Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TEAM vs NOW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
TEAM vs NOW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $23.33B | $92.27B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.19B | $13.96B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-217M | $1.76B |
| Gross Margin | 83.9% | 76.6% |
| Operating Margin | -3.7% | 13.4% |
| Forward P/E | 18.7x | 21.4x |
| Total Debt | $1.24B | $3.20B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.51B | $3.73B |
TEAM vs NOW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atlassian Corporati… (TEAM) | 100 | 47.9 | -52.1% |
| ServiceNow, Inc. (NOW) | 100 | 23.0 | -77.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TEAM vs NOW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TEAM has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.98
- 306.8% 10Y total return vs NOW's 32.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.98, Low D/E 92.1%, current ratio 1.22x
NOW is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 20.9%, EPS growth 21.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.4%
- 20.9% revenue growth vs TEAM's 19.7%
- 12.6% margin vs TEAM's -3.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.9% revenue growth vs TEAM's 19.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.7x vs 21.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.6% margin vs TEAM's -3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.98 vs NOW's 1.46 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -57.3% vs NOW's -90.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.5% ROA vs TEAM's -3.7%, ROIC 12.4% vs -110.3% |
TEAM vs NOW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TEAM vs NOW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NOW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NOW is the larger business by revenue, generating $14.0B annually — 2.3x TEAM's $6.2B. NOW is the more profitable business, keeping 12.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TEAM's -3.5%. On growth, TEAM holds the edge at +31.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.2B | $14.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$105M | $2.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$217M | $1.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.2B | $4.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +83.9% | +76.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.7% | +13.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.5% | +12.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.5% | +33.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +31.7% | +22.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -40.7% | +2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
TEAM leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $23.3B | $92.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $22.1B | $91.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -90.61x | 53.32x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.67x | 21.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.77x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 35.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.47x | 6.95x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 17.28x | 7.19x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.48x | 20.16x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NOW leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NOW delivers a 15.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-17 for TEAM. NOW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.25x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TEAM's 0.92x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TEAM scores 7/9 vs NOW's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -16.7% | +15.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.7% | +7.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -110.3% | +12.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.8% | +13.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.92x | 0.25x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.3B | -$523M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.5B | $3.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.2B | $3.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.49x | 185.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TEAM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TEAM five years ago would be worth $4,059 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,833 for NOW. Over the past 12 months, TEAM leads with a -57.3% total return vs NOW's -90.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TEAM at -11.9% vs NOW's -41.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -42.6% | -39.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -57.3% | -90.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.7% | -79.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.4% | -81.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +306.8% | +32.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -11.9% | -41.2% |
Risk & Volatility
TEAM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TEAM is the less volatile stock with a 0.98 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NOW's 1.46 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TEAM currently trades 38.2% from its 52-week high vs NOW's 8.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.98x | 1.46x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $232.36 | $1057.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $56.01 | $81.24 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +38.2% | +8.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.5 | 44.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7.4M | 20.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TEAM as "Buy" and NOW as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 70.2% upside for NOW (target: $152) vs 55.2% for TEAM (target: $138).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $137.79 | $151.52 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 42 | 68 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.3% | +2.0% |
TEAM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). NOW leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency).
TEAM vs NOW: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TEAM or NOW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ServiceNow, Inc.
(NOW) is the stronger pick with 20. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 19. 7% for Atlassian Corporation (TEAM). ServiceNow, Inc. (NOW) offers the better valuation at 53. 3x trailing P/E (21. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) a "Buy" — based on 42 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TEAM or NOW?
On forward P/E, Atlassian Corporation is actually cheaper at 18.
7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TEAM or NOW?
Over the past 5 years, Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) delivered a total return of -59.
4%, compared to -81. 7% for ServiceNow, Inc. (NOW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TEAM returned +306. 8% versus NOW's +32. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TEAM or NOW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
98β versus ServiceNow, Inc. 's 1. 46β — meaning NOW is approximately 50% more volatile than TEAM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ServiceNow, Inc. (NOW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 25% versus 92% for Atlassian Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TEAM or NOW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ServiceNow, Inc.
(NOW) is pulling ahead at 20. 9% versus 19. 7% for Atlassian Corporation (TEAM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ServiceNow, Inc. grew EPS 21. 9% year-over-year, compared to 15. 5% for Atlassian Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, TEAM leads at 23. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TEAM or NOW?
ServiceNow, Inc.
(NOW) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 2% net margin versus -4. 9% for Atlassian Corporation — meaning it keeps 13. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NOW leads at 13. 7% versus -2. 5% for TEAM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TEAM leads at 82. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TEAM or NOW more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) trades at 18.
7x forward P/E versus 21. 4x for ServiceNow, Inc. — 2. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NOW: 70. 2% to $151. 52.
08Which pays a better dividend — TEAM or NOW?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is TEAM or NOW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
98), +306. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TEAM: +306. 8%, NOW: +32. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TEAM and NOW?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.