Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
TKR vs RBC vs NN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories
Internet Content & Information
TKR vs RBC vs NN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories | Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $8.35B | $20.38B | $2.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.67B | $1.79B | $5M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $316M | $269M | $-189M |
| Gross Margin | 20.4% | 44.3% | -256.2% |
| Operating Margin | 12.6% | 23.8% | -15.4% |
| Forward P/E | 20.3x | 51.3x | — |
| Total Debt | $2.16B | $1.03B | $15M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $365M | $37M | $45M |
TKR vs RBC vs NN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Timken Company (TKR) | 100 | 163.0 | +63.0% |
| RBC Bearings Incorp… (RBC) | 100 | 523.5 | +423.5% |
| NextNav Inc. (NN) | 100 | 195.3 | +95.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TKR vs RBC vs NN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TKR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 1.50, yield 1.2%
- Better valuation composite
- 1.2% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs RBC's 0.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
RBC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 4.9%, EPS growth 20.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 20.2%
- 8.7% 10Y total return vs TKR's 292.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.05, Low D/E 33.9%, current ratio 3.26x
NN plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.9% revenue growth vs NN's -19.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.0% margin vs NN's -41.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.05 vs TKR's 1.50, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs RBC's 0.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +82.7% vs NN's +46.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.2% ROA vs NN's -73.1% |
TKR vs RBC vs NN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TKR vs RBC vs NN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RBC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TKR is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.7B annually — 1021.8x NN's $5M. RBC is the more profitable business, keeping 15.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NN's -41.4%. On growth, RBC holds the edge at +17.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.7B | $1.8B | $5M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $766M | $548M | -$62M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $316M | $269M | -$189M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $383M | $330M | -$51M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +20.4% | +44.3% | -2.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.6% | +23.8% | -15.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | +15.0% | -41.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.2% | +18.4% | -11.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.0% | +17.0% | -50.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +26.1% | +17.0% | -85.2% |
Valuation Metrics
TKR leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 29.1x trailing earnings, TKR trades at a 64% valuation discount to RBC's 80.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), RBC offers better value at 9.24x vs TKR's 14.46x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8.4B | $20.4B | $2.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.1B | $21.4B | $2.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 29.12x | 80.93x | -13.61x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.31x | 51.25x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 14.46x | 9.24x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.74x | 43.62x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.82x | 12.45x | 572.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.51x | 6.24x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.57x | 83.58x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
RBC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TKR delivers a 9.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $8 for RBC. RBC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TKR's 0.64x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RBC scores 7/9 vs NN's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.5% | +8.2% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.7% | +5.2% | -73.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.5% | +6.9% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.0% | +8.5% | -36.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.64x | 0.34x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.8B | $992M | -$30M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $365M | $37M | $45M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.2B | $1.0B | $15M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.17x | 7.78x | -5.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — TKR and RBC and NN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RBC five years ago would be worth $41,339 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,955 for TKR. Over the past 12 months, TKR leads with a +82.7% total return vs NN's +46.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NN at 108.6% vs TKR's 17.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +39.1% | +35.8% | +19.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +82.7% | +82.4% | +46.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.8% | +178.6% | +807.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.5% | +313.4% | +94.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +292.1% | +869.6% | +98.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.6% | +40.7% | +108.6% |
Risk & Volatility
RBC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RBC is the less volatile stock with a 1.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TKR's 1.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RBC currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs NN's 79.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.50x | 1.05x | 1.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $123.67 | $631.88 | $24.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $65.49 | $337.43 | $10.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.8% | +98.6% | +79.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.6 | 61.2 | 53.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 757K | 177K | 2.2M |
Analyst Outlook
TKR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TKR as "Buy", RBC as "Buy", NN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 36.2% upside for NN (target: $26) vs -8.1% for RBC (target: $573). TKR is the only dividend payer here at 1.17% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $115.33 | $572.60 | $26.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 26 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.2% | +0.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 16 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.40 | $0.57 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.7% | +0.0% | 0.0% |
RBC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TKR leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
TKR vs RBC vs NN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TKR or RBC or NN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC) is the stronger pick with 4.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 3% for NextNav Inc. (NN). The Timken Company (TKR) offers the better valuation at 29. 1x trailing P/E (20. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Timken Company (TKR) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TKR or RBC or NN?
On trailing P/E, The Timken Company (TKR) is the cheapest at 29.
1x versus RBC Bearings Incorporated at 80. 9x. On forward P/E, The Timken Company is actually cheaper at 20. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: RBC Bearings Incorporated wins at 5. 85x versus The Timken Company's 10. 08x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TKR or RBC or NN?
Over the past 5 years, RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC) delivered a total return of +313.
4%, compared to +39. 5% for The Timken Company (TKR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RBC returned +869. 6% versus NN's +98. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TKR or RBC or NN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
05β versus The Timken Company's 1. 50β — meaning TKR is approximately 43% more volatile than RBC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 64% for The Timken Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TKR or RBC or NN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC) is pulling ahead at 4.
9% versus -19. 3% for NextNav Inc. (NN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: RBC Bearings Incorporated grew EPS 20. 3% year-over-year, compared to -69. 0% for NextNav Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RBC leads at 20. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TKR or RBC or NN?
RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
0% net margin versus -41. 4% for NextNav Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RBC leads at 22. 6% versus -1535. 8% for NN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RBC leads at 44. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TKR or RBC or NN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 5. 85x versus The Timken Company's 10. 08x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, The Timken Company (TKR) trades at 20. 3x forward P/E versus 51. 3x for RBC Bearings Incorporated — 30. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NN: 36. 2% to $26. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — TKR or RBC or NN?
In this comparison, TKR (1.
2% yield) pays a dividend. RBC, NN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TKR or RBC or NN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
05), +869. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RBC: +869. 6%, NN: +98. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TKR and RBC and NN?
These companies operate in different sectors (TKR (Industrials) and RBC (Industrials) and NN (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
TKR pays a dividend while RBC, NN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.