UHT vs HR

For growth investors, Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT) is the stronger pick with 0.

2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 9% for Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated (HR). Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT) offers the better valuation at 31. 8x trailing P/E (23. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT) a "Hold" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated (HR) delivered a total return of +3.

8%, compared to -18. 1% for Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HR returned +41. 5% versus UHT's +20. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated (HR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

13β versus Universal Health Realty Income Trust's 0. 24β — meaning UHT is approximately 79% more volatile than HR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated (HR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 89% versus 3% for Universal Health Realty Income Trust — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT) is pulling ahead at 0.

2% versus -6. 9% for Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated (HR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated grew EPS 60. 8% year-over-year, compared to -8. 6% for Universal Health Realty Income Trust. Over a 3-year CAGR, HR leads at 8. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT) is the more profitable company, earning 17.

8% net margin versus -20. 8% for Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated — meaning it keeps 17. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UHT leads at 35. 0% versus 8. 0% for HR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UHT leads at 94. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT) offers the highest yield at 7. 3%, versus 5. 5% for Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated (HR).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated (HR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

13), 5. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HR: +41. 5%, UHT: +20. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.