VFS
VinFast Auto Ltd.
Auto - Manufacturers
Market Cap$9.99B
5Y Perf.-87.7%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
VFS vs XPEV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
XPEV
XPeng Inc.
Auto - Manufacturers
Market Cap$5.42B
5Y Perf.-12.6%
VFS vs XPEV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | VFS | XPEV |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Manufacturers | Auto - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $9.99B | $5.42B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $90.43T | $60.29B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-97.04T | $-4.28B |
| Gross Margin | -42.5% | 15.7% |
| Operating Margin | -79.2% | -8.9% |
| Total Debt | $109.86T | $15.94B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10.92T | $18.59B |
VFS vs XPEV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
VFS
XPEV
| Stock | Aug 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| VinFast Auto Ltd. (VFS) | 100 | 12.3 | -87.7% |
| XPeng Inc. (XPEV) | 100 | 87.4 | -12.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VFS vs XPEV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: VFS leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. XPeng Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
VFS
VinFast Auto Ltd.
The Income Pick
VFS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.70
- Rev growth 105.4%, EPS growth -25.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 86.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.70, current ratio 0.51x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
XPEV
XPeng Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
XPEV is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -26.7% 10Y total return vs VFS's -59.1%
- -7.1% margin vs VFS's -107.3%
- -5.0% ROA vs VFS's -55.1%, ROIC -16.9% vs -188.2%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | VFS | 105.4% revenue growth vs XPEV's 33.2% |
| Quality / Margins | XPEV | -7.1% margin vs VFS's -107.3% |
| Stability / Safety | VFS | Beta 0.70 vs XPEV's 1.39 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | VFS | +14.8% vs XPEV's -18.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | XPEV | -5.0% ROA vs VFS's -55.1%, ROIC -16.9% vs -188.2% |
VFS vs XPEV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2024
VFS vs XPEV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLXPEVLAGGINGVFS
VFSVinFast Auto Ltd.
1leads
XPEVXPeng Inc.
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs VFSMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
XPEV5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
XPEV2/2
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
XPEV5/7
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
XPEV4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
VFS2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XPEV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VFS is the larger business by revenue, generating $90.43T annually — 1499.8x XPEV's $60.3B. XPEV is the more profitable business, keeping -7.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VFS's -107.3%. On growth, VFS holds the edge at +138.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | VFSVinFast Auto Ltd. | XPEVXPeng Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $90.43T | $60.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$60.12T | -$3.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$97.04T | -$4.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$67.94T | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -42.5% | +15.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -79.2% | -8.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -107.3% | -7.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -75.1% | -10.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +138.9% | +125.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -14.8% | +63.2% |
XPEV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
XPEV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | VFSVinFast Auto Ltd. | XPEVXPeng Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10.0B | $5.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.7B | $5.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.71x | -17.29x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.91x | 0.90x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 3.20x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
XPEV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
XPEV leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VFS scores 5/9 vs XPEV's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | VFSVinFast Auto Ltd. | XPEVXPeng Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -13.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -55.1% | -5.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -188.2% | -16.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -70.9% | -14.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.51x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $98.94T | -$2.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10.92T | $18.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $109.86T | $15.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.34x | -10.29x |
XPEV leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
XPEV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in XPEV five years ago would be worth $5,826 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,086 for VFS. Over the past 12 months, VFS leads with a +14.8% total return vs XPEV's -18.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors XPEV at 13.8% vs VFS's -25.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | VFSVinFast Auto Ltd. | XPEVXPeng Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +26.3% | -23.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +14.8% | -18.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.1% | +47.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.1% | -41.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.1% | -26.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -25.8% | +13.8% |
XPEV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VFS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VFS is the less volatile stock with a 0.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than XPEV's 1.39 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VFS currently trades 80.8% from its 52-week high vs XPEV's 55.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | VFSVinFast Auto Ltd. | XPEVXPeng Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.70x | 1.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.29 | $28.24 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.78 | $15.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.8% | +55.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.6 | 40.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 814K | 6.4M |
VFS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates VFS as "Buy" and XPEV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 64.0% upside for XPEV (target: $26) vs 52.2% for VFS (target: $7).
| Metric | VFSVinFast Auto Ltd. | XPEVXPeng Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.50 | $25.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
XPEV leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). VFS leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility).
Best OverallXPeng Inc. (XPEV)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
VFS vs XPEV: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VFS or XPEV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, VinFast Auto Ltd.
(VFS) is the stronger pick with 105. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 33. 2% for XPeng Inc. (XPEV). Analysts rate VinFast Auto Ltd. (VFS) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — VFS or XPEV?
Over the past 5 years, XPeng Inc.
(XPEV) delivered a total return of -41. 7%, compared to -59. 1% for VinFast Auto Ltd. (VFS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XPEV returned -26. 7% versus VFS's -59. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — VFS or XPEV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), VinFast Auto Ltd.
(VFS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 70β versus XPeng Inc. 's 1. 39β — meaning XPEV is approximately 99% more volatile than VFS relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — VFS or XPEV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), VinFast Auto Ltd.
(VFS) is pulling ahead at 105. 4% versus 33. 2% for XPeng Inc. (XPEV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: XPeng Inc. grew EPS 48. 7% year-over-year, compared to -25. 6% for VinFast Auto Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VFS leads at 86. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — VFS or XPEV?
XPeng Inc.
(XPEV) is the more profitable company, earning -14. 2% net margin versus -107. 3% for VinFast Auto Ltd. — meaning it keeps -14. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: XPEV leads at -16. 3% versus -79. 2% for VFS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — XPEV leads at 14. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — VFS or XPEV?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is VFS or XPEV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, VinFast Auto Ltd.
(VFS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 70)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VFS: -59. 1%, XPEV: -26. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between VFS and XPEV?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(VFS: 138.9% · XPEV: 125.3%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.