Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
SHBI vs NBTB vs FUNC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
SHBI vs NBTB vs FUNC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $661M | $2.35B | $248M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $343M | $867M | $112M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $60M | $169M | $25M |
| Gross Margin | 63.2% | 72.1% | 68.8% |
| Operating Margin | 23.0% | 25.3% | 24.4% |
| Forward P/E | 9.7x | 10.8x | 8.7x |
| Total Debt | $111M | $327M | $188M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $50M | $185M | $78M |
SHBI vs NBTB vs FUNC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shore Bancshares, I… (SHBI) | 100 | 197.6 | +97.6% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
| First United Corpor… (FUNC) | 100 | 277.5 | +177.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SHBI vs NBTB vs FUNC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SHBI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and momentum.
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- +41.3% vs NBTB's +9.0%
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 17.3%, current ratio 1.60x
- Beta 0.89, yield 3.2%, current ratio 1.60x
FUNC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 16.9%, EPS growth 40.0%
- 289.2% 10Y total return vs NBTB's 102.2%
- PEG 0.77 vs NBTB's 1.53
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.9% NII/revenue growth vs SHBI's 5.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.7x vs 10.8x), PEG 0.77 vs 1.53 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.72 vs SHBI's 1.01 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs FUNC's 2.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +41.3% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
SHBI vs NBTB vs FUNC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SHBI vs NBTB vs FUNC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NBTB leads in 2 of 6 categories
SHBI leads 2 • FUNC leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 7.8x FUNC's $112M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 19.5% (NBTB) to 17.4% (SHBI).
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $343M | $867M | $112M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $79M | $241M | $36M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $60M | $169M | $25M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $12M | $225M | $16M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.2% | +72.1% | +68.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.0% | +25.3% | +24.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.4% | +19.5% | +18.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.2% | +25.2% | +18.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.0% | +39.5% | +20.2% |
Valuation Metrics
SHBI leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.1x trailing earnings, SHBI trades at a 18% valuation discount to NBTB's 13.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FUNC offers better value at 1.08x vs NBTB's 1.92x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $661M | $2.4B | $248M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $722M | $2.5B | $357M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.10x | 13.53x | 12.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.66x | 10.80x | 8.68x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.59x | 1.92x | 1.08x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.16x | 10.35x | 11.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.93x | 2.71x | 2.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.12x | 1.21x | 1.39x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.09x | 10.75x | 12.18x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SHBI leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FUNC delivers a 12.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $10 for NBTB. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FUNC's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SHBI scores 7/9 vs FUNC's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.4% | +9.5% | +12.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +1.1% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.6% | +7.9% | +5.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.3% | +2.4% | +8.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.19x | 0.17x | 1.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $61M | $142M | $109M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $50M | $185M | $78M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $111M | $327M | $188M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.67x | 1.05x | 1.01x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FUNC five years ago would be worth $23,452 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,989 for NBTB. Over the past 12 months, SHBI leads with a +41.3% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FUNC at 47.1% vs NBTB's 15.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.2% | +9.3% | +4.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +41.3% | +9.0% | +27.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +87.1% | +54.1% | +218.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +32.5% | +29.9% | +134.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +100.1% | +102.2% | +289.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.2% | +15.5% | +47.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NBTB and FUNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FUNC is the less volatile stock with a 0.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHBI's 1.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs FUNC's 91.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.01x | 0.89x | 0.72x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.68 | $46.92 | $41.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.03 | $39.20 | $28.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.6% | +96.1% | +91.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.8 | 57.3 | 50.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 234K | 236K | 11K |
Analyst Outlook
NBTB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SHBI as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", FUNC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 2.1% upside for NBTB (target: $46) vs -34.5% for FUNC (target: $25). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.17% vs FUNC's 2.15%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.75 | $46.00 | $25.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 10 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.4% | +3.2% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 12 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.48 | $1.43 | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% | +1.6% |
NBTB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). SHBI leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
SHBI vs NBTB vs FUNC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SHBI or NBTB or FUNC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the stronger pick with 16.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 0% for Shore Bancshares, Inc. (SHBI). Shore Bancshares, Inc. (SHBI) offers the better valuation at 11. 1x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Shore Bancshares, Inc. (SHBI) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SHBI or NBTB or FUNC?
On trailing P/E, Shore Bancshares, Inc.
(SHBI) is the cheapest at 11. 1x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. at 13. 5x. On forward P/E, First United Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First United Corporation wins at 0. 77x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 53x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SHBI or NBTB or FUNC?
Over the past 5 years, First United Corporation (FUNC) delivered a total return of +134.
5%, compared to +29. 9% for NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FUNC returned +289. 2% versus SHBI's +100. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SHBI or NBTB or FUNC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), First United Corporation (FUNC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
72β versus Shore Bancshares, Inc. 's 1. 01β — meaning SHBI is approximately 41% more volatile than FUNC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 105% for First United Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SHBI or NBTB or FUNC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First United Corporation (FUNC) is pulling ahead at 16.
9% versus 5. 0% for Shore Bancshares, Inc. (SHBI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First United Corporation grew EPS 40. 0% year-over-year, compared to 12. 5% for NBT Bancorp Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SHBI or NBTB or FUNC?
NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 5% net margin versus 17. 4% for Shore Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NBTB leads at 25. 3% versus 23. 0% for SHBI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SHBI or NBTB or FUNC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 77x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 53x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, First United Corporation (FUNC) trades at 8. 7x forward P/E versus 10. 8x for NBT Bancorp Inc. — 2. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NBTB: 2. 1% to $46. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SHBI or NBTB or FUNC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the highest yield at 3. 2%, versus 2. 2% for First United Corporation (FUNC).
09Is SHBI or NBTB or FUNC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
72), 2. 2% yield, +289. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FUNC: +289. 2%, SHBI: +100. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SHBI and NBTB and FUNC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SHBI is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; FUNC is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.