Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
AAOI vs AVGO vs MRVL vs INTC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
AAOI vs AVGO vs MRVL vs INTC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $12.44B | $1.96T | $138.57B | $550.40B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $507M | $68.28B | $8.19B | $53.76B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-43M | $24.97B | $2.67B | $-3.17B |
| Gross Margin | 29.6% | 67.1% | 51.0% | 35.4% |
| Operating Margin | -11.6% | 40.9% | 16.1% | -9.4% |
| Forward P/E | 167.2x | 36.5x | 41.7x | 105.1x |
| Total Debt | $167M | $65.14B | $4.47B | $46.59B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $216M | $16.18B | $2.64B | $14.27B |
AAOI vs AVGO vs MRVL vs INTC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Applied Optoelectro… (AAOI) | 100 | 1784.3 | +1684.3% |
| Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) | 100 | 1416.3 | +1316.3% |
| Marvell Technology,… (MRVL) | 100 | 490.5 | +390.5% |
| Intel Corporation (INTC) | 100 | 174.2 | +74.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AAOI vs AVGO vs MRVL vs INTC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AAOI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 82.8%, EPS growth 85.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.9%
- 82.8% revenue growth vs INTC's -0.5%
- +10.3% vs AVGO's +102.6%
AVGO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 1.96, yield 0.6%
- 29.0% 10Y total return vs AAOI's 14.4%
- Beta 1.96, yield 0.6%, current ratio 1.71x
- Lower P/E (36.5x vs 105.1x)
MRVL plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
INTC is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.15, Low D/E 36.9%, current ratio 2.02x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 82.8% revenue growth vs INTC's -0.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (36.5x vs 105.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 36.6% margin vs AAOI's -8.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.96 vs AAOI's 4.13 | |
| Dividends | 0.6% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs MRVL's 0.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +10.3% vs AVGO's +102.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.9% ROA vs AAOI's -3.8%, ROIC 14.9% vs -7.9% |
AAOI vs AVGO vs MRVL vs INTC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AAOI vs AVGO vs MRVL vs INTC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AVGO leads in 3 of 6 categories
INTC leads 1 • AAOI leads 1 • MRVL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AVGO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AVGO is the larger business by revenue, generating $68.3B annually — 134.7x AAOI's $507M. AVGO is the more profitable business, keeping 36.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AAOI's -8.5%. On growth, AAOI holds the edge at +51.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $507M | $68.3B | $8.2B | $53.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$37M | $38.8B | $2.3B | $4.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$43M | $25.0B | $2.7B | -$3.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$239M | $28.9B | $1.4B | -$3.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.6% | +67.1% | +51.0% | +35.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -11.6% | +40.9% | +16.1% | -9.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.5% | +36.6% | +32.6% | -5.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -47.1% | +42.3% | +17.0% | -5.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +51.4% | +29.5% | +22.1% | +7.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.6% | +31.6% | +100.0% | -2.8% |
Valuation Metrics
INTC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 52.1x trailing earnings, MRVL trades at a 40% valuation discount to AVGO's 86.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, INTC's 49.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MRVL's 106.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.4B | $1.96T | $138.6B | $550.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12.4B | $2.00T | $140.4B | $582.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -246.17x | 86.49x | 52.12x | -1861.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 167.16x | 36.45x | 41.72x | 105.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.73x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 58.52x | 106.14x | 49.88x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 27.29x | 30.62x | 16.91x | 10.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 12.92x | 24.63x | 9.73x | 4.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 72.67x | 99.24x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
AVGO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AVGO delivers a 32.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-6 for AAOI. AAOI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AVGO's 0.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AVGO scores 8/9 vs AAOI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -6.1% | +32.9% | +19.4% | -2.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.8% | +14.9% | +12.6% | -1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -7.9% | +14.9% | +6.0% | -0.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.5% | +16.9% | +7.1% | -0.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.23x | 0.80x | 0.31x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$49M | $49.0B | $1.8B | $32.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $216M | $16.2B | $2.6B | $14.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $167M | $65.1B | $4.5B | $46.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -28.36x | 9.24x | 15.17x | 3.71x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AAOI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AAOI five years ago would be worth $207,850 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19,575 for INTC. Over the past 12 months, AAOI leads with a +1027.0% total return vs AVGO's +102.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AAOI at 3.5% vs INTC's 53.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +297.9% | +18.9% | +79.1% | +178.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1027.0% | +102.6% | +184.6% | +439.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8801.1% | +566.4% | +291.9% | +258.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1978.5% | +833.6% | +250.8% | +95.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1435.6% | +2897.3% | +1581.3% | +299.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.5% | +88.2% | +57.7% | +53.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AVGO and INTC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AVGO is the less volatile stock with a 1.96 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AAOI's 4.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. INTC currently trades 95.7% from its 52-week high vs AAOI's 82.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 4.13x | 1.96x | 2.21x | 2.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $191.87 | $437.68 | $175.79 | $114.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.56 | $198.43 | $53.78 | $18.97 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.1% | +94.3% | +91.0% | +95.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.9 | 68.0 | 78.5 | 85.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 12.4M | 23.3M | 24.8M | 110.6M |
Analyst Outlook
AVGO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AAOI as "Buy", AVGO as "Buy", MRVL as "Buy", INTC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 7.6% upside for AVGO (target: $444) vs -70.8% for AAOI (target: $46). For income investors, AVGO offers the higher dividend yield at 0.56% vs MRVL's 0.15%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $46.00 | $443.72 | $129.52 | $77.18 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 58 | 72 | 84 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.6% | +0.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 16 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.30 | $0.24 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% | +1.5% | 0.0% |
AVGO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). INTC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
AAOI vs AVGO vs MRVL vs INTC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AAOI or AVGO or MRVL or INTC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Applied Optoelectronics, Inc.
(AAOI) is the stronger pick with 82. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 5% for Intel Corporation (INTC). Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) offers the better valuation at 52. 1x trailing P/E (41. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. (AAOI) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AAOI or AVGO or MRVL or INTC?
On trailing P/E, Marvell Technology, Inc.
(MRVL) is the cheapest at 52. 1x versus Broadcom Inc. at 86. 5x. On forward P/E, Broadcom Inc. is actually cheaper at 36. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AAOI or AVGO or MRVL or INTC?
Over the past 5 years, Applied Optoelectronics, Inc.
(AAOI) delivered a total return of +1978%, compared to +95. 8% for Intel Corporation (INTC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AVGO returned +29. 0% versus INTC's +299. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AAOI or AVGO or MRVL or INTC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Broadcom Inc.
(AVGO) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 96β versus Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. 's 4. 13β — meaning AAOI is approximately 110% more volatile than AVGO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. (AAOI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 80% for Broadcom Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AAOI or AVGO or MRVL or INTC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Applied Optoelectronics, Inc.
(AAOI) is pulling ahead at 82. 8% versus -0. 5% for Intel Corporation (INTC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Marvell Technology, Inc. grew EPS 401. 0% year-over-year, compared to 85. 8% for Applied Optoelectronics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AAOI leads at 26. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AAOI or AVGO or MRVL or INTC?
Broadcom Inc.
(AVGO) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 2% net margin versus -8. 4% for Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AVGO leads at 39. 9% versus -12. 0% for AAOI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AVGO leads at 67. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AAOI or AVGO or MRVL or INTC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Broadcom Inc.
(AVGO) trades at 36. 5x forward P/E versus 167. 2x for Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. — 130. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AVGO: 7. 6% to $443. 72.
08Which pays a better dividend — AAOI or AVGO or MRVL or INTC?
In this comparison, AVGO (0.
6% yield), MRVL (0. 1% yield) pay a dividend. AAOI, INTC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AAOI or AVGO or MRVL or INTC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Marvell Technology, Inc.
(MRVL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1581% 10Y return). Intel Corporation (INTC) carries a higher beta of 2. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MRVL: +1581%, INTC: +299. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AAOI and AVGO and MRVL and INTC?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AAOI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AVGO is a mega-cap high-growth stock; MRVL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; INTC is a large-cap quality compounder stock. AVGO pays a dividend while AAOI, MRVL, INTC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.