VYX vs PAX

For growth investors, Patria Investments Limited (PAX) is the stronger pick with 2.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 9% for NCR Voyix Corporation (VYX). NCR Voyix Corporation (VYX) offers the better valuation at 23. 4x trailing P/E (7. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NCR Voyix Corporation (VYX) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, NCR Voyix Corporation (VYX) is the cheapest at 23.

4x versus Patria Investments Limited at 23. 9x. On forward P/E, NCR Voyix Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 8x.

Over the past 5 years, Patria Investments Limited (PAX) delivered a total return of +14.

0%, compared to -75. 8% for NCR Voyix Corporation (VYX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PAX returned -14. 9% versus VYX's -59. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Patria Investments Limited (PAX) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

09β versus NCR Voyix Corporation's 1. 68β — meaning VYX is approximately 54% more volatile than PAX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Patria Investments Limited (PAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 27% versus 139% for NCR Voyix Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Patria Investments Limited (PAX) is pulling ahead at 2.

6% versus -4. 9% for NCR Voyix Corporation (VYX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NCR Voyix Corporation grew EPS 107. 4% year-over-year, compared to 14. 9% for Patria Investments Limited. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Patria Investments Limited (PAX) is the more profitable company, earning 22.

3% net margin versus 1. 6% for NCR Voyix Corporation — meaning it keeps 22. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PAX leads at 34. 2% versus 1. 0% for VYX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PAX leads at 96. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, NCR Voyix Corporation (VYX) trades at 7.

8x forward P/E versus 9. 0x for Patria Investments Limited — 1. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VYX: 77. 8% to $12. 50.

In this comparison, VYX (1.

5% yield) pays a dividend. PAX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Patria Investments Limited (PAX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

09)). NCR Voyix Corporation (VYX) carries a higher beta of 1. 68 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PAX: -14. 9%, VYX: -59. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (VYX (Technology) and PAX (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

VYX pays a dividend while PAX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.