Computer Hardware
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
STX vs WDC vs NTAP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Computer Hardware
Computer Hardware
STX vs WDC vs NTAP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Computer Hardware | Computer Hardware | Computer Hardware |
| Market Cap | $171.50B | $163.81B | $22.12B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $11.01B | $11.78B | $6.71B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.38B | $6.49B | $1.21B |
| Gross Margin | 41.5% | 45.4% | 70.5% |
| Operating Margin | 28.3% | 30.8% | 22.2% |
| Forward P/E | 53.3x | 53.6x | 14.0x |
| Total Debt | $5.37B | $5.08B | $3.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $891M | $2.11B | $2.74B |
STX vs WDC vs NTAP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seagate Technology … (STX) | 100 | 1482.7 | +1382.7% |
| Western Digital Cor… (WDC) | 100 | 1440.9 | +1340.9% |
| NetApp, Inc. (NTAP) | 100 | 250.9 | +150.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STX vs WDC vs NTAP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 38.9%, EPS growth 328.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.9%
- 41.6% 10Y total return vs WDC's 16.4%
WDC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and quality.
- 50.7% revenue growth vs NTAP's 4.9%
- 55.1% margin vs NTAP's 18.1%
- +9.9% vs NTAP's +23.4%
NTAP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.34, yield 1.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.34, current ratio 1.26x
- PEG 1.40 vs STX's 4.34
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 50.7% revenue growth vs NTAP's 4.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.0x vs 53.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 55.1% margin vs NTAP's 18.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.34 vs WDC's 2.30 | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs STX's 0.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +9.9% vs NTAP's +23.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 44.0% ROA vs NTAP's 12.2%, ROIC 13.8% vs 54.4% |
STX vs WDC vs NTAP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
STX vs WDC vs NTAP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WDC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WDC is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.8B annually — 1.8x NTAP's $6.7B. WDC is the more profitable business, keeping 55.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NTAP's 18.1%. On growth, WDC holds the edge at +45.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $11.0B | $11.8B | $6.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.4B | $4.0B | $1.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.4B | $6.5B | $1.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.6B | $2.9B | $1.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +41.5% | +45.4% | +70.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +28.3% | +30.8% | +22.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.6% | +55.1% | +18.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.9% | +24.7% | +19.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +44.1% | +45.5% | +4.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +108.3% | +5.0% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
NTAP leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.7x trailing earnings, NTAP trades at a 83% valuation discount to STX's 116.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NTAP offers better value at 1.97x vs STX's 9.44x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $171.5B | $163.8B | $22.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $176.0B | $166.8B | $22.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 116.16x | 94.37x | 19.71x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 53.34x | 53.62x | 14.00x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 9.44x | — | 1.97x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 82.19x | 59.88x | 14.48x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 18.85x | 17.21x | 3.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 32.66x | 22.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 209.65x | 127.57x | 16.54x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — STX and WDC and NTAP each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
STX delivers a 9.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $92 for WDC. WDC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.96x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NTAP's 3.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), STX scores 7/9 vs WDC's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.2% | +91.9% | +104.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +27.9% | +44.0% | +12.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +41.4% | +13.8% | +54.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +37.7% | +17.5% | +22.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.96x | 3.36x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.5B | $3.0B | $749M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $891M | $2.1B | $2.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.4B | $5.1B | $3.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.54x | 26.57x | 14.83x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WDC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WDC five years ago would be worth $91,939 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,654 for NTAP. Over the past 12 months, WDC leads with a +991.9% total return vs NTAP's +23.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WDC at 165.5% vs NTAP's 22.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +173.8% | +157.5% | +5.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +740.6% | +991.9% | +23.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1312.3% | +1772.2% | +84.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +789.6% | +819.4% | +56.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4164.7% | +1638.8% | +456.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +141.7% | +165.5% | +22.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WDC and NTAP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NTAP is the less volatile stock with a 1.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WDC's 2.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WDC currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs NTAP's 88.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.04x | 2.30x | 1.34x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $792.01 | $483.55 | $126.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $91.92 | $43.60 | $91.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.3% | +99.9% | +88.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 86.4 | 81.2 | 68.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.9M | 8.1M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
NTAP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: STX as "Buy", WDC as "Buy", NTAP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 7.8% upside for NTAP (target: $121) vs -20.7% for STX (target: $624). For income investors, NTAP offers the higher dividend yield at 1.82% vs STX's 0.35%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $623.71 | $407.54 | $120.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 52 | 61 | 70 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | +0.0% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.76 | $0.12 | $2.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | +5.2% |
WDC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). NTAP leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
STX vs WDC vs NTAP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STX or WDC or NTAP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Western Digital Corporation (WDC) is the stronger pick with 50.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 9% for NetApp, Inc. (NTAP). NetApp, Inc. (NTAP) offers the better valuation at 19. 7x trailing P/E (14. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Seagate Technology Holdings plc (STX) a "Buy" — based on 52 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — STX or WDC or NTAP?
On trailing P/E, NetApp, Inc.
(NTAP) is the cheapest at 19. 7x versus Seagate Technology Holdings plc at 116. 2x. On forward P/E, NetApp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NetApp, Inc. wins at 1. 40x versus Seagate Technology Holdings plc's 4. 34x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — STX or WDC or NTAP?
Over the past 5 years, Western Digital Corporation (WDC) delivered a total return of +819.
4%, compared to +56. 5% for NetApp, Inc. (NTAP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: STX returned +41. 6% versus NTAP's +456. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — STX or WDC or NTAP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NetApp, Inc.
(NTAP) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 34β versus Western Digital Corporation's 2. 30β — meaning WDC is approximately 71% more volatile than NTAP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Western Digital Corporation (WDC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 96% versus 3% for NetApp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — STX or WDC or NTAP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Western Digital Corporation (WDC) is pulling ahead at 50.
7% versus 4. 9% for NetApp, Inc. (NTAP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Seagate Technology Holdings plc grew EPS 328. 5% year-over-year, compared to 22. 5% for NetApp, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NTAP leads at 1. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — STX or WDC or NTAP?
Western Digital Corporation (WDC) is the more profitable company, earning 19.
5% net margin versus 16. 1% for Seagate Technology Holdings plc — meaning it keeps 19. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WDC leads at 24. 5% versus 20. 3% for NTAP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTAP leads at 70. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is STX or WDC or NTAP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NetApp, Inc. (NTAP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 40x versus Seagate Technology Holdings plc's 4. 34x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, NetApp, Inc. (NTAP) trades at 14. 0x forward P/E versus 53. 6x for Western Digital Corporation — 39. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NTAP: 7. 8% to $120. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — STX or WDC or NTAP?
In this comparison, NTAP (1.
8% yield), STX (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. WDC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is STX or WDC or NTAP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NetApp, Inc.
(NTAP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 8% yield, +456. 8% 10Y return). Seagate Technology Holdings plc (STX) carries a higher beta of 2. 04 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NTAP: +456. 8%, STX: +41. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between STX and WDC and NTAP?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: STX is a mid-cap high-growth stock; WDC is a mid-cap high-growth stock; NTAP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. NTAP pays a dividend while STX, WDC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.