REIT - Industrial
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SELF vs NSA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Industrial
SELF vs NSA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial |
| Market Cap | $62M | $3.34B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13M | $750M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $89M |
| Gross Margin | 55.2% | 28.4% |
| Operating Margin | 21.6% | 31.9% |
| Forward P/E | 30.6x | 82.4x |
| Total Debt | $16M | $3.43B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $24M |
SELF vs NSA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Self Storage… (SELF) | 100 | 132.2 | +32.2% |
| National Storage Af… (NSA) | 100 | 144.5 | +44.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SELF vs NSA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SELF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.20, yield 5.3%
- Rev growth 1.4%, EPS growth -5.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.20, Low D/E 34.0%, current ratio 11.42x
NSA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 182.3% 10Y total return vs SELF's 70.0%
- +26.8% vs SELF's +12.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.4% FFO/revenue growth vs NSA's -2.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (30.6x vs 82.4x), PEG 0.70 vs 14.40 | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.0% margin vs NSA's 11.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.20 vs NSA's 0.81, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.3% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs NSA's 5.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +26.8% vs SELF's +12.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.1% ROA vs NSA's 1.8%, ROIC 3.5% vs 4.1% |
SELF vs NSA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SELF vs NSA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SELF leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NSA is the larger business by revenue, generating $750M annually — 59.0x SELF's $13M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 16.0% (SELF) to 11.9% (NSA).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13M | $750M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4M | $427M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | $89M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4M | $297M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.2% | +28.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.6% | +31.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.0% | +11.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +34.0% | +39.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.9% | -1.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +60.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SELF and NSA each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 30.6x trailing earnings, SELF trades at a 51% valuation discount to NSA's 61.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SELF offers better value at 0.70x vs NSA's 10.83x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $62M | $3.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $71M | $6.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 30.56x | 61.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 82.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.70x | 10.83x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.72x | 14.42x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.91x | 4.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.33x | 2.17x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.04x | 11.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SELF leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NSA delivers a 5.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $4 for SELF. SELF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NSA's 2.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SELF scores 6/9 vs NSA's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.3% | +5.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.1% | +1.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.5% | +4.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.1% | +5.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.34x | 2.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $24M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $16M | $3.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.39x | 1.73x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NSA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SELF five years ago would be worth $13,937 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,002 for NSA. Over the past 12 months, NSA leads with a +26.8% total return vs SELF's +12.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NSA at 9.7% vs SELF's 8.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.3% | +57.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +12.2% | +26.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.6% | +32.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.4% | +20.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +70.0% | +182.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.2% | +9.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SELF and NSA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SELF is the less volatile stock with a 0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NSA's 0.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NSA currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs SELF's 93.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.20x | 0.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.89 | $44.02 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.73 | $27.43 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.4% | +98.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.8 | 55.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 29K | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
SELF leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, SELF offers the higher dividend yield at 5.31% vs NSA's 5.26%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $33.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.3% | +5.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.29 | $2.28 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SELF leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NSA leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
SELF vs NSA: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SELF or NSA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Global Self Storage, Inc.
(SELF) is the stronger pick with 1. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 3% for National Storage Affiliates Trust (NSA). Global Self Storage, Inc. (SELF) offers the better valuation at 30. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate National Storage Affiliates Trust (NSA) a "Hold" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SELF or NSA?
On trailing P/E, Global Self Storage, Inc.
(SELF) is the cheapest at 30. 6x versus National Storage Affiliates Trust at 61. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SELF or NSA?
Over the past 5 years, Global Self Storage, Inc.
(SELF) delivered a total return of +39. 4%, compared to +20. 0% for National Storage Affiliates Trust (NSA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NSA returned +182. 3% versus SELF's +70. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SELF or NSA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Global Self Storage, Inc.
(SELF) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 20β versus National Storage Affiliates Trust's 0. 81β — meaning NSA is approximately 311% more volatile than SELF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Global Self Storage, Inc. (SELF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 2% for National Storage Affiliates Trust — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SELF or NSA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Global Self Storage, Inc.
(SELF) is pulling ahead at 1. 4% versus -2. 3% for National Storage Affiliates Trust (NSA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Global Self Storage, Inc. grew EPS -5. 3% year-over-year, compared to -40. 7% for National Storage Affiliates Trust. Over a 3-year CAGR, SELF leads at 2. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SELF or NSA?
Global Self Storage, Inc.
(SELF) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 0% net margin versus 9. 8% for National Storage Affiliates Trust — meaning it keeps 16. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NSA leads at 37. 0% versus 20. 5% for SELF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NSA leads at 46. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — SELF or NSA?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Global Self Storage, Inc. (SELF) offers the highest yield at 5. 3%, versus 5. 3% for National Storage Affiliates Trust (NSA).
08Is SELF or NSA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Global Self Storage, Inc.
(SELF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 20), 5. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SELF: +70. 0%, NSA: +182. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between SELF and NSA?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.