Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
WU vs V
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
WU vs V — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $2.82B | $611.60B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.04B | $40.00B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $441M | $22.24B |
| Gross Margin | 28.7% | 80.4% |
| Operating Margin | 19.4% | 60.0% |
| Forward P/E | 5.1x | 24.4x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $25.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.23B | $20.15B |
WU vs V — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Western Union C… (WU) | 100 | 44.9 | -55.1% |
| Visa Inc. (V) | 100 | 163.3 | +63.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WU vs V
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WU carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.63, yield 10.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.63, current ratio 16.52x
- Beta 0.63, yield 10.5%, current ratio 16.52x
V is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 11.3%, EPS growth 4.8%
- 328.6% 10Y total return vs WU's -7.6%
- 11.3% NII/revenue growth vs WU's -4.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.3% NII/revenue growth vs WU's -4.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.1x vs 24.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs V's 0.2% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.63 vs V's 0.68 | |
| Dividends | 10.5% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs V's 0.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +2.7% vs V's -7.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs V's 0.2% |
WU vs V — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WU vs V — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
V leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
V is the larger business by revenue, generating $40.0B annually — 9.9x WU's $4.0B. V is the more profitable business, keeping 50.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WU's 12.4%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.0B | $40.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $838M | $27.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $441M | $22.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $331M | $21.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.7% | +80.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.4% | +60.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.4% | +50.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.7% | +53.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -44.4% | +35.3% |
Valuation Metrics
WU leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.9x trailing earnings, WU trades at a 81% valuation discount to V's 31.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WU's 1.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than V's 24.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.8B | $611.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.6B | $616.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.87x | 31.25x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 5.10x | 24.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.97x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.67x | 24.46x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.70x | 15.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.07x | 16.53x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.17x | 28.35x |
Profitability & Efficiency
V leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
V delivers a 58.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $59 in annual profit, vs $48 for WU.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +47.9% | +58.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.5% | +22.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +23.3% | +29.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.5% | +36.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.2B | $5.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.2B | $20.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $25.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.11x | 26.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
V leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in V five years ago would be worth $14,202 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,413 for WU. Over the past 12 months, WU leads with a +2.7% total return vs V's -7.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors V at 11.9% vs WU's -1.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.1% | -7.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +2.7% | -7.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.6% | +40.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -45.9% | +42.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -7.6% | +328.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.2% | +11.9% |
Risk & Volatility
WU leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WU is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than V's 0.68 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.63x | 0.68x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.35 | $375.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.85 | $293.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.8% | +84.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.8 | 56.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8.2M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WU and V each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates WU as "Hold" and V as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 13.7% upside for V (target: $362) vs 0.2% for WU (target: $9). For income investors, WU offers the higher dividend yield at 10.50% vs V's 0.74%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.00 | $362.45 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 48 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +10.5% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 11 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.94 | $2.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +8.3% | +2.2% |
V leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). WU leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
WU vs V: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WU or V a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Visa Inc.
(V) is the stronger pick with 11. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 0% for The Western Union Company (WU). The Western Union Company (WU) offers the better valuation at 5. 9x trailing P/E (5. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Visa Inc. (V) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WU or V?
On trailing P/E, The Western Union Company (WU) is the cheapest at 5.
9x versus Visa Inc. at 31. 3x. On forward P/E, The Western Union Company is actually cheaper at 5. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WU or V?
Over the past 5 years, Visa Inc.
(V) delivered a total return of +42. 0%, compared to -45. 9% for The Western Union Company (WU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: V returned +328. 6% versus WU's -7. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WU or V?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Western Union Company (WU) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
63β versus Visa Inc. 's 0. 68β — meaning V is approximately 9% more volatile than WU relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — WU or V?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Visa Inc.
(V) is pulling ahead at 11. 3% versus -4. 0% for The Western Union Company (WU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Visa Inc. grew EPS 4. 8% year-over-year, compared to -44. 2% for The Western Union Company. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WU or V?
Visa Inc.
(V) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 1% net margin versus 12. 4% for The Western Union Company — meaning it keeps 50. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: V leads at 60. 0% versus 19. 4% for WU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — V leads at 80. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WU or V more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, The Western Union Company (WU) trades at 5.
1x forward P/E versus 24. 4x for Visa Inc. — 19. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for V: 13. 7% to $362. 45.
08Which pays a better dividend — WU or V?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
The Western Union Company (WU) offers the highest yield at 10. 5%, versus 0. 7% for Visa Inc. (V).
09Is WU or V better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Visa Inc.
(V) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 68), 0. 7% yield, +328. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (V: +328. 6%, WU: -7. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WU and V?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: WU is a small-cap deep-value stock; V is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.