Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AAP vs LKQ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Parts
AAP vs LKQ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Auto - Parts |
| Market Cap | $3.48B | $7.34B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8.57B | $13.92B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $44M | $517M |
| Gross Margin | 43.2% | 37.7% |
| Operating Margin | 1.9% | 7.3% |
| Forward P/E | 21.0x | 9.5x |
| Total Debt | $5.22B | $5.06B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.12B | $319M |
AAP vs LKQ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advance Auto Parts,… (AAP) | 100 | 41.7 | -58.3% |
| LKQ Corporation (LKQ) | 100 | 104.8 | +4.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AAP vs LKQ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AAP is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +87.8% vs LKQ's -23.9%
LKQ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.90, yield 4.2%
- Rev growth -3.1%, EPS growth -10.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.8%
- 4.2% 10Y total return vs AAP's -51.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -3.1% revenue growth vs AAP's -5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.5x vs 21.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.7% margin vs AAP's 0.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.90 vs AAP's 1.42, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs AAP's 1.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +87.8% vs LKQ's -23.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.3% ROA vs AAP's 0.4%, ROIC 7.2% vs 2.9% |
AAP vs LKQ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AAP vs LKQ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LKQ leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LKQ is the larger business by revenue, generating $13.9B annually — 1.6x AAP's $8.6B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.7% (LKQ) to 0.5% (AAP).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8.6B | $13.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $433M | $1.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $44M | $517M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$298M | $808M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.2% | +37.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.9% | +7.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.5% | +3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.5% | +5.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.2% | +0.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +101.4% | -52.3% |
Valuation Metrics
LKQ leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.2x trailing earnings, LKQ trades at a 85% valuation discount to AAP's 79.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LKQ's 8.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AAP's 12.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.5B | $7.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.6B | $12.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 79.55x | 12.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.98x | 9.53x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 5.16x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.90x | 8.09x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.41x | 0.53x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.60x | 1.12x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.67x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LKQ leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LKQ delivers a 7.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $2 for AAP. LKQ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.77x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AAP's 2.38x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LKQ scores 5/9 vs AAP's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.0% | +7.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +3.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.9% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.3% | +9.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.38x | 0.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.1B | $4.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.1B | $319M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.2B | $5.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.16x | 4.50x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LKQ leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LKQ five years ago would be worth $6,902 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,506 for AAP. Over the past 12 months, AAP leads with a +87.8% total return vs LKQ's -23.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LKQ at -17.3% vs AAP's -21.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +50.6% | -3.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +87.8% | -23.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -51.4% | -43.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -64.9% | -31.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -51.2% | +4.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -21.4% | -17.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AAP and LKQ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LKQ is the less volatile stock with a 0.90 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AAP's 1.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AAP currently trades 83.0% from its 52-week high vs LKQ's 67.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.42x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $70.00 | $42.67 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $30.84 | $27.23 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.0% | +67.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.4 | 37.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 2.5M |
Analyst Outlook
LKQ leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AAP as "Hold" and LKQ as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 34.4% upside for LKQ (target: $39) vs 1.2% for AAP (target: $59). For income investors, LKQ offers the higher dividend yield at 4.21% vs AAP's 1.70%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $58.75 | $38.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 44 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.7% | +4.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.99 | $1.21 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.2% |
LKQ leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
AAP vs LKQ: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AAP or LKQ a better buy right now?
For growth investors, LKQ Corporation (LKQ) is the stronger pick with -3.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Advance Auto Parts, Inc. (AAP). LKQ Corporation (LKQ) offers the better valuation at 12. 2x trailing P/E (9. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate LKQ Corporation (LKQ) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AAP or LKQ?
On trailing P/E, LKQ Corporation (LKQ) is the cheapest at 12.
2x versus Advance Auto Parts, Inc. at 79. 5x. On forward P/E, LKQ Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AAP or LKQ?
Over the past 5 years, LKQ Corporation (LKQ) delivered a total return of -31.
0%, compared to -64. 9% for Advance Auto Parts, Inc. (AAP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LKQ returned +4. 2% versus AAP's -51. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AAP or LKQ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), LKQ Corporation (LKQ) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
90β versus Advance Auto Parts, Inc. 's 1. 42β — meaning AAP is approximately 59% more volatile than LKQ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, LKQ Corporation (LKQ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 77% versus 2% for Advance Auto Parts, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AAP or LKQ?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), LKQ Corporation (LKQ) is pulling ahead at -3.
1% versus -5. 4% for Advance Auto Parts, Inc. (AAP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Advance Auto Parts, Inc. grew EPS 113. 0% year-over-year, compared to -10. 6% for LKQ Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, LKQ leads at 2. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AAP or LKQ?
LKQ Corporation (LKQ) is the more profitable company, earning 4.
4% net margin versus 0. 5% for Advance Auto Parts, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LKQ leads at 7. 8% versus 1. 9% for AAP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AAP leads at 43. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AAP or LKQ more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, LKQ Corporation (LKQ) trades at 9.
5x forward P/E versus 21. 0x for Advance Auto Parts, Inc. — 11. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LKQ: 34. 4% to $38. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — AAP or LKQ?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
LKQ Corporation (LKQ) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 1. 7% for Advance Auto Parts, Inc. (AAP).
09Is AAP or LKQ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, LKQ Corporation (LKQ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
90), 4. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LKQ: +4. 2%, AAP: -51. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AAP and LKQ?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AAP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LKQ is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.