs RNXT's -99.1% |
RNXT vs CRIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RNXT vs CRIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRIS leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $9M annually — 10.2x RNXT's $928,000. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -80.3% (CRIS) to -12.0% (RNXT).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $928,000 | $9M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$9M | -$33M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | -$8M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | -$27M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.8% | +99.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -12.5% | -3.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -12.0% | -80.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -11.2% | -2.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -66.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.3% | +198.4% |
Valuation Metrics
RNXT leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $32M | $76M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $25M | $73M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.38x | -0.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 750.13x | 8.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.64x | 13.91x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
RNXT leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RNXT delivers a -137.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-137 in annual profit, vs $-139 for CRIS. RNXT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CRIS's 0.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RNXT scores 5/9 vs CRIS's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -137.5% | -138.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -99.1% | -26.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.4% | -2.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$7M | -$3M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $5M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $278,000 | $2M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -107.35x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RNXT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RNXT five years ago would be worth $1,212 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $28 for CRIS. Over the past 12 months, RNXT leads with a -17.0% total return vs CRIS's -72.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RNXT at -31.8% vs CRIS's -67.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.4% | -41.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -17.0% | -72.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -68.2% | -96.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.9% | -99.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.9% | -99.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -31.8% | -67.0% |
Risk & Volatility
RNXT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RNXT is the less volatile stock with a 1.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CRIS's 1.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RNXT currently trades 60.7% from its 52-week high vs CRIS's 18.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.17x | 1.92x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.45 | $3.13 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.70 | $0.49 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +60.7% | +18.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.0 | 48.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 379K | 444K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
RNXT leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CRIS leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow).
RNXT vs CRIS: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Which is the better long-term investment — RNXT or CRIS?
Over the past 5 years, RenovoRx, Inc.
(RNXT) delivered a total return of -87. 9%, compared to -99. 7% for Curis, Inc. (CRIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RNXT returned -88. 1% versus CRIS's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
02Which is safer — RNXT or CRIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), RenovoRx, Inc.
(RNXT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 17β versus Curis, Inc. 's 1. 92β — meaning CRIS is approximately 64% more volatile than RNXT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, RenovoRx, Inc. (RNXT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 30% for Curis, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
03Which is growing faster — RNXT or CRIS?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Curis, Inc.
grew EPS 91. 6% year-over-year, compared to 26. 0% for RenovoRx, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
04Which has better profit margins — RNXT or CRIS?
Curis, Inc.
(CRIS) is the more profitable company, earning -80. 3% net margin versus -205. 0% for RenovoRx, Inc. — meaning it keeps -80. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CRIS leads at -348. 4% versus -255. 1% for RNXT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RNXT leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — RNXT or CRIS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is RNXT or CRIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, RenovoRx, Inc.
(RNXT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 17)). Curis, Inc. (CRIS) carries a higher beta of 1. 92 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RNXT: -88. 1%, CRIS: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between RNXT and CRIS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.