Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
TDOC vs AMWL vs HIMS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Medical - Equipment & Services
TDOC vs AMWL vs HIMS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $1.26B | $129M | $6.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.51B | $182M | $2.35B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-171M | $-88M | $128M |
| Gross Margin | 65.6% | 38.7% | 69.7% |
| Operating Margin | -7.6% | -50.6% | 4.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 51.5x |
| Total Debt | $1.04B | $5M | $1.12B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $781M | $182M | $229M |
TDOC vs AMWL vs HIMS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC) | 100 | 3.2 | -96.8% |
| American Well Corpo… (AMWL) | 100 | 1.3 | -98.7% |
| Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS) | 100 | 218.4 | +118.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TDOC vs AMWL vs HIMS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TDOC is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
AMWL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.47
- Lower volatility, beta 1.47, Low D/E 1.8%, current ratio 3.37x
- Beta 1.47, current ratio 3.37x
HIMS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 59.0%, EPS growth -3.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 64.5%
- 161.9% 10Y total return vs TDOC's -41.1%
- 59.0% revenue growth vs AMWL's -2.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 59.0% revenue growth vs AMWL's -2.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.5% margin vs AMWL's -48.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.47 vs HIMS's 2.40, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 3 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +14.3% vs HIMS's -51.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.0% ROA vs AMWL's -25.1%, ROIC 10.7% vs -95.1% |
TDOC vs AMWL vs HIMS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TDOC vs AMWL vs HIMS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HIMS leads in 2 of 6 categories
TDOC leads 1 • AMWL leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HIMS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TDOC is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.5B annually — 13.8x AMWL's $182M. HIMS is the more profitable business, keeping 5.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMWL's -48.2%. On growth, HIMS holds the edge at +28.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.5B | $182M | $2.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $42M | -$59M | $164M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$171M | -$88M | $128M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $251M | -$42M | $73M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +65.6% | +38.7% | +69.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -7.6% | -50.6% | +4.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.8% | -48.2% | +5.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.0% | -22.9% | +3.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.5% | -100.0% | +28.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +32.1% | +44.5% | -27.3% |
Valuation Metrics
TDOC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, TDOC's 15.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HIMS's 42.7x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $129M | $6.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | -$48M | $7.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.11x | -1.30x | 50.32x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 51.51x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.13x | — | 42.68x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.50x | 0.52x | 2.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.89x | 0.50x | 12.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.40x | — | 89.61x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — AMWL and HIMS each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HIMS delivers a 23.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-33 for AMWL. AMWL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIMS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TDOC scores 6/9 vs HIMS's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -12.4% | -33.5% | +23.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.9% | -25.1% | +6.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -11.5% | -95.1% | +10.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -10.0% | -36.6% | +10.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.75x | 0.02x | 2.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $259M | -$178M | $892M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $781M | $182M | $229M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.0B | $5M | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -8.76x | -239.18x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HIMS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HIMS five years ago would be worth $23,764 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $278 for AMWL. Over the past 12 months, AMWL leads with a +14.3% total return vs HIMS's -51.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HIMS at 29.4% vs AMWL's -42.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.3% | +59.8% | -23.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1.5% | +14.3% | -51.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.3% | -80.7% | +116.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.4% | -97.2% | +137.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.1% | -98.3% | +161.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -35.6% | -42.2% | +29.4% |
Risk & Volatility
AMWL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMWL is the less volatile stock with a 1.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIMS's 2.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMWL currently trades 84.7% from its 52-week high vs HIMS's 36.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.91x | 1.47x | 2.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.77 | $9.15 | $70.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.40 | $3.71 | $13.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.2% | +84.7% | +36.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 74.1 | 67.1 | 54.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.5M | 59K | 34.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TDOC as "Hold", HIMS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 15.6% upside for HIMS (target: $30) vs 8.9% for TDOC (target: $8).
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.58 | — | $29.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 42 | — | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% | +1.4% |
HIMS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). TDOC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
TDOC vs AMWL vs HIMS: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TDOC or AMWL or HIMS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 0% for American Well Corporation (AMWL). Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) offers the better valuation at 50. 3x trailing P/E (51. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC) a "Hold" — based on 42 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TDOC or AMWL or HIMS?
Over the past 5 years, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) delivered a total return of +137. 6%, compared to -97. 2% for American Well Corporation (AMWL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HIMS returned +161. 9% versus AMWL's -98. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TDOC or AMWL or HIMS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American Well Corporation (AMWL) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
47β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 40β — meaning HIMS is approximately 64% more volatile than AMWL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, American Well Corporation (AMWL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 2% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — TDOC or AMWL or HIMS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus -2. 0% for American Well Corporation (AMWL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Teladoc Health, Inc. grew EPS 80. 6% year-over-year, compared to -3. 8% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIMS leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — TDOC or AMWL or HIMS?
Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 5% net margin versus -38. 4% for American Well Corporation — meaning it keeps 5. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HIMS leads at 5. 2% versus -42. 2% for AMWL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TDOC leads at 69. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is TDOC or AMWL or HIMS more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HIMS: 15.
6% to $29. 67.
07Which pays a better dividend — TDOC or AMWL or HIMS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is TDOC or AMWL or HIMS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, American Well Corporation (AMWL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.
Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC) carries a higher beta of 1. 91 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMWL: -98. 3%, TDOC: -41. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between TDOC and AMWL and HIMS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TDOC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMWL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.