Food Distribution
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SYY vs CHEF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Food Distribution
SYY vs CHEF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Food Distribution | Food Distribution |
| Market Cap | $35.12B | $3.27B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $83.57B | $4.26B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.74B | $79M |
| Gross Margin | 18.5% | 24.3% |
| Operating Margin | 3.6% | 3.8% |
| Forward P/E | 16.0x | 36.7x |
| Total Debt | $14.49B | $1.18B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.07B | $121M |
SYY vs CHEF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sysco Corporation (SYY) | 100 | 132.9 | +32.9% |
| The Chefs' Warehous… (CHEF) | 100 | 541.6 | +441.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SYY vs CHEF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SYY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.47, yield 2.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, current ratio 1.21x
- Beta 0.47, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.21x
CHEF is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 9.4%, EPS growth 27.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.7%
- 394.5% 10Y total return vs SYY's 84.3%
- 9.4% revenue growth vs SYY's 3.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.4% revenue growth vs SYY's 3.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.0x vs 36.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.1% margin vs CHEF's 1.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs CHEF's 0.63 | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield; 37-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +31.2% vs SYY's +7.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.4% ROA vs CHEF's 4.1%, ROIC 15.7% vs 7.7% |
SYY vs CHEF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SYY vs CHEF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHEF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SYY is the larger business by revenue, generating $83.6B annually — 19.6x CHEF's $4.3B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 2.1% (SYY) to 1.9% (CHEF). On growth, CHEF holds the edge at +11.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $83.6B | $4.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4.0B | $419M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.7B | $79M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.0B | $81M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.5% | +24.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.6% | +3.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.1% | +1.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.4% | +1.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.7% | +11.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -13.4% | +60.0% |
Valuation Metrics
SYY leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.7x trailing earnings, SYY trades at a 59% valuation discount to CHEF's 47.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SYY's 11.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CHEF's 18.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $35.1B | $3.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $48.5B | $4.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.66x | 47.71x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.98x | 36.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.36x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.63x | 18.70x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.43x | 0.79x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 19.34x | 6.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.72x | 37.23x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SYY leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SYY delivers a 80.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $81 in annual profit, vs $14 for CHEF. CHEF carries lower financial leverage with a 1.95x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SYY's 7.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CHEF scores 7/9 vs SYY's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +80.7% | +13.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.4% | +4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.7% | +7.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +19.0% | +10.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 7.81x | 1.95x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $13.4B | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.1B | $121M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $14.5B | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.35x | 3.92x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CHEF leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CHEF five years ago would be worth $25,391 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,765 for SYY. Over the past 12 months, CHEF leads with a +31.2% total return vs SYY's +7.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CHEF at 32.0% vs SYY's 1.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.5% | +28.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.8% | +31.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.5% | +129.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -2.4% | +153.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +84.3% | +394.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.5% | +32.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SYY and CHEF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SYY is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CHEF's 0.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CHEF currently trades 99.2% from its 52-week high vs SYY's 80.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.47x | 0.63x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $91.69 | $80.79 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $68.19 | $53.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.0% | +99.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.6 | 74.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.7M | 472K |
Analyst Outlook
SYY leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SYY as "Buy" and CHEF as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 23.3% upside for SYY (target: $90) vs 4.0% for CHEF (target: $83). SYY is the only dividend payer here at 2.78% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $90.44 | $83.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 30 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 37 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.04 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.6% | +0.5% |
SYY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CHEF leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). 1 tied.
SYY vs CHEF: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SYY or CHEF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc.
(CHEF) is the stronger pick with 9. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 2% for Sysco Corporation (SYY). Sysco Corporation (SYY) offers the better valuation at 19. 7x trailing P/E (16. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sysco Corporation (SYY) a "Buy" — based on 30 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SYY or CHEF?
On trailing P/E, Sysco Corporation (SYY) is the cheapest at 19.
7x versus The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. at 47. 7x. On forward P/E, Sysco Corporation is actually cheaper at 16. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SYY or CHEF?
Over the past 5 years, The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc.
(CHEF) delivered a total return of +153. 9%, compared to -2. 4% for Sysco Corporation (SYY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CHEF returned +394. 5% versus SYY's +84. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SYY or CHEF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sysco Corporation (SYY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
47β versus The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. 's 0. 63β — meaning CHEF is approximately 34% more volatile than SYY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. (CHEF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 195% versus 8% for Sysco Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SYY or CHEF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc.
(CHEF) is pulling ahead at 9. 4% versus 3. 2% for Sysco Corporation (SYY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. grew EPS 27. 3% year-over-year, compared to -4. 1% for Sysco Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CHEF leads at 16. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SYY or CHEF?
Sysco Corporation (SYY) is the more profitable company, earning 2.
2% net margin versus 1. 7% for The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SYY leads at 3. 8% versus 3. 7% for CHEF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CHEF leads at 24. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SYY or CHEF more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sysco Corporation (SYY) trades at 16.
0x forward P/E versus 36. 7x for The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. — 20. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SYY: 23. 3% to $90. 44.
08Which pays a better dividend — SYY or CHEF?
In this comparison, SYY (2.
8% yield) pays a dividend. CHEF does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SYY or CHEF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sysco Corporation (SYY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
47), 2. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SYY: +84. 3%, CHEF: +394. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SYY and CHEF?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
SYY pays a dividend while CHEF does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.