Compare Stocks

3 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SAVA vs ACAD vs PRAX

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SAVA
Cassava Sciences, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$94M
5Y Perf.+67.1%
ACAD
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.86B
5Y Perf.-47.1%
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$9.63B
5Y Perf.-35.9%

SAVA vs ACAD vs PRAX — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SAVA logoSAVA
ACAD logoACAD
PRAX logoPRAX
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$94M$3.86B$9.63B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$1.10B$-92K
Net Income (TTM)$-106M$376M$-327M
Gross Margin91.5%
Operating Margin7.4%
Forward P/E50.9x
Total Debt$0.00$52M$110K
Cash & Equiv.$129M$178M$357M

SAVA vs ACAD vs PRAXLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SAVA
ACAD
PRAX
StockOct 20Mar 26Return
Cassava Sciences, I… (SAVA)100167.1+67.1%
ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD)10052.9-47.1%
Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX)10064.1-35.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SAVA vs ACAD vs PRAX

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ACAD leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SAVA
Cassava Sciences, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

SAVA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • -19.5% 10Y total return vs PRAX's -20.1%
Best for: long-term compounding
ACAD
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
The Income Pick

ACAD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • beta 1.26
  • Rev growth 11.9%, EPS growth 68.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.5%
  • Beta 1.26, current ratio 3.83x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

PRAX is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.55, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 10.22x
  • +7.7% vs SAVA's +25.3%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthACAD logoACAD11.9% revenue growth vs SAVA's -5.4%
Quality / MarginsACAD logoACAD34.3% margin vs PRAX's 2.4%
Stability / SafetyACAD logoACADBeta 1.26 vs SAVA's 2.02
DividendsTieNone of these 3 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)PRAX logoPRAX+7.7% vs SAVA's +25.3%
Efficiency (ROA)ACAD logoACAD26.2% ROA vs SAVA's -75.3%, ROIC 10.0% vs -6.3%

SAVA vs ACAD vs PRAX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SAVACassava Sciences, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ACADACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
FY 2018
Product
100.0%$224M
PRAXPraxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
FY 2024
License
76.8%$9M
Upfront Payment
23.2%$3M

SAVA vs ACAD vs PRAX — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSAVALAGGINGPRAX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

SAVA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

ACAD and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $1.1B and -$92,000 in trailing revenue.

MetricSAVA logoSAVACassava Sciences,…ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$1.1B-$92,000
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$110M$96M-$357M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$106M$376M-$327M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$84M$212M-$283M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+91.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+7.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+34.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+19.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+9.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+62.1%-81.8%+2.7%
SAVA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — SAVA and PRAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
MetricSAVA logoSAVACassava Sciences,…ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
Market CapShares × price$94M$3.9B$9.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$34M$3.7B$9.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-3.76x9.85x-24.72x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.50.91x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple26.91x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.61x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.63x3.15x8.54x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF36.74x
Evenly matched — SAVA and PRAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ACAD leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.

ACAD delivers a 35.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-96 for SAVA. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ACAD's 0.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACAD scores 6/9 vs SAVA's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricSAVA logoSAVACassava Sciences,…ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-95.8%+35.6%-43.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-75.3%+26.2%-40.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-6.3%+10.0%-65.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-99.9%+10.1%-49.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9263
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.04x0.00x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$129M-$126M-$357M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$129M$178M$357M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$52M$110,000
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense
ACAD leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PRAX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ACAD five years ago would be worth $10,710 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,302 for SAVA. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +775.0% total return vs SAVA's +25.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.9% vs SAVA's -16.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSAVA logoSAVACassava Sciences,…ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-6.5%-13.7%+16.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+25.3%+52.4%+775.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-40.8%+4.7%+1976.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-67.0%+7.1%-20.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-19.5%-22.9%-20.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-16.0%+1.5%+174.9%
PRAX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — ACAD and PRAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ACAD is the less volatile stock with a 1.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SAVA's 2.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAX currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs SAVA's 39.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSAVA logoSAVACassava Sciences,…ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.02x1.26x1.55x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$4.98$27.81$356.00
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.51$14.45$35.18
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+39.3%+81.1%+93.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10046.844.255.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded712K1.8M378K
Evenly matched — ACAD and PRAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: SAVA as "Buy", ACAD as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 63.3% upside for PRAX (target: $544) vs 54.1% for ACAD (target: $35).

MetricSAVA logoSAVACassava Sciences,…ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$34.78$544.40
# AnalystsCovering analysts123716
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

SAVA leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). ACAD leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.

Best OverallCassava Sciences, Inc. (SAVA)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SAVA vs ACAD vs PRAX: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SAVA or ACAD or PRAX a better buy right now?

For growth investors, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

(ACAD) is the stronger pick with 11. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) offers the better valuation at 9. 9x trailing P/E (50. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cassava Sciences, Inc. (SAVA) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — SAVA or ACAD or PRAX?

Over the past 5 years, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

(ACAD) delivered a total return of +7. 1%, compared to -67. 0% for Cassava Sciences, Inc. (SAVA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SAVA returned -19. 5% versus ACAD's -22. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — SAVA or ACAD or PRAX?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

(ACAD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 26β versus Cassava Sciences, Inc. 's 2. 02β — meaning SAVA is approximately 60% more volatile than ACAD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 4% for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — SAVA or ACAD or PRAX?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

(ACAD) is pulling ahead at 11. 9% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cassava Sciences, Inc. grew EPS 77. 6% year-over-year, compared to -32. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — SAVA or ACAD or PRAX?

ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

(ACAD) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 5% net margin versus 0. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACAD leads at 9. 8% versus 0. 0% for PRAX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACAD leads at 91. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is SAVA or ACAD or PRAX more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRAX: 63.

3% to $544. 40.

07

Which pays a better dividend — SAVA or ACAD or PRAX?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is SAVA or ACAD or PRAX better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

(ACAD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 26)). Cassava Sciences, Inc. (SAVA) carries a higher beta of 2. 02 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ACAD: -22. 9%, SAVA: -19. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between SAVA and ACAD and PRAX?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SAVA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SAVA

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ACAD

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 20%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PRAX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.