REIT - Office
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
VNO vs KRC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Office
VNO vs KRC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Office | REIT - Office |
| Market Cap | $5.94B | $4.16B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.81B | $1.11B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $795M | $276M |
| Gross Margin | 73.2% | 67.0% |
| Operating Margin | 13.3% | 28.4% |
| Forward P/E | 371.3x | 84.8x |
| Total Debt | $7.89B | $4.84B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $841M | $179M |
VNO vs KRC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) | 100 | 87.2 | -12.8% |
| Kilroy Realty Corpo… (KRC) | 100 | 61.4 | -38.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VNO vs KRC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VNO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 1.3%, EPS growth 104.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.2%
- 1.3% FFO/revenue growth vs KRC's -2.0%
- 44.0% margin vs KRC's 24.8%
KRC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 6.2%
- -13.2% 10Y total return vs VNO's -33.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 85.9%, current ratio 4.24x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.3% FFO/revenue growth vs KRC's -2.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (84.8x vs 371.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 44.0% margin vs KRC's 24.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs VNO's 1.19, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.2% yield, vs VNO's 2.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +20.9% vs VNO's -15.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.4% ROA vs KRC's 2.5%, ROIC 1.4% vs 2.3% |
VNO vs KRC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
VNO vs KRC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VNO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VNO is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.8B annually — 1.6x KRC's $1.1B. VNO is the more profitable business, keeping 44.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KRC's 24.8%. On growth, VNO holds the edge at -0.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.8B | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $719M | $661M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $795M | $276M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.3B | $7M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +73.2% | +67.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.3% | +28.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +44.0% | +24.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +69.4% | +0.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.5% | -4.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -127.9% | -78.0% |
Valuation Metrics
KRC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.5x trailing earnings, VNO trades at a 50% valuation discount to KRC's 15.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, KRC's 13.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than VNO's 17.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.9B | $4.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.0B | $8.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.51x | 15.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 371.29x | 84.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.07x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.22x | 13.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.28x | 3.74x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.89x | 0.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.72x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
KRC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VNO delivers a 11.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $5 for KRC. KRC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.86x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VNO's 1.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VNO scores 7/9 vs KRC's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.8% | +4.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.4% | +2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.4% | +2.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.8% | +3.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.16x | 0.86x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7.0B | $4.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $841M | $179M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7.9B | $4.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.63x | 2.51x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VNO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VNO five years ago would be worth $7,992 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,837 for KRC. Over the past 12 months, KRC leads with a +20.9% total return vs VNO's -15.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VNO at 34.2% vs KRC's 14.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.7% | -6.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -15.8% | +20.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +141.8% | +48.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -20.1% | -31.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.7% | -13.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +34.2% | +14.0% |
Risk & Volatility
KRC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KRC is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VNO's 1.19 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KRC currently trades 77.9% from its 52-week high vs VNO's 72.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.19x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $43.37 | $45.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $24.57 | $27.36 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +72.8% | +77.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.5 | 64.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.0M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — VNO and KRC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates VNO as "Hold" and KRC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 18.8% upside for VNO (target: $38) vs 7.5% for KRC (target: $38). For income investors, KRC offers the higher dividend yield at 6.17% vs VNO's 2.33%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $37.50 | $37.71 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 28 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.3% | +6.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.74 | $2.17 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | +0.2% |
KRC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). VNO leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). 1 tied.
VNO vs KRC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VNO or KRC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) is the stronger pick with 1.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 0% for Kilroy Realty Corporation (KRC). Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) offers the better valuation at 7. 5x trailing P/E (371. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) a "Hold" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VNO or KRC?
On trailing P/E, Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) is the cheapest at 7.
5x versus Kilroy Realty Corporation at 15. 1x. On forward P/E, Kilroy Realty Corporation is actually cheaper at 84. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VNO or KRC?
Over the past 5 years, Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) delivered a total return of -20.
1%, compared to -31. 6% for Kilroy Realty Corporation (KRC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KRC returned -13. 2% versus VNO's -33. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VNO or KRC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kilroy Realty Corporation (KRC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
83β versus Vornado Realty Trust's 1. 19β — meaning VNO is approximately 43% more volatile than KRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kilroy Realty Corporation (KRC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 86% versus 116% for Vornado Realty Trust — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VNO or KRC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) is pulling ahead at 1.
3% versus -2. 0% for Kilroy Realty Corporation (KRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vornado Realty Trust grew EPS 104. 0% year-over-year, compared to 31. 1% for Kilroy Realty Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, KRC leads at 0. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VNO or KRC?
Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) is the more profitable company, earning 50.
0% net margin versus 24. 8% for Kilroy Realty Corporation — meaning it keeps 50. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KRC leads at 28. 4% versus 15. 0% for VNO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VNO leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VNO or KRC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Kilroy Realty Corporation (KRC) trades at 84.
8x forward P/E versus 371. 3x for Vornado Realty Trust — 286. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VNO: 18. 8% to $37. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — VNO or KRC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Kilroy Realty Corporation (KRC) offers the highest yield at 6. 2%, versus 2. 3% for Vornado Realty Trust (VNO).
09Is VNO or KRC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kilroy Realty Corporation (KRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
83), 6. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KRC: -13. 2%, VNO: -33. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VNO and KRC?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.