Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
WDS vs CVX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Integrated
WDS vs CVX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Integrated |
| Market Cap | $41.65B | $364.18B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $26.15B | $184.43B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6.29B | $12.30B |
| Gross Margin | 37.8% | 30.4% |
| Operating Margin | 32.6% | 9.0% |
| Forward P/E | 10.4x | 15.0x |
| Total Debt | $13.72B | $46.74B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5.71B | $6.47B |
WDS vs CVX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Woodside Energy Gro… (WDS) | 100 | 145.2 | +45.2% |
| Chevron Corporation (CVX) | 100 | 199.0 | +99.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WDS vs CVX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WDS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.07, yield 4.8%
- Rev growth -1.5%, EPS growth -24.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -8.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.07, Low D/E 34.4%, current ratio 1.59x
CVX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 135.8% 10Y total return vs WDS's 72.0%
- Lower D/E ratio (24.3% vs 34.4%)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -1.5% revenue growth vs CVX's -4.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.4x vs 15.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.1% margin vs CVX's 6.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (24.3% vs 34.4%) | |
| Dividends | 4.8% yield, vs CVX's 3.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +77.8% vs CVX's +39.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.5% ROA vs CVX's 4.2%, ROIC 6.3% vs 6.2% |
WDS vs CVX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
WDS vs CVX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WDS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CVX is the larger business by revenue, generating $184.4B annually — 7.1x WDS's $26.2B. WDS is the more profitable business, keeping 24.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CVX's 6.7%. On growth, CVX holds the edge at -5.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $26.2B | $184.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $18.6B | $37.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6.3B | $12.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1.5B | $16.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.8% | +30.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +32.6% | +9.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.1% | +6.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.7% | +8.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.1% | -5.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -15.1% | -24.5% |
Valuation Metrics
WDS leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.4x trailing earnings, WDS trades at a 44% valuation discount to CVX's 27.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WDS's 5.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CVX's 10.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $41.7B | $364.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $49.7B | $404.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.43x | 27.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.36x | 15.02x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.28x | 10.89x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.21x | 1.97x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.05x | 1.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 21.95x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WDS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WDS delivers a 15.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $7 for CVX. CVX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WDS's 0.34x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CVX scores 5/9 vs WDS's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.8% | +7.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.5% | +4.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.3% | +6.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.6% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.34x | 0.24x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8.0B | $40.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5.7B | $6.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13.7B | $46.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 109.20x | 17.22x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CVX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CVX five years ago would be worth $19,396 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,071 for WDS. Over the past 12 months, WDS leads with a +77.8% total return vs CVX's +39.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CVX at 8.2% vs WDS's 3.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +40.6% | +18.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +77.8% | +39.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.7% | +26.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +60.7% | +94.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +72.0% | +135.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.4% | +8.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WDS and CVX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CVX is the less volatile stock with a -0.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WDS's 0.07 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.07x | -0.05x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.19 | $214.71 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.90 | $133.77 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.0% | +85.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.1 | 42.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 11.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WDS and CVX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates WDS as "Hold" and CVX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 27.8% upside for WDS (target: $28) vs 4.6% for CVX (target: $191). For income investors, WDS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.80% vs CVX's 3.76%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $28.00 | $190.93 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 53 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.8% | +3.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.05 | $6.87 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +3.3% |
WDS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CVX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
WDS vs CVX: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WDS or CVX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) is the stronger pick with -1.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 6% for Chevron Corporation (CVX). Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) offers the better valuation at 15. 4x trailing P/E (10. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Chevron Corporation (CVX) a "Buy" — based on 53 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WDS or CVX?
On trailing P/E, Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) is the cheapest at 15.
4x versus Chevron Corporation at 27. 5x. On forward P/E, Woodside Energy Group Ltd is actually cheaper at 10. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WDS or CVX?
Over the past 5 years, Chevron Corporation (CVX) delivered a total return of +94.
0%, compared to +60. 7% for Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CVX returned +135. 8% versus WDS's +72. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WDS or CVX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chevron Corporation (CVX) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
05β versus Woodside Energy Group Ltd's 0. 07β — meaning WDS is approximately -224% more volatile than CVX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chevron Corporation (CVX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 34% for Woodside Energy Group Ltd — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WDS or CVX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) is pulling ahead at -1.
5% versus -4. 6% for Chevron Corporation (CVX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Woodside Energy Group Ltd grew EPS -24. 1% year-over-year, compared to -31. 8% for Chevron Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CVX leads at -7. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WDS or CVX?
Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
9% net margin versus 6. 7% for Chevron Corporation — meaning it keeps 20. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WDS leads at 29. 8% versus 9. 0% for CVX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WDS leads at 34. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WDS or CVX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) trades at 10.
4x forward P/E versus 15. 0x for Chevron Corporation — 4. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WDS: 27. 8% to $28. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — WDS or CVX?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) offers the highest yield at 4. 8%, versus 3. 8% for Chevron Corporation (CVX).
09Is WDS or CVX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Chevron Corporation (CVX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
05), 3. 8% yield, +135. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CVX: +135. 8%, WDS: +72. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WDS and CVX?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: WDS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; CVX is a large-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.