Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
VAC vs MAR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Travel Lodging
VAC vs MAR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Travel Lodging |
| Market Cap | $2.65B | $93.23B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.64B | $26.58B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-342M | $2.58B |
| Gross Margin | 50.3% | 21.4% |
| Operating Margin | 10.8% | 16.0% |
| Forward P/E | 10.3x | 30.4x |
| Total Debt | $5.75B | $17.08B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $733M | $358M |
VAC vs MAR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marriott Vacations … (VAC) | 100 | 85.9 | -14.1% |
| Marriott Internatio… (MAR) | 100 | 397.6 | +297.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VAC vs MAR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VAC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.83, yield 4.1%
- Beta 1.83, yield 4.1%, current ratio 17.74x
- Lower P/E (10.3x vs 30.4x)
MAR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 4.3%, EPS growth 13.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.0%
- 430.3% 10Y total return vs VAC's 61.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.09, current ratio 0.43x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.3% revenue growth vs VAC's 1.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.3x vs 30.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.7% margin vs VAC's -7.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.09 vs VAC's 1.83 | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs MAR's 0.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +38.5% vs VAC's +38.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.3% ROA vs VAC's -3.5%, ROIC 25.0% vs 5.7% |
VAC vs MAR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
VAC vs MAR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MAR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MAR is the larger business by revenue, generating $26.6B annually — 5.7x VAC's $4.6B. MAR is the more profitable business, keeping 9.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VAC's -7.4%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.6B | $26.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $591M | $4.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$342M | $2.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$23M | $3.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.3% | +21.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.8% | +16.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.4% | +9.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.5% | +11.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.8% | +6.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -56.6% | +0.8% |
Valuation Metrics
VAC leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, VAC's 10.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MAR's 24.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.6B | $93.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.7B | $110.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.74x | 37.08x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.34x | 30.38x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.91x | 24.77x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.53x | 3.56x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.35x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 35.75x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MAR leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MAR scores 7/9 vs VAC's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -15.3% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.5% | +9.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.7% | +25.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.1% | +22.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.89x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.0B | $16.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $733M | $358M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.8B | $17.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.31x | 5.20x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MAR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MAR five years ago would be worth $24,578 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,118 for VAC. Over the past 12 months, MAR leads with a +38.5% total return vs VAC's +38.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MAR at 26.4% vs VAC's -12.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +32.5% | +12.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +38.0% | +38.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.9% | +101.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -48.8% | +145.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +61.5% | +430.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -12.4% | +26.4% |
Risk & Volatility
MAR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MAR is the less volatile stock with a 1.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VAC's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MAR currently trades 92.6% from its 52-week high vs VAC's 89.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.83x | 1.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $86.33 | $380.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $44.58 | $250.79 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.4% | +92.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.1 | 53.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 560K | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
VAC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates VAC as "Buy" and MAR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 6.5% upside for VAC (target: $82) vs 5.9% for MAR (target: $373). For income investors, VAC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.09% vs MAR's 0.76%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $82.20 | $372.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 52 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.1% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.15 | $2.67 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.3% | +3.5% |
MAR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). VAC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
VAC vs MAR: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VAC or MAR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Marriott International, Inc.
(MAR) is the stronger pick with 4. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 3% for Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation (VAC). Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) offers the better valuation at 37. 1x trailing P/E (30. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation (VAC) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VAC or MAR?
On forward P/E, Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation is actually cheaper at 10.
3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VAC or MAR?
Over the past 5 years, Marriott International, Inc.
(MAR) delivered a total return of +145. 8%, compared to -48. 8% for Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation (VAC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MAR returned +430. 3% versus VAC's +61. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VAC or MAR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Marriott International, Inc.
(MAR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 09β versus Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation's 1. 83β — meaning VAC is approximately 68% more volatile than MAR relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — VAC or MAR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Marriott International, Inc.
(MAR) is pulling ahead at 4. 3% versus 1. 3% for Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation (VAC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Marriott International, Inc. grew EPS 13. 9% year-over-year, compared to -257. 4% for Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MAR leads at 8. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VAC or MAR?
Marriott International, Inc.
(MAR) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 9% net margin versus -6. 1% for Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation — meaning it keeps 9. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MAR leads at 15. 8% versus 11. 0% for VAC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MAR leads at 21. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VAC or MAR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation (VAC) trades at 10.
3x forward P/E versus 30. 4x for Marriott International, Inc. — 20. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VAC: 6. 5% to $82. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — VAC or MAR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation (VAC) offers the highest yield at 4. 1%, versus 0. 8% for Marriott International, Inc. (MAR).
09Is VAC or MAR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Marriott International, Inc.
(MAR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 09), 0. 8% yield, +430. 3% 10Y return). Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation (VAC) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MAR: +430. 3%, VAC: +61. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VAC and MAR?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: VAC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MAR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.