Education & Training Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TAL vs CHGG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Education & Training Services
TAL vs CHGG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services |
| Market Cap | $750M | $130M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.66B | $319M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $171M | $-86M |
| Gross Margin | 54.4% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | 2.7% | -11.1% |
| Forward P/E | 17.6x | — |
| Total Debt | $333M | $84M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.77B | $31M |
TAL vs CHGG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TAL Education Group (TAL) | 100 | 19.6 | -80.4% |
| Chegg, Inc. (CHGG) | 100 | 1.9 | -98.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TAL vs CHGG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TAL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.99
- Rev growth 51.2%, EPS growth 24.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -20.0%
- 23.9% 10Y total return vs CHGG's -73.5%
CHGG is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +60.3% vs TAL's +17.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 51.2% revenue growth vs CHGG's -39.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.5% margin vs CHGG's -26.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.99 vs CHGG's 2.83, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +60.3% vs TAL's +17.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.1% ROA vs CHGG's -26.3%, ROIC -0.3% vs -13.4% |
TAL vs CHGG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TAL vs CHGG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TAL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TAL is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.7B annually — 8.3x CHGG's $319M. TAL is the more profitable business, keeping 6.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CHGG's -26.9%. On growth, TAL holds the edge at +38.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.7B | $319M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $72M | $11M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $171M | -$86M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $441M | -$25M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +54.4% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.7% | -11.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.5% | -26.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.6% | -8.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +38.7% | -47.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -21.4% | +101.2% |
Valuation Metrics
TAL leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $750M | $130M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$688M | $183M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.80x | -1.21x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.63x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -16.89x | 11.94x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.33x | 0.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.20x | 1.04x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.62x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
TAL leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TAL delivers a 4.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-63 for CHGG. TAL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CHGG's 0.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CHGG scores 6/9 vs TAL's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.7% | -62.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.1% | -26.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.3% | -13.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.2% | -26.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | 0.70x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.6B | $53M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.8B | $31M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $333M | $84M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -525.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TAL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TAL five years ago would be worth $2,046 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $141 for CHGG. Over the past 12 months, CHGG leads with a +60.3% total return vs TAL's +17.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TAL at 25.5% vs CHGG's -51.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.5% | +18.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +17.0% | +60.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +97.7% | -88.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.5% | -98.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +23.9% | -73.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.5% | -51.4% |
Risk & Volatility
TAL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TAL is the less volatile stock with a 0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CHGG's 2.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TAL currently trades 82.9% from its 52-week high vs CHGG's 61.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.99x | 2.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.37 | $1.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.07 | $0.53 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.9% | +61.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.7 | 68.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.3M | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
CHGG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TAL as "Hold" and CHGG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 2522.4% upside for CHGG (target: $30) vs 62.3% for TAL (target: $18).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.00 | $30.42 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 28 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.8% | 0.0% |
TAL leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CHGG leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook).
TAL vs CHGG: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TAL or CHGG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TAL Education Group (TAL) is the stronger pick with 51.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -39. 0% for Chegg, Inc. (CHGG). TAL Education Group (TAL) offers the better valuation at 8. 8x trailing P/E (17. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TAL Education Group (TAL) a "Hold" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TAL or CHGG?
Over the past 5 years, TAL Education Group (TAL) delivered a total return of -79.
5%, compared to -98. 6% for Chegg, Inc. (CHGG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TAL returned +23. 9% versus CHGG's -73. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TAL or CHGG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TAL Education Group (TAL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
99β versus Chegg, Inc. 's 2. 83β — meaning CHGG is approximately 187% more volatile than TAL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TAL Education Group (TAL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 70% for Chegg, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — TAL or CHGG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TAL Education Group (TAL) is pulling ahead at 51.
2% versus -39. 0% for Chegg, Inc. (CHGG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TAL Education Group grew EPS 24. 7% year-over-year, compared to 88. 1% for Chegg, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TAL leads at -20. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — TAL or CHGG?
TAL Education Group (TAL) is the more profitable company, earning 3.
8% net margin versus -27. 4% for Chegg, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TAL leads at -0. 3% versus -16. 8% for CHGG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CHGG leads at 60. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is TAL or CHGG more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CHGG: 2522.
4% to $30. 42.
07Which pays a better dividend — TAL or CHGG?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is TAL or CHGG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TAL Education Group (TAL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
99)). Chegg, Inc. (CHGG) carries a higher beta of 2. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TAL: +23. 9%, CHGG: -73. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between TAL and CHGG?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TAL is a small-cap high-growth stock; CHGG is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.