Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
SAVA vs ACAD vs PRAX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
SAVA vs ACAD vs PRAX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $94M | $3.86B | $9.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $1.10B | $-92K |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-106M | $376M | $-327M |
| Gross Margin | — | 91.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 7.4% | — |
| Forward P/E | — | 50.9x | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $52M | $110K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $129M | $178M | $357M |
SAVA vs ACAD vs PRAX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cassava Sciences, I… (SAVA) | 100 | 167.1 | +67.1% |
| ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD) | 100 | 52.9 | -47.1% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 64.1 | -35.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SAVA vs ACAD vs PRAX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SAVA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -19.5% 10Y total return vs PRAX's -20.1%
ACAD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.26
- Rev growth 11.9%, EPS growth 68.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.5%
- Beta 1.26, current ratio 3.83x
PRAX is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.55, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 10.22x
- +7.7% vs SAVA's +25.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.9% revenue growth vs SAVA's -5.4% | |
| Quality / Margins | 34.3% margin vs PRAX's 2.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.26 vs SAVA's 2.02 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 3 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs SAVA's +25.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.2% ROA vs SAVA's -75.3%, ROIC 10.0% vs -6.3% |
SAVA vs ACAD vs PRAX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SAVA vs ACAD vs PRAX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SAVA leads in 1 of 6 categories
ACAD leads 1 • PRAX leads 1 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SAVA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACAD and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $1.1B and -$92,000 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $1.1B | -$92,000 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$110M | $96M | -$357M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$106M | $376M | -$327M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$84M | $212M | -$283M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +91.5% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +7.4% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +34.3% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +19.4% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +9.7% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +62.1% | -81.8% | +2.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SAVA and PRAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $94M | $3.9B | $9.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$34M | $3.7B | $9.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.76x | 9.85x | -24.72x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 50.91x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 26.91x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 3.61x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.63x | 3.15x | 8.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 36.74x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACAD leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACAD delivers a 35.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-96 for SAVA. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ACAD's 0.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACAD scores 6/9 vs SAVA's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -95.8% | +35.6% | -43.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -75.3% | +26.2% | -40.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -6.3% | +10.0% | -65.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -99.9% | +10.1% | -49.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.04x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$129M | -$126M | -$357M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $129M | $178M | $357M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $52M | $110,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACAD five years ago would be worth $10,710 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,302 for SAVA. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +775.0% total return vs SAVA's +25.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.9% vs SAVA's -16.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.5% | -13.7% | +16.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +25.3% | +52.4% | +775.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -40.8% | +4.7% | +1976.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.0% | +7.1% | -20.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.5% | -22.9% | -20.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.0% | +1.5% | +174.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ACAD and PRAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACAD is the less volatile stock with a 1.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SAVA's 2.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAX currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs SAVA's 39.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.02x | 1.26x | 1.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.98 | $27.81 | $356.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.51 | $14.45 | $35.18 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +39.3% | +81.1% | +93.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.8 | 44.2 | 55.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 712K | 1.8M | 378K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SAVA as "Buy", ACAD as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 63.3% upside for PRAX (target: $544) vs 54.1% for ACAD (target: $35).
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $34.78 | $544.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 37 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SAVA leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). ACAD leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
SAVA vs ACAD vs PRAX: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SAVA or ACAD or PRAX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the stronger pick with 11. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) offers the better valuation at 9. 9x trailing P/E (50. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cassava Sciences, Inc. (SAVA) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SAVA or ACAD or PRAX?
Over the past 5 years, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) delivered a total return of +7. 1%, compared to -67. 0% for Cassava Sciences, Inc. (SAVA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SAVA returned -19. 5% versus ACAD's -22. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SAVA or ACAD or PRAX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 26β versus Cassava Sciences, Inc. 's 2. 02β — meaning SAVA is approximately 60% more volatile than ACAD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 4% for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SAVA or ACAD or PRAX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is pulling ahead at 11. 9% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cassava Sciences, Inc. grew EPS 77. 6% year-over-year, compared to -32. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SAVA or ACAD or PRAX?
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 5% net margin versus 0. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACAD leads at 9. 8% versus 0. 0% for PRAX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACAD leads at 91. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is SAVA or ACAD or PRAX more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRAX: 63.
3% to $544. 40.
07Which pays a better dividend — SAVA or ACAD or PRAX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is SAVA or ACAD or PRAX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 26)). Cassava Sciences, Inc. (SAVA) carries a higher beta of 2. 02 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ACAD: -22. 9%, SAVA: -19. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between SAVA and ACAD and PRAX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SAVA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.