ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
Marine Shipping
Market Cap$3.21B
5Y Perf.+120.8%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
ZIM vs MATX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
MATX
Matson, Inc.
Marine Shipping
Market Cap$5.56B
5Y Perf.+205.6%
ZIM vs MATX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ZIM | MATX |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping |
| Market Cap | $3.21B | $5.56B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.90B | $3.32B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $479M | $429M |
| Gross Margin | 16.8% | 18.4% |
| Operating Margin | 12.3% | 13.6% |
| Forward P/E | 6.7x | 13.1x |
| Total Debt | $5.74B | $727M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.05B | $142M |
ZIM vs MATX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
ZIM
MATX
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZIM Integrated Ship… (ZIM) | 100 | 220.8 | +120.8% |
| Matson, Inc. (MATX) | 100 | 305.6 | +205.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ZIM vs MATX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: ZIM leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. Matson, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
The Income Pick
ZIM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.27, yield 16.1%
- 5.5% 10Y total return vs MATX's 484.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.27, current ratio 1.23x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
MATX
Matson, Inc.
The Growth Play
MATX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth -2.3%, EPS growth -0.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -8.3%
- -2.3% revenue growth vs ZIM's -18.1%
- 12.9% margin vs ZIM's 6.9%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | MATX | -2.3% revenue growth vs ZIM's -18.1% |
| Value | ZIM | Lower P/E (6.7x vs 13.1x) |
| Quality / Margins | MATX | 12.9% margin vs ZIM's 6.9% |
| Stability / Safety | ZIM | Beta 1.27 vs MATX's 1.65 |
| Dividends | ZIM | 16.1% yield, vs MATX's 0.8% |
| Momentum (1Y) | ZIM | +100.7% vs MATX's +85.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MATX | 9.3% ROA vs ZIM's 4.3%, ROIC 10.8% vs 7.3% |
ZIM vs MATX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2022
FY 2025
ZIM vs MATX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLMATXLAGGINGZIM
ZIMZIM Integrated Shippi…
1leads
MATXMatson, Inc.
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs ZIMMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
MATX5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
ZIM5/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
MATX9/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
MATX4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MATX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ZIM is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.9B annually — 2.1x MATX's $3.3B. MATX is the more profitable business, keeping 12.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ZIM's 6.9%. On growth, MATX holds the edge at -3.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ZIMZIM Integrated Sh… | MATXMatson, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.9B | $3.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.1B | $644M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $479M | $429M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.0B | $418M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.8% | +18.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.3% | +13.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.9% | +12.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +29.0% | +12.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -31.5% | -3.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -93.1% | -15.1% |
MATX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
ZIM leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.7x trailing earnings, ZIM trades at a 49% valuation discount to MATX's 13.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ZIM's 3.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MATX's 7.7x.
| Metric | ZIMZIM Integrated Sh… | MATXMatson, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.2B | $5.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.9B | $6.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 6.69x | 13.17x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.07x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.51x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.70x | 7.72x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.46x | 1.66x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.80x | 2.06x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.99x | 36.16x |
ZIM leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MATX leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MATX delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $12 for ZIM. MATX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.26x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ZIM's 1.43x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MATX scores 5/9 vs ZIM's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ZIMZIM Integrated Sh… | MATXMatson, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.0% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.3% | +9.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.3% | +10.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.6% | +11.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.43x | 0.26x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.7B | $585M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.1B | $142M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.7B | $727M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.02x | 127.63x |
MATX leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MATX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MATX five years ago would be worth $29,394 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19,438 for ZIM. Over the past 12 months, ZIM leads with a +100.7% total return vs MATX's +85.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MATX at 41.2% vs ZIM's 27.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ZIMZIM Integrated Sh… | MATXMatson, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +25.5% | +48.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +100.7% | +85.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +107.4% | +181.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +94.4% | +193.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +552.4% | +484.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.5% | +41.2% |
MATX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ZIM and MATX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ZIM is the less volatile stock with a 1.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MATX's 1.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MATX currently trades 96.5% from its 52-week high vs ZIM's 88.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ZIMZIM Integrated Sh… | MATXMatson, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.27x | 1.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.97 | $189.28 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.33 | $86.97 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.8% | +96.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.7 | 58.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.8M | 269K |
Evenly matched — ZIM and MATX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ZIM and MATX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ZIM as "Hold" and MATX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 4.0% upside for MATX (target: $190) vs -44.4% for ZIM (target: $15). For income investors, ZIM offers the higher dividend yield at 16.08% vs MATX's 0.79%.
| Metric | ZIMZIM Integrated Sh… | MATXMatson, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.80 | $190.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +16.1% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $4.28 | $1.44 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.5% |
Evenly matched — ZIM and MATX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
MATX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ZIM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallMatson, Inc. (MATX)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
ZIM vs MATX: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ZIM or MATX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Matson, Inc.
(MATX) is the stronger pick with -2. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 1% for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM). ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) offers the better valuation at 6. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Matson, Inc. (MATX) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ZIM or MATX?
On trailing P/E, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
(ZIM) is the cheapest at 6. 7x versus Matson, Inc. at 13. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ZIM or MATX?
Over the past 5 years, Matson, Inc.
(MATX) delivered a total return of +193. 9%, compared to +94. 4% for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ZIM returned +552. 4% versus MATX's +484. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ZIM or MATX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
(ZIM) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 27β versus Matson, Inc. 's 1. 65β — meaning MATX is approximately 30% more volatile than ZIM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Matson, Inc. (MATX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 26% versus 143% for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ZIM or MATX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Matson, Inc.
(MATX) is pulling ahead at -2. 3% versus -18. 1% for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Matson, Inc. grew EPS -0. 4% year-over-year, compared to -77. 7% for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MATX leads at -8. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ZIM or MATX?
Matson, Inc.
(MATX) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 3% net margin versus 6. 9% for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. — meaning it keeps 13. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MATX leads at 14. 0% versus 12. 2% for ZIM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MATX leads at 22. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ZIM or MATX more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MATX: 4.
0% to $190. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ZIM or MATX?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) offers the highest yield at 16. 1%, versus 0. 8% for Matson, Inc. (MATX).
09Is ZIM or MATX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
(ZIM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 27), 16. 1% yield, +552. 4% 10Y return). Matson, Inc. (MATX) carries a higher beta of 1. 65 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ZIM: +552. 4%, MATX: +484. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ZIM and MATX?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(ZIM: -31.5% · MATX: -3.1%)Net Margin>
%
(ZIM: 6.9% · MATX: 12.9%)P/E Ratio<
x
(ZIM: 6.7x · MATX: 13.2x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.