Engineering & Construction
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
SLND vs ROAD vs MYRG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Engineering & Construction
Engineering & Construction
SLND vs ROAD vs MYRG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction |
| Market Cap | $61M | $7.27B | $6.65B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $935M | $3.06B | $3.82B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-94M | $122M | $142M |
| Gross Margin | 4.9% | 15.8% | 11.9% |
| Operating Margin | -1.6% | 8.7% | 5.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 46.6x | 44.0x |
| Total Debt | $321M | $1.69B | $104M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $72M | $156M | $150M |
SLND vs ROAD vs MYRG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Southland Holdings,… (SLND) | 100 | 11.4 | -88.6% |
| Construction Partne… (ROAD) | 100 | 446.7 | +346.7% |
| MYR Group Inc. (MYRG) | 100 | 386.6 | +286.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SLND vs ROAD vs MYRG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SLND is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.53
- Lower volatility, beta 0.53, current ratio 1.42x
- Beta 0.53, current ratio 1.42x
ROAD is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 54.2%, EPS growth 40.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.3%
- PEG 2.49 vs MYRG's 2.64
- 54.2% revenue growth vs SLND's -15.5%
MYRG has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding.
- 16.8% 10Y total return vs ROAD's 9.9%
- Better valuation composite
- +175.2% vs SLND's -66.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 54.2% revenue growth vs SLND's -15.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.0% margin vs SLND's -10.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs MYRG's 1.70 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 3 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +175.2% vs SLND's -66.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.7% ROA vs SLND's -8.0%, ROIC 18.3% vs -19.8% |
SLND vs ROAD vs MYRG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SLND vs ROAD vs MYRG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MYRG leads in 3 of 6 categories
ROAD leads 1 • SLND leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ROAD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MYRG is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.8B annually — 4.1x SLND's $935M. ROAD is the more profitable business, keeping 4.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SLND's -10.1%. On growth, ROAD holds the edge at +44.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $935M | $3.1B | $3.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $9M | $430M | $261M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$94M | $122M | $142M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$8M | $187M | $231M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +4.9% | +15.8% | +11.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.6% | +8.7% | +5.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -10.1% | +4.0% | +3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.9% | +6.1% | +6.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +23.1% | +44.1% | +20.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -22.2% | +6.5% | +106.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SLND and MYRG each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 56.8x trailing earnings, MYRG trades at a 20% valuation discount to ROAD's 71.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MYRG offers better value at 3.40x vs ROAD's 3.81x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $61M | $7.3B | $6.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $310M | $8.8B | $6.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.52x | 71.39x | 56.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 46.61x | 44.03x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.81x | 3.40x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 22.69x | 28.84x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.06x | 2.59x | 1.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.31x | 7.98x | 10.18x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 47.42x | 28.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MYRG leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MYRG delivers a 22.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-63 for SLND. MYRG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ROAD's 1.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MYRG scores 8/9 vs SLND's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -62.8% | +12.6% | +22.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.0% | +3.6% | +8.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -19.8% | +10.3% | +18.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -21.1% | +12.6% | +19.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.83x | 1.85x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $249M | $1.5B | -$47M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $72M | $156M | $150M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $321M | $1.7B | $104M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.34x | 2.56x | 39.49x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MYRG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MYRG five years ago would be worth $51,760 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,159 for SLND. Over the past 12 months, MYRG leads with a +175.2% total return vs SLND's -66.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ROAD at 67.5% vs SLND's -44.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -63.3% | +17.1% | +88.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -66.4% | +46.1% | +175.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.2% | +370.3% | +219.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.4% | +324.4% | +417.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.4% | +985.6% | +1680.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -44.8% | +67.5% | +47.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SLND and ROAD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SLND is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MYRG's 1.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ROAD currently trades 92.6% from its 52-week high vs SLND's 21.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.53x | 1.50x | 1.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.34 | $141.90 | $475.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.65 | $88.88 | $152.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +21.2% | +92.6% | +89.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.8 | 65.5 | 80.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 399K | 489K | 306K |
Analyst Outlook
MYRG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ROAD as "Buy", MYRG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 4.5% upside for ROAD (target: $137) vs -15.3% for MYRG (target: $362).
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $137.33 | $362.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% | +1.2% |
MYRG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). ROAD leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
SLND vs ROAD vs MYRG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SLND or ROAD or MYRG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Construction Partners, Inc.
(ROAD) is the stronger pick with 54. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 5% for Southland Holdings, Inc. (SLND). MYR Group Inc. (MYRG) offers the better valuation at 56. 8x trailing P/E (44. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SLND or ROAD or MYRG?
On trailing P/E, MYR Group Inc.
(MYRG) is the cheapest at 56. 8x versus Construction Partners, Inc. at 71. 4x. On forward P/E, MYR Group Inc. is actually cheaper at 44. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Construction Partners, Inc. wins at 2. 49x versus MYR Group Inc. 's 2. 64x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SLND or ROAD or MYRG?
Over the past 5 years, MYR Group Inc.
(MYRG) delivered a total return of +417. 6%, compared to -88. 4% for Southland Holdings, Inc. (SLND). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MYRG returned +1681% versus SLND's -88. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SLND or ROAD or MYRG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Southland Holdings, Inc.
(SLND) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 53β versus MYR Group Inc. 's 1. 70β — meaning MYRG is approximately 218% more volatile than SLND relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MYR Group Inc. (MYRG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 185% for Construction Partners, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SLND or ROAD or MYRG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Construction Partners, Inc.
(ROAD) is pulling ahead at 54. 2% versus -15. 5% for Southland Holdings, Inc. (SLND). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MYR Group Inc. grew EPS 311. 5% year-over-year, compared to -436. 0% for Southland Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ROAD leads at 29. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SLND or ROAD or MYRG?
Construction Partners, Inc.
(ROAD) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 6% net margin versus -10. 7% for Southland Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ROAD leads at 8. 5% versus -12. 9% for SLND. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ROAD leads at 15. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SLND or ROAD or MYRG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 49x versus MYR Group Inc. 's 2. 64x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, MYR Group Inc. (MYRG) trades at 44. 0x forward P/E versus 46. 6x for Construction Partners, Inc. — 2. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ROAD: 4. 5% to $137. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — SLND or ROAD or MYRG?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is SLND or ROAD or MYRG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MYR Group Inc.
(MYRG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1681% 10Y return). Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD) carries a higher beta of 1. 50 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MYRG: +1681%, ROAD: +985. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SLND and ROAD and MYRG?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SLND is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ROAD is a small-cap high-growth stock; MYRG is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.