TR vs MDLZ

For growth investors, Mondelez International, Inc.

(MDLZ) is the stronger pick with 5. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 3% for Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. (TR). Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. (TR) offers the better valuation at 30. 5x trailing P/E (22. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) a "Buy" — based on 41 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc.

(TR) is the cheapest at 30. 5x versus Mondelez International, Inc. at 32. 7x. On forward P/E, Mondelez International, Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc.

(TR) delivered a total return of +62. 3%, compared to +13. 7% for Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TR returned +74. 1% versus MDLZ's +71. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc.

(TR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 03β versus Mondelez International, Inc. 's 0. 06β — meaning MDLZ is approximately -332% more volatile than TR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. (TR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 87% for Mondelez International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Mondelez International, Inc.

(MDLZ) is pulling ahead at 5. 8% versus 1. 3% for Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. (TR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. grew EPS 16. 1% year-over-year, compared to -44. 7% for Mondelez International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MDLZ leads at 7. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc.

(TR) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 7% net margin versus 6. 4% for Mondelez International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TR leads at 14. 0% versus 9. 4% for MDLZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TR leads at 35. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Mondelez International, Inc.

(MDLZ) trades at 20. 2x forward P/E versus 22. 3x for Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. — 2. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) offers the highest yield at 3. 1%, versus 0. 9% for Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. (TR).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc.

(TR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 03), 0. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TR: +74. 1%, MDLZ: +71. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: TR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MDLZ is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.