Asset Management
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
VCTR vs VRTS vs DHIL vs GROW vs AMG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Asset Management
Asset Management - Global
Asset Management
VCTR vs VRTS vs DHIL vs GROW vs AMG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management - Global | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $5.36B | $949M | $473M | $35M | $7.95B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.31B | $831M | $158M | $8M | $2.45B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $452M | $138M | $49M | $98K | $717M |
| Gross Margin | 71.1% | 74.9% | 96.0% | 41.7% | 86.0% |
| Operating Margin | 42.5% | 17.4% | 38.4% | -35.3% | 31.8% |
| Forward P/E | 12.2x | 5.5x | 9.5x | — | 9.0x |
| Total Debt | $970M | $2.84B | $6.40B | $83K | $2.69B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $164M | $477M | $42M | $25M | $586M |
VCTR vs VRTS vs DHIL vs GROW vs AMG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory Capital Hol… (VCTR) | 100 | 500.8 | +400.8% |
| Virtus Investment P… (VRTS) | 100 | 152.5 | +52.5% |
| Diamond Hill Invest… (DHIL) | 100 | 164.0 | +64.0% |
| U.S. Global Investo… (GROW) | 100 | 125.4 | +25.4% |
| Affiliated Managers… (AMG) | 100 | 447.0 | +347.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VCTR vs VRTS vs DHIL vs GROW vs AMG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VCTR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 6.8% 10Y total return vs AMG's 86.2%
- 46.2% NII/revenue growth vs GROW's -23.1%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs GROW's 0.8% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs GROW's 0.8%
VRTS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and bank quality.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 1.14, yield 6.6%
- NIM 0.9% vs DHIL's 0.7%
- 6.6% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs VCTR's 2.3%
DHIL is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.57, yield 5.7%, current ratio 75115.85x
- Beta 0.57 vs VCTR's 1.32
GROW is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.71, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 20.87x
AMG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Rev growth 19.8%, EPS growth 50.3%
- PEG 0.23 vs VCTR's 1.70
- Lower P/E (9.0x vs 9.5x), PEG 0.23 vs 1.14
- +70.0% vs VRTS's -5.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 46.2% NII/revenue growth vs GROW's -23.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.0x vs 9.5x), PEG 0.23 vs 1.14 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs GROW's 0.8% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.57 vs VCTR's 1.32 | |
| Dividends | 6.6% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs VCTR's 2.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +70.0% vs VRTS's -5.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs GROW's 0.8% |
VCTR vs VRTS vs DHIL vs GROW vs AMG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
VCTR vs VRTS vs DHIL vs GROW vs AMG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GROW leads in 1 of 6 categories
VCTR leads 1 • DHIL leads 1 • VRTS leads 1 • AMG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — DHIL and AMG each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMG is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.4B annually — 289.4x GROW's $8M. DHIL is the more profitable business, keeping 30.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GROW's -4.0%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $831M | $158M | $8M | $2.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $707M | $205M | $62M | -$2M | $855M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $452M | $138M | $49M | $98,000 | $717M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $422M | -$67M | $44.5B | -$235,000 | $978M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +71.1% | +74.9% | +96.0% | +41.7% | +86.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +42.5% | +17.4% | +38.4% | -35.3% | +31.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +25.3% | +16.7% | +30.9% | -4.0% | +29.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.1% | -8.9% | -57.4% | -9.8% | +41.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +38.5% | +10.9% | +25.3% | — | +149.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — VRTS and GROW and AMG each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.1x trailing earnings, VRTS trades at a 65% valuation discount to VCTR's 20.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AMG offers better value at 0.33x vs VCTR's 2.84x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.4B | $949M | $473M | $35M | $7.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.2B | $3.3B | $6.8B | $10M | $10.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.51x | 7.10x | 9.77x | -104.80x | 13.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.24x | 5.55x | 9.48x | — | 8.98x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.84x | 0.48x | 1.18x | — | 0.33x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.82x | 16.20x | 110.39x | — | 10.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.10x | 1.14x | 3.00x | 4.14x | 3.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.29x | 0.95x | 2.70x | 0.77x | 2.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.63x | — | — | — | 7.91x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GROW leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DHIL delivers a 27.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $0 for GROW. GROW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DHIL's 36.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMG scores 8/9 vs GROW's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18.7% | +13.5% | +27.0% | +0.2% | +16.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.7% | +3.6% | +19.5% | +0.2% | +8.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.2% | +3.0% | +1.3% | -4.7% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.8% | +3.7% | +26.0% | -6.2% | +8.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.40x | 2.74x | 36.26x | 0.00x | 0.61x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $806M | $2.4B | $6.4B | -$24M | $2.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $164M | $477M | $42M | $25M | $586M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $970M | $2.8B | $6.4B | $83,000 | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.35x | 2.15x | — | 600.00x | 9.69x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VCTR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VCTR five years ago would be worth $30,385 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,143 for GROW. Over the past 12 months, AMG leads with a +70.0% total return vs VRTS's -5.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VCTR at 43.0% vs VRTS's 0.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +31.3% | -9.8% | +2.8% | +7.7% | +3.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +46.1% | -5.5% | +33.8% | +27.8% | +70.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +192.1% | +0.1% | +22.4% | +3.3% | +109.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +203.8% | -35.0% | +28.3% | -58.6% | +71.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +682.9% | +142.6% | +55.4% | +67.4% | +86.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +43.0% | +0.0% | +7.0% | +1.1% | +28.0% |
Risk & Volatility
DHIL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DHIL is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VCTR's 1.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DHIL currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs VRTS's 65.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.32x | 1.14x | 0.57x | 0.71x | 1.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $88.42 | $215.06 | $175.03 | $3.65 | $334.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $57.03 | $121.61 | $114.11 | $2.10 | $172.54 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.7% | +65.9% | +100.0% | +71.8% | +88.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 75.9 | 55.4 | 70.5 | 46.5 | 61.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 695K | 101K | 23K | 25K | 345K |
Analyst Outlook
VRTS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VCTR as "Buy", VRTS as "Hold", AMG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 15.0% upside for VRTS (target: $163) vs -6.8% for VCTR (target: $78). For income investors, VRTS offers the higher dividend yield at 6.58% vs VCTR's 2.26%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | — | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $78.00 | $163.00 | — | — | $331.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 11 | — | — | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.3% | +6.6% | +5.7% | +3.5% | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 7 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.89 | $9.32 | $9.98 | $0.09 | $0.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.7% | +6.3% | +3.6% | +5.6% | +8.9% |
GROW leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). VCTR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
VCTR vs VRTS vs DHIL vs GROW vs AMG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VCTR or VRTS or DHIL or GROW or AMG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Victory Capital Holdings, Inc.
(VCTR) is the stronger pick with 46. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 1% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW). Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS) offers the better valuation at 7. 1x trailing P/E (5. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Victory Capital Holdings, Inc. (VCTR) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VCTR or VRTS or DHIL or GROW or AMG?
On trailing P/E, Virtus Investment Partners, Inc.
(VRTS) is the cheapest at 7. 1x versus Victory Capital Holdings, Inc. at 20. 5x. On forward P/E, Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. wins at 0. 23x versus Victory Capital Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 70x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VCTR or VRTS or DHIL or GROW or AMG?
Over the past 5 years, Victory Capital Holdings, Inc.
(VCTR) delivered a total return of +203. 8%, compared to -58. 6% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VCTR returned +682. 9% versus DHIL's +55. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VCTR or VRTS or DHIL or GROW or AMG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
(DHIL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 57β versus Victory Capital Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 32β — meaning VCTR is approximately 130% more volatile than DHIL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 36% for Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VCTR or VRTS or DHIL or GROW or AMG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Victory Capital Holdings, Inc.
(VCTR) is pulling ahead at 46. 2% versus -23. 1% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. grew EPS 50. 3% year-over-year, compared to -126. 6% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VCTR or VRTS or DHIL or GROW or AMG?
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
(DHIL) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 9% net margin versus -4. 0% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VCTR leads at 42. 5% versus -35. 3% for GROW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DHIL leads at 96. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VCTR or VRTS or DHIL or GROW or AMG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. (AMG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 23x versus Victory Capital Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 70x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS) trades at 5. 5x forward P/E versus 12. 2x for Victory Capital Holdings, Inc. — 6. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VRTS: 15. 0% to $163. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — VCTR or VRTS or DHIL or GROW or AMG?
In this comparison, VRTS (6.
6% yield), DHIL (5. 7% yield), GROW (3. 5% yield), VCTR (2. 3% yield) pay a dividend. AMG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is VCTR or VRTS or DHIL or GROW or AMG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
(DHIL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 57), 5. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DHIL: +55. 4%, AMG: +86. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VCTR and VRTS and DHIL and GROW and AMG?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: VCTR is a small-cap high-growth stock; VRTS is a small-cap deep-value stock; DHIL is a small-cap deep-value stock; GROW is a small-cap income-oriented stock; AMG is a small-cap high-growth stock. VCTR, VRTS, DHIL, GROW pay a dividend while AMG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.