TKO vs MSGS

For growth investors, TKO Group Holdings, Inc.

(TKO) is the stronger pick with 68. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 2% for Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. (MSGS). TKO Group Holdings, Inc. (TKO) offers the better valuation at 83. 0x trailing P/E (38. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TKO Group Holdings, Inc. (TKO) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, TKO Group Holdings, Inc.

(TKO) delivered a total return of +256. 4%, compared to +84. 5% for Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. (MSGS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TKO returned +1060% versus MSGS's +321. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Madison Square Garden Sports Corp.

(MSGS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 61β versus TKO Group Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 64β — meaning TKO is approximately 5% more volatile than MSGS relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), TKO Group Holdings, Inc.

(TKO) is pulling ahead at 68. 9% versus 1. 2% for Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. (MSGS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TKO Group Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 40. 3% year-over-year, compared to -138. 1% for Madison Square Garden Sports Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TKO leads at 60. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

TKO Group Holdings, Inc.

(TKO) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 1% net margin versus -2. 2% for Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. — meaning it keeps 4. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TKO leads at 20. 3% versus 1. 4% for MSGS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TKO leads at 49. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TKO: 26.

2% to $236. 67.

In this comparison, TKO (1.

8% yield) pays a dividend. MSGS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, TKO Group Holdings, Inc.

(TKO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 64), 1. 8% yield, +1060% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TKO: +1060%, MSGS: +321. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: TKO is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MSGS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. TKO pays a dividend while MSGS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.