TKO vs LYV

For growth investors, TKO Group Holdings, Inc.

(TKO) is the stronger pick with 68. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 8% for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (LYV). TKO Group Holdings, Inc. (TKO) offers the better valuation at 84. 3x trailing P/E (38. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TKO Group Holdings, Inc. (TKO) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, TKO Group Holdings, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 38. 7x.

Over the past 5 years, TKO Group Holdings, Inc.

(TKO) delivered a total return of +261. 2%, compared to +123. 4% for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (LYV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TKO returned +1073% versus LYV's +616. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TKO Group Holdings, Inc.

(TKO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 64β versus Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. 's 0. 80β — meaning LYV is approximately 25% more volatile than TKO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TKO Group Holdings, Inc. (TKO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 44% versus 7% for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), TKO Group Holdings, Inc.

(TKO) is pulling ahead at 68. 9% versus 8. 8% for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (LYV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TKO Group Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 40. 3% year-over-year, compared to -108. 8% for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TKO leads at 60. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

TKO Group Holdings, Inc.

(TKO) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 1% net margin versus 2. 0% for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TKO leads at 20. 3% versus 5. 9% for LYV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TKO leads at 49. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, TKO Group Holdings, Inc.

(TKO) trades at 38. 7x forward P/E versus 116. 8x for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. — 78. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TKO: 24. 3% to $236. 67.

In this comparison, TKO (1.

7% yield) pays a dividend. LYV does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, TKO Group Holdings, Inc.

(TKO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 64), 1. 7% yield, +1073% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TKO: +1073%, LYV: +616. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: TKO is a mid-cap high-growth stock; LYV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. TKO pays a dividend while LYV does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.