Asset Management
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
VCTR vs VRTS vs DHIL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Asset Management
VCTR vs VRTS vs DHIL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $5.27B | $960M | $473M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.31B | $831M | $158M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $330M | $138M | $49M |
| Gross Margin | 71.1% | 74.9% | 96.0% |
| Operating Margin | 42.5% | 17.4% | 38.4% |
| Forward P/E | 12.0x | 5.6x | 9.5x |
| Total Debt | $970M | $2.84B | $6.40B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $164M | $477M | $42M |
VCTR vs VRTS vs DHIL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory Capital Hol… (VCTR) | 100 | 492.5 | +392.5% |
| Virtus Investment P… (VRTS) | 100 | 154.2 | +54.2% |
| Diamond Hill Invest… (DHIL) | 100 | 164.0 | +64.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VCTR vs VRTS vs DHIL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VCTR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 46.2%, EPS growth -6.8%
- 6.7% 10Y total return vs VRTS's 159.1%
- 46.2% NII/revenue growth vs VRTS's -8.0%
VRTS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 1.14, yield 6.5%
- PEG 0.38 vs DHIL's 1.14
- NIM 0.9% vs DHIL's 0.7%
DHIL is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.57, current ratio 75115.85x
- Beta 0.57, yield 5.7%, current ratio 75115.85x
- Beta 0.57 vs VCTR's 1.32
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 46.2% NII/revenue growth vs VRTS's -8.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.6x vs 9.5x), PEG 0.38 vs 1.14 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs DHIL's 0.6% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.57 vs VCTR's 1.32 | |
| Dividends | 6.5% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs VCTR's 2.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.8% vs VRTS's -4.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs DHIL's 0.6% |
VCTR vs VRTS vs DHIL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
VCTR vs VRTS vs DHIL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DHIL leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VCTR is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.3B annually — 8.3x DHIL's $158M. DHIL is the more profitable business, keeping 30.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VRTS's 16.7%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $831M | $158M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $628M | $205M | $62M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $330M | $138M | $49M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $381M | -$67M | $44.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +71.1% | +74.9% | +96.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +42.5% | +17.4% | +38.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +25.3% | +16.7% | +30.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.1% | -8.9% | -57.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.8% | +10.9% | +25.3% |
Valuation Metrics
VRTS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.2x trailing earnings, VRTS trades at a 64% valuation discount to VCTR's 20.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), VRTS offers better value at 0.49x vs VCTR's 2.80x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.3B | $960M | $473M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.1B | $3.3B | $6.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.17x | 7.18x | 9.77x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.03x | 5.61x | 9.48x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.80x | 0.49x | 1.18x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.68x | 16.25x | 110.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.04x | 1.16x | 3.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.25x | 0.96x | 2.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.25x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
VCTR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DHIL delivers a 27.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $14 for VRTS. VCTR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.40x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DHIL's 36.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DHIL scores 6/9 vs VCTR's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.7% | +13.5% | +27.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.6% | +3.6% | +19.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.2% | +3.0% | +1.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.8% | +3.7% | +26.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.40x | 2.74x | 36.26x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $806M | $2.4B | $6.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $164M | $477M | $42M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $970M | $2.8B | $6.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.52x | 2.15x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VCTR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VCTR five years ago would be worth $31,503 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,525 for VRTS. Over the past 12 months, VCTR leads with a +44.8% total return vs VRTS's -4.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VCTR at 42.2% vs VRTS's 0.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +29.1% | -8.8% | +2.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +44.8% | -4.2% | +35.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +187.5% | +1.1% | +22.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +215.0% | -34.8% | +28.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +670.8% | +159.1% | +52.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +42.2% | +0.4% | +7.0% |
Risk & Volatility
DHIL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DHIL is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VCTR's 1.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DHIL currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs VRTS's 66.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.32x | 1.14x | 0.57x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $83.38 | $215.06 | $175.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $57.03 | $121.61 | $114.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.7% | +66.7% | +100.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 74.4 | 55.1 | 70.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 687K | 100K | 23K |
Analyst Outlook
VRTS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VCTR as "Buy", VRTS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 13.7% upside for VRTS (target: $163) vs -5.2% for VCTR (target: $78). For income investors, VRTS offers the higher dividend yield at 6.50% vs VCTR's 2.30%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $78.00 | $163.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 11 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.3% | +6.5% | +5.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 7 | 7 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.89 | $9.32 | $9.98 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.7% | +6.2% | +3.6% |
DHIL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). VRTS leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
VCTR vs VRTS vs DHIL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VCTR or VRTS or DHIL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Victory Capital Holdings, Inc.
(VCTR) is the stronger pick with 46. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 0% for Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS). Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS) offers the better valuation at 7. 2x trailing P/E (5. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Victory Capital Holdings, Inc. (VCTR) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VCTR or VRTS or DHIL?
On trailing P/E, Virtus Investment Partners, Inc.
(VRTS) is the cheapest at 7. 2x versus Victory Capital Holdings, Inc. at 20. 2x. On forward P/E, Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. wins at 0. 38x versus Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. 's 1. 14x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VCTR or VRTS or DHIL?
Over the past 5 years, Victory Capital Holdings, Inc.
(VCTR) delivered a total return of +215. 0%, compared to -34. 8% for Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VCTR returned +670. 8% versus DHIL's +52. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VCTR or VRTS or DHIL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
(DHIL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 57β versus Victory Capital Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 32β — meaning VCTR is approximately 130% more volatile than DHIL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Victory Capital Holdings, Inc. (VCTR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 40% versus 36% for Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VCTR or VRTS or DHIL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Victory Capital Holdings, Inc.
(VCTR) is pulling ahead at 46. 2% versus -8. 0% for Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. grew EPS 18. 2% year-over-year, compared to -6. 8% for Victory Capital Holdings, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VCTR or VRTS or DHIL?
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
(DHIL) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 9% net margin versus 16. 7% for Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VCTR leads at 42. 5% versus 17. 4% for VRTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DHIL leads at 96. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VCTR or VRTS or DHIL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 38x versus Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. 's 1. 14x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS) trades at 5. 6x forward P/E versus 12. 0x for Victory Capital Holdings, Inc. — 6. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VRTS: 13. 7% to $163. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — VCTR or VRTS or DHIL?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS) offers the highest yield at 6. 5%, versus 2. 3% for Victory Capital Holdings, Inc. (VCTR).
09Is VCTR or VRTS or DHIL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
(DHIL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 57), 5. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DHIL: +52. 8%, VRTS: +159. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VCTR and VRTS and DHIL?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: VCTR is a small-cap high-growth stock; VRTS is a small-cap deep-value stock; DHIL is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.