ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
Marine Shipping
Market Cap$3.15B
5Y Perf.+116.7%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
ZIM vs SBLK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
Marine Shipping
Market Cap$3.09B
5Y Perf.+152.7%
ZIM vs SBLK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ZIM | SBLK |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping |
| Market Cap | $3.15B | $3.09B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.90B | $1.04B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $479M | $84M |
| Gross Margin | 16.8% | 33.0% |
| Operating Margin | 12.3% | 13.6% |
| Forward P/E | 6.6x | 8.0x |
| Total Debt | $5.74B | $1.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.05B | $500M |
ZIM vs SBLK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
ZIM
SBLK
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZIM Integrated Ship… (ZIM) | 100 | 216.7 | +116.7% |
| Star Bulk Carriers … (SBLK) | 100 | 252.7 | +152.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ZIM vs SBLK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: ZIM leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. Star Bulk Carriers Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
The Income Pick
ZIM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.33, yield 16.4%
- Lower P/E (6.6x vs 8.0x)
- 16.4% yield, vs SBLK's 1.1%
Best for: income & stability
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
The Growth Play
SBLK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -17.6%, EPS growth -73.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -10.1%
- 9.8% 10Y total return vs ZIM's 5.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.73, Low D/E 43.8%, current ratio 1.78x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | SBLK | -17.6% revenue growth vs ZIM's -18.1% |
| Value | ZIM | Lower P/E (6.6x vs 8.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | SBLK | 8.1% margin vs ZIM's 6.9% |
| Stability / Safety | SBLK | Beta 0.73 vs ZIM's 1.33, lower leverage |
| Dividends | ZIM | 16.4% yield, vs SBLK's 1.1% |
| Momentum (1Y) | ZIM | +106.6% vs SBLK's +83.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | ZIM | 4.3% ROA vs SBLK's 2.2%, ROIC 7.3% vs 3.2% |
ZIM vs SBLK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2022
Segment breakdown not available.
ZIM vs SBLK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLZIMLAGGINGSBLK
SBLKStar Bulk Carriers Co…
3leads
ZIMZIM Integrated Shippi…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs SBLKMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
SBLK5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
ZIM5/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
SBLK5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
ZIM4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
SBLK2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
ZIM1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SBLK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ZIM is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.9B annually — 6.6x SBLK's $1.0B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 8.1% (SBLK) to 6.9% (ZIM). On growth, SBLK holds the edge at -2.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ZIMZIM Integrated Sh… | SBLKStar Bulk Carrier… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.9B | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.1B | $311M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $479M | $84M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.0B | $209M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.8% | +33.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.3% | +13.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.9% | +8.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +29.0% | +20.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -31.5% | -2.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -93.1% | +58.3% |
SBLK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
ZIM leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.6x trailing earnings, ZIM trades at a 82% valuation discount to SBLK's 36.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ZIM's 3.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SBLK's 11.9x.
| Metric | ZIMZIM Integrated Sh… | SBLKStar Bulk Carrier… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.1B | $3.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.8B | $3.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 6.56x | 36.73x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 8.00x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.75x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.68x | 11.87x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.46x | 2.97x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.78x | 1.26x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.96x | 14.73x |
ZIM leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SBLK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ZIM delivers a 12.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $3 for SBLK. SBLK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.44x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ZIM's 1.43x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SBLK scores 5/9 vs ZIM's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ZIMZIM Integrated Sh… | SBLKStar Bulk Carrier… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.0% | +3.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.3% | +2.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.3% | +3.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.6% | +4.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.43x | 0.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.7B | $572M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.1B | $500M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.7B | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.02x | 2.08x |
SBLK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ZIM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ZIM five years ago would be worth $18,830 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,911 for SBLK. Over the past 12 months, ZIM leads with a +106.6% total return vs SBLK's +83.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ZIM at 26.9% vs SBLK's 17.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ZIMZIM Integrated Sh… | SBLKStar Bulk Carrier… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +23.2% | +40.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +106.6% | +83.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +104.5% | +60.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +88.3% | +79.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +548.1% | +977.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.9% | +17.1% |
ZIM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SBLK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SBLK is the less volatile stock with a 0.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ZIM's 1.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SBLK currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs ZIM's 87.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ZIMZIM Integrated Sh… | SBLKStar Bulk Carrier… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.33x | 0.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.97 | $27.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.33 | $14.79 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.1% | +98.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.3 | 72.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.8M | 1.4M |
SBLK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
ZIM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ZIM as "Hold" and SBLK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.2% upside for SBLK (target: $29) vs -43.3% for ZIM (target: $15). For income investors, ZIM offers the higher dividend yield at 16.39% vs SBLK's 1.11%.
| Metric | ZIMZIM Integrated Sh… | SBLKStar Bulk Carrier… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.80 | $29.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +16.4% | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $4.28 | $0.30 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.2% |
ZIM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
SBLK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ZIM leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).
Best OverallZIM Integrated Shipping Ser… (ZIM)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
ZIM vs SBLK: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ZIM or SBLK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
(SBLK) is the stronger pick with -17. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 1% for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM). ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) offers the better valuation at 6. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ZIM or SBLK?
On trailing P/E, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
(ZIM) is the cheapest at 6. 6x versus Star Bulk Carriers Corp. at 36. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ZIM or SBLK?
Over the past 5 years, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
(ZIM) delivered a total return of +88. 3%, compared to +79. 1% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SBLK returned +977. 3% versus ZIM's +548. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ZIM or SBLK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
(SBLK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 73β versus ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. 's 1. 33β — meaning ZIM is approximately 82% more volatile than SBLK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 44% versus 143% for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ZIM or SBLK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
(SBLK) is pulling ahead at -17. 6% versus -18. 1% for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Star Bulk Carriers Corp. grew EPS -73. 9% year-over-year, compared to -77. 7% for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SBLK leads at -10. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ZIM or SBLK?
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
(SBLK) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 1% net margin versus 6. 9% for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. — meaning it keeps 8. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SBLK leads at 13. 5% versus 12. 2% for ZIM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SBLK leads at 22. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ZIM or SBLK more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SBLK: 8.
2% to $29. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ZIM or SBLK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) offers the highest yield at 16. 4%, versus 1. 1% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK).
09Is ZIM or SBLK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
(SBLK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 1. 1% yield, +977. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SBLK: +977. 3%, ZIM: +548. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ZIM and SBLK?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ZIM is a small-cap deep-value stock; SBLK is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(ZIM: -31.5% · SBLK: -2.7%)Net Margin>
%
(ZIM: 6.9% · SBLK: 8.1%)P/E Ratio<
x
(ZIM: 6.6x · SBLK: 36.7x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.