WCC vs FAST

For growth investors, Fastenal Company (FAST) is the stronger pick with 8.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 8% for WESCO International, Inc. (WCC). WESCO International, Inc. (WCC) offers the better valuation at 27. 2x trailing P/E (22. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate WESCO International, Inc. (WCC) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, WESCO International, Inc.

(WCC) is the cheapest at 27. 2x versus Fastenal Company at 40. 5x. On forward P/E, WESCO International, Inc. is actually cheaper at 22. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: WESCO International, Inc. wins at 0. 41x versus Fastenal Company's 4. 59x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, WESCO International, Inc.

(WCC) delivered a total return of +235. 1%, compared to +78. 9% for Fastenal Company (FAST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WCC returned +545. 6% versus FAST's +336. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fastenal Company (FAST) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

65β versus WESCO International, Inc. 's 1. 80β — meaning WCC is approximately 177% more volatile than FAST relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fastenal Company (FAST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 149% for WESCO International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Fastenal Company (FAST) is pulling ahead at 8.

7% versus 7. 8% for WESCO International, Inc. (WCC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fastenal Company grew EPS 9. 0% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for WESCO International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FAST leads at 5. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Fastenal Company (FAST) is the more profitable company, earning 15.

3% net margin versus 2. 7% for WESCO International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FAST leads at 20. 2% versus 5. 2% for WCC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FAST leads at 45. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, WESCO International, Inc. (WCC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 41x versus Fastenal Company's 4. 59x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, WESCO International, Inc. (WCC) trades at 22. 2x forward P/E versus 35. 7x for Fastenal Company — 13. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FAST: 5. 4% to $46. 57.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Fastenal Company (FAST) offers the highest yield at 2. 0%, versus 0. 5% for WESCO International, Inc. (WCC).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Fastenal Company (FAST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

65), 2. 0% yield, +336. 4% 10Y return). WESCO International, Inc. (WCC) carries a higher beta of 1. 80 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FAST: +336. 4%, WCC: +545. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.