Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
XOMA vs OMAB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
XOMA vs OMAB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Airlines, Airports & Air Services |
| Market Cap | $490M | $5.16B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $52M | $15.96B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $29M | $5.34B |
| Gross Margin | 94.3% | 75.6% |
| Operating Margin | 21.8% | 56.0% |
| Forward P/E | 36.7x | 0.8x |
| Total Debt | $132M | $13.59B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $83M | $3.10B |
XOMA vs OMAB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMA Royalty Corp. (XOMA) | 100 | 200.2 | +100.2% |
| Grupo Aeroportuario… (OMAB) | 100 | 303.5 | +203.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: XOMA vs OMAB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
XOMA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 83.1%, EPS growth 188.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 105.3%
- 83.1% revenue growth vs OMAB's 5.9%
- 56.4% margin vs OMAB's 33.5%
OMAB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.62, yield 5.0%
- 192.8% 10Y total return vs XOMA's 186.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.62, current ratio 1.32x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 83.1% revenue growth vs OMAB's 5.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.8x vs 36.7x), PEG 0.02 vs 2.75 | |
| Quality / Margins | 56.4% margin vs OMAB's 33.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.62 vs XOMA's 1.21, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.0% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs XOMA's 0.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +68.7% vs OMAB's +16.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.6% ROA vs XOMA's 12.1%, ROIC 31.7% vs 7.4% |
XOMA vs OMAB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XOMA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OMAB is the larger business by revenue, generating $16.0B annually — 306.1x XOMA's $52M. XOMA is the more profitable business, keeping 56.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OMAB's 33.5%. On growth, XOMA holds the edge at +57.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $52M | $16.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $14M | $9.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $29M | $5.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3M | $5.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +94.3% | +75.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.8% | +56.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +56.4% | +33.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.4% | +34.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +57.9% | -0.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +157.8% | +2.6% |
Valuation Metrics
OMAB leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.7x trailing earnings, OMAB trades at a 41% valuation discount to XOMA's 28.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), OMAB offers better value at 0.44x vs XOMA's 2.12x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $490M | $5.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $538M | $5.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 28.28x | 16.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 36.74x | 0.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.12x | 0.44x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 37.50x | 10.14x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.39x | 5.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.85x | 7.79x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 170.55x | 12.09x |
Profitability & Efficiency
OMAB leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OMAB delivers a 50.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $51 in annual profit, vs $32 for XOMA. OMAB carries lower financial leverage with a 1.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to XOMA's 1.57x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OMAB scores 6/9 vs XOMA's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +31.9% | +50.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.1% | +17.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.4% | +31.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.2% | +35.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.57x | 1.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $49M | $10.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $83M | $3.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $132M | $13.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.90x | 6.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
XOMA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OMAB five years ago would be worth $25,778 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,005 for XOMA. Over the past 12 months, XOMA leads with a +68.7% total return vs OMAB's +16.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors XOMA at 31.3% vs OMAB's 11.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +47.5% | -1.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +68.7% | +16.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +126.1% | +40.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +30.0% | +157.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +186.7% | +192.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +31.3% | +11.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — XOMA and OMAB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OMAB is the less volatile stock with a 0.62 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than XOMA's 1.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. XOMA currently trades 96.4% from its 52-week high vs OMAB's 79.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.21x | 0.62x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $42.81 | $134.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.29 | $89.53 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.4% | +79.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.1 | 40.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 242K | 92K |
Analyst Outlook
OMAB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates XOMA as "Buy" and OMAB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.2% upside for XOMA (target: $54) vs 18.7% for OMAB (target: $127). For income investors, OMAB offers the higher dividend yield at 5.02% vs XOMA's 0.74%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $53.75 | $127.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | +5.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.30 | $92.57 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.3% | +0.0% |
OMAB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). XOMA leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). 1 tied.
XOMA vs OMAB: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XOMA or OMAB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, XOMA Royalty Corp.
(XOMA) is the stronger pick with 83. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 9% for Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S. A. B. de C. V. (OMAB). Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S. A. B. de C. V. (OMAB) offers the better valuation at 16. 7x trailing P/E (0. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate XOMA Royalty Corp. (XOMA) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — XOMA or OMAB?
On trailing P/E, Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.
A. B. de C. V. (OMAB) is the cheapest at 16. 7x versus XOMA Royalty Corp. at 28. 3x. On forward P/E, Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S. A. B. de C. V. is actually cheaper at 0. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S. A. B. de C. V. wins at 0. 02x versus XOMA Royalty Corp. 's 2. 75x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — XOMA or OMAB?
Over the past 5 years, Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.
A. B. de C. V. (OMAB) delivered a total return of +157. 8%, compared to +30. 0% for XOMA Royalty Corp. (XOMA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OMAB returned +192. 8% versus XOMA's +186. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — XOMA or OMAB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.
A. B. de C. V. (OMAB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 62β versus XOMA Royalty Corp. 's 1. 21β — meaning XOMA is approximately 95% more volatile than OMAB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S. A. B. de C. V. (OMAB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 119% versus 157% for XOMA Royalty Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — XOMA or OMAB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), XOMA Royalty Corp.
(XOMA) is pulling ahead at 83. 1% versus 5. 9% for Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S. A. B. de C. V. (OMAB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: XOMA Royalty Corp. grew EPS 188. 5% year-over-year, compared to 8. 4% for Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S. A. B. de C. V.. Over a 3-year CAGR, XOMA leads at 105. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — XOMA or OMAB?
XOMA Royalty Corp.
(XOMA) is the more profitable company, earning 60. 8% net margin versus 33. 5% for Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S. A. B. de C. V. — meaning it keeps 60. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OMAB leads at 56. 0% versus 21. 8% for XOMA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — XOMA leads at 94. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is XOMA or OMAB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S. A. B. de C. V. (OMAB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 02x versus XOMA Royalty Corp. 's 2. 75x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S. A. B. de C. V. (OMAB) trades at 0. 8x forward P/E versus 36. 7x for XOMA Royalty Corp. — 36. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for XOMA: 30. 2% to $53. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — XOMA or OMAB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S. A. B. de C. V. (OMAB) offers the highest yield at 5. 0%, versus 0. 7% for XOMA Royalty Corp. (XOMA).
09Is XOMA or OMAB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.
A. B. de C. V. (OMAB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 62), 5. 0% yield, +192. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (OMAB: +192. 8%, XOMA: +186. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between XOMA and OMAB?
These companies operate in different sectors (XOMA (Healthcare) and OMAB (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: XOMA is a small-cap high-growth stock; OMAB is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.