UP vs FLYW vs SOAR

For growth investors, Volato Group, Inc.

(SOAR) is the stronger pick with 30. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 0% for Wheels Up Experience Inc. (UP). Flywire Corporation (FLYW) offers the better valuation at 161. 2x trailing P/E (49. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Flywire Corporation (FLYW) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Flywire Corporation (FLYW) delivered a total return of -49.

5%, compared to -99. 9% for Volato Group, Inc. (SOAR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FLYW returned -49. 5% versus SOAR's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Flywire Corporation (FLYW) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

32β versus Wheels Up Experience Inc. 's 2. 50β — meaning UP is approximately 90% more volatile than FLYW relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Volato Group, Inc.

(SOAR) is pulling ahead at 30. 1% versus -7. 0% for Wheels Up Experience Inc. (UP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flywire Corporation grew EPS 391. 1% year-over-year, compared to 14. 3% for Wheels Up Experience Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SOAR leads at 252. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Flywire Corporation (FLYW) is the more profitable company, earning 2.

2% net margin versus -87. 8% for Volato Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FLYW leads at 1. 8% versus -34. 3% for UP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FLYW leads at 61. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UP: 7373.

8% to $500. 00.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Flywire Corporation (FLYW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.

Volato Group, Inc. (SOAR) carries a higher beta of 2. 30 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FLYW: -49. 5%, SOAR: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (UP (Industrials) and FLYW (Technology) and SOAR (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: UP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FLYW is a small-cap high-growth stock; SOAR is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.