Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TYRA vs NUVL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
TYRA vs NUVL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $1.77B | $7.53B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-120M | $-450M |
| Total Debt | $6M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $77M | $262M |
TYRA vs NUVL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tyra Biosciences, I… (TYRA) | 100 | 187.0 | +87.0% |
| Nuvalent, Inc. (NUVL) | 100 | 454.1 | +354.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TYRA vs NUVL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TYRA has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.75
- EPS growth -33.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.75, Low D/E 2.2%, current ratio 14.67x
NUVL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 446.1% 10Y total return vs TYRA's 26.5%
- 1.1% revenue growth vs TYRA's -38.9%
- -37.8% ROA vs TYRA's -38.4%, ROIC -32.5% vs -44.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.1% revenue growth vs TYRA's -38.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.75 vs NUVL's 1.09 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +260.4% vs NUVL's +53.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -37.8% ROA vs TYRA's -38.4%, ROIC -32.5% vs -44.8% |
TYRA vs NUVL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NUVL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TYRA and NUVL operate at a comparable scale, with $0 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$132M | -$346M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$120M | -$450M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$95M | -$313M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -32.6% | -17.8% |
Valuation Metrics
NUVL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.8B | $7.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.7B | $7.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -16.37x | -17.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.57x | 5.96x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NUVL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TYRA delivers a -41.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-41 in annual profit, vs $-43 for NUVL.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -41.2% | -42.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -38.4% | -37.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -44.8% | -32.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -43.3% | -34.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$72M | -$262M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $77M | $262M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -26.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NUVL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NUVL five years ago would be worth $54,613 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,654 for TYRA. Over the past 12 months, TYRA leads with a +260.4% total return vs NUVL's +53.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NUVL at 39.5% vs TYRA's 34.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +22.8% | +1.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +260.4% | +53.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +143.7% | +171.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.5% | +446.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.5% | +446.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +34.6% | +39.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TYRA and NUVL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TYRA is the less volatile stock with a 0.75 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NUVL's 1.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NUVL currently trades 90.6% from its 52-week high vs TYRA's 80.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.75x | 1.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $40.65 | $113.02 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.75 | $63.56 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.9% | +90.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.1 | 52.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 544K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TYRA as "Buy" and NUVL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 53.5% upside for TYRA (target: $51) vs 41.0% for NUVL (target: $144).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $50.50 | $144.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
NUVL leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
TYRA vs NUVL: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TYRA or NUVL a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Tyra Biosciences, Inc.
(TYRA) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TYRA or NUVL?
Over the past 5 years, Nuvalent, Inc.
(NUVL) delivered a total return of +446. 1%, compared to +26. 5% for Tyra Biosciences, Inc. (TYRA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NUVL returned +446. 1% versus TYRA's +26. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TYRA or NUVL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tyra Biosciences, Inc.
(TYRA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 75β versus Nuvalent, Inc. 's 1. 09β — meaning NUVL is approximately 45% more volatile than TYRA relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — TYRA or NUVL?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tyra Biosciences, Inc.
grew EPS -33. 1% year-over-year, compared to -48. 9% for Nuvalent, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — TYRA or NUVL?
Tyra Biosciences, Inc.
(TYRA) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus 0. 0% for Nuvalent, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TYRA leads at 0. 0% versus 0. 0% for NUVL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TYRA leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — TYRA or NUVL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is TYRA or NUVL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Tyra Biosciences, Inc.
(TYRA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 75)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TYRA: +26. 5%, NUVL: +446. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between TYRA and NUVL?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.