TBB
AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66
Telecommunications Services
Market Cap$133.05B
5Y Perf.-17.4%
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
TBB vs VZ vs T
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
VZ
Verizon Communications Inc.
Telecommunications Services
Market Cap$198.61B
5Y Perf.-17.9%
T
AT&T Inc.
Telecommunications Services
Market Cap$176.40B
5Y Perf.+8.5%
TBB vs VZ vs T — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | TBB | VZ | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $133.05B | $198.61B | $176.40B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $126.52B | $138.19B | $126.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $21.41B | $17.17B | $21.41B |
| Gross Margin | 79.7% | 55.7% | 79.7% |
| Operating Margin | 19.4% | 21.2% | 19.4% |
| Forward P/E | 9.5x | 9.5x | 10.9x |
| Total Debt | $173.99B | $200.59B | $173.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $18.23B | $19.05B | $18.23B |
TBB vs VZ vs T — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
TBB
VZ
T
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB… (TBB) | 100 | 82.6 | -17.4% |
| Verizon Communicati… (VZ) | 100 | 82.1 | -17.9% |
| AT&T Inc. (T) | 100 | 108.5 | +8.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TBB vs VZ vs T
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: TBB leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Verizon Communications Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TBB
AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66
The Growth Play
TBB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 2.7%, EPS growth 104.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.78, current ratio 0.91x
- 2.7% revenue growth vs VZ's 2.5%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
VZ
Verizon Communications Inc.
The Income Pick
VZ is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta -0.11, yield 5.8%
- Beta -0.11, yield 5.8%, current ratio 0.91x
- 5.8% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs TBB's 5.3%
Best for: income & stability and defensive
T
AT&T Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
T is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 41.9% 10Y total return vs VZ's 41.6%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TBB | 2.7% revenue growth vs VZ's 2.5% |
| Value | TBB | Lower P/E (9.5x vs 10.9x) |
| Quality / Margins | TBB | 16.9% margin vs VZ's 12.4% |
| Stability / Safety | TBB | Lower D/E ratio (135.4% vs 189.7%) |
| Dividends | VZ | 5.8% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs TBB's 5.3% |
| Momentum (1Y) | VZ | +13.6% vs T's -6.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TBB | 5.1% ROA vs VZ's 4.4%, ROIC 6.7% vs 8.0% |
TBB vs VZ vs T — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
TBB vs VZ vs T — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLTBBLAGGINGT
TAT&T Inc.
1leads
VZVerizon Communication…
1leads
TBBAT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB N…
1leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs VZvs TMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
TBB6/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
Tied
—
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
T4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
VZ2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — TBB and T each lead in 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VZ and T operate at a comparable scale, with $138.2B and $126.5B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 16.9% (TBB) to 12.4% (VZ).
| Metric | TBBAT&T Inc. 5.35% G… | VZVerizon Communica… | TAT&T Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $126.5B | $138.2B | $126.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $45.1B | $47.6B | $45.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $21.4B | $17.2B | $21.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10.6B | $19.8B | $10.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +79.7% | +55.7% | +79.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.4% | +21.2% | +19.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.9% | +12.4% | +16.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.4% | +14.3% | +8.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.9% | +2.0% | +2.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.5% | -53.4% | -11.5% |
Evenly matched — TBB and T each lead in 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
TBB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.1x trailing earnings, TBB trades at a 39% valuation discount to VZ's 11.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TBB's 6.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than VZ's 8.0x.
| Metric | TBBAT&T Inc. 5.35% G… | VZVerizon Communica… | TAT&T Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $133.0B | $198.6B | $176.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $288.8B | $380.2B | $332.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.13x | 11.60x | 8.31x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.49x | 9.52x | 10.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.41x | 7.99x | 7.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.06x | 1.44x | 1.40x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.21x | 1.88x | 1.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.84x | 9.87x | 9.07x |
TBB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — TBB and T each lead in 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TBB delivers a 16.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $16 for VZ. TBB carries lower financial leverage with a 1.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VZ's 1.90x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TBB scores 7/9 vs VZ's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | TBBAT&T Inc. 5.35% G… | VZVerizon Communica… | TAT&T Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.8% | +16.4% | +16.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.1% | +4.4% | +5.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.7% | +8.0% | +6.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.8% | +8.8% | +6.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.35x | 1.90x | 1.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $155.8B | $181.5B | $155.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $18.2B | $19.0B | $18.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $174.0B | $200.6B | $174.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.97x | 4.39x | 4.97x |
Evenly matched — TBB and T each lead in 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
T leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in T five years ago would be worth $12,995 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,277 for VZ. Over the past 12 months, VZ leads with a +13.6% total return vs T's -6.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors T at 18.6% vs TBB's 3.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TBBAT&T Inc. 5.35% G… | VZVerizon Communica… | TAT&T Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.0% | +19.7% | +5.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1.3% | +13.6% | -6.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +9.9% | +45.9% | +67.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.2% | +2.8% | +29.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +30.8% | +41.6% | +41.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.2% | +13.4% | +18.6% |
T leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VZ and T each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
T is the less volatile stock with a -0.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TBB's 0.78 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VZ currently trades 91.1% from its 52-week high vs T's 84.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | TBBAT&T Inc. 5.35% G… | VZVerizon Communica… | TAT&T Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.78x | -0.11x | -0.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.10 | $51.68 | $29.79 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.92 | $10.60 | $22.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.9% | +91.1% | +84.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.7 | 49.3 | 38.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 94K | 24.3M | 33.7M |
Evenly matched — VZ and T each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
VZ leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TBB as "Hold", VZ as "Hold", T as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 16.5% upside for T (target: $29) vs -1.8% for TBB (target: $21). For income investors, VZ offers the higher dividend yield at 5.76% vs T's 4.51%.
| Metric | TBBAT&T Inc. 5.35% G… | VZVerizon Communica… | TAT&T Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $21.29 | $51.56 | $29.42 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 60 | 62 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.3% | +5.8% | +4.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 11 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.14 | $2.71 | $1.14 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.4% | 0.0% | +2.6% |
VZ leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
TBB leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). T leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
Best OverallAT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66 (TBB)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
TBB vs VZ vs T: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TBB or VZ or T a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AT&T Inc.
5. 35% GLB NTS 66 (TBB) is the stronger pick with 2. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 5% for Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ). AT&T Inc. 5. 35% GLB NTS 66 (TBB) offers the better valuation at 7. 1x trailing P/E (9. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AT&T Inc. 5. 35% GLB NTS 66 (TBB) a "Hold" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TBB or VZ or T?
On trailing P/E, AT&T Inc.
5. 35% GLB NTS 66 (TBB) is the cheapest at 7. 1x versus Verizon Communications Inc. at 11. 6x. On forward P/E, AT&T Inc. 5. 35% GLB NTS 66 is actually cheaper at 9. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TBB or VZ or T?
Over the past 5 years, AT&T Inc.
(T) delivered a total return of +29. 9%, compared to +2. 8% for Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: T returned +41. 9% versus TBB's +30. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TBB or VZ or T?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AT&T Inc.
(T) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 26β versus AT&T Inc. 5. 35% GLB NTS 66's 0. 78β — meaning TBB is approximately -401% more volatile than T relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AT&T Inc. 5. 35% GLB NTS 66 (TBB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 135% versus 190% for Verizon Communications Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TBB or VZ or T?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AT&T Inc.
5. 35% GLB NTS 66 (TBB) is pulling ahead at 2. 7% versus 2. 5% for Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AT&T Inc. 5. 35% GLB NTS 66 grew EPS 104. 0% year-over-year, compared to -2. 2% for Verizon Communications Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TBB leads at 1. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TBB or VZ or T?
AT&T Inc.
5. 35% GLB NTS 66 (TBB) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 4% net margin versus 12. 4% for Verizon Communications Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VZ leads at 21. 2% versus 19. 2% for T. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TBB leads at 79. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TBB or VZ or T more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, AT&T Inc.
5. 35% GLB NTS 66 (TBB) trades at 9. 5x forward P/E versus 10. 9x for AT&T Inc. — 1. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for T: 16. 5% to $29. 42.
08Which pays a better dividend — TBB or VZ or T?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) offers the highest yield at 5. 8%, versus 4. 5% for AT&T Inc. (T).
09Is TBB or VZ or T better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AT&T Inc.
(T) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 26), 4. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (T: +41. 9%, TBB: +30. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TBB and VZ and T?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 10%
- Dividend Yield > 2.1%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 10%
- Dividend Yield > 1.8%
Revenue Growth>
%
(TBB: 2.9% · VZ: 2.0%)Net Margin>
%
(TBB: 16.9% · VZ: 12.4%)P/E Ratio<
x
(TBB: 7.1x · VZ: 11.6x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.