Gold
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AAUC vs CDE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gold
AAUC vs CDE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gold | Gold |
| Market Cap | $3.64B | $11.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.33B | $2.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-52M | $799M |
| Gross Margin | 38.0% | 35.4% |
| Operating Margin | 27.4% | 39.4% |
| Forward P/E | 5.1x | 9.1x |
| Total Debt | $170M | $365M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $480M | $554M |
AAUC vs CDE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allied Gold Corpora… (AAUC) | 100 | 422.8 | +322.8% |
| Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) | 100 | 295.0 | +195.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AAUC vs CDE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AAUC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.18
- 323.4% 10Y total return vs CDE's 149.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.18, Low D/E 33.6%, current ratio 0.77x
CDE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 96.4%, EPS growth 5.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.1%
- 96.4% revenue growth vs AAUC's 82.3%
- 31.1% margin vs AAUC's -3.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 96.4% revenue growth vs AAUC's 82.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.1x vs 9.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 31.1% margin vs AAUC's -3.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.18 vs CDE's 1.81 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +216.1% vs AAUC's +130.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.2% ROA vs AAUC's -3.1%, ROIC 23.5% vs 106.6% |
AAUC vs CDE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AAUC vs CDE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CDE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CDE is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.6B annually — 1.9x AAUC's $1.3B. CDE is the more profitable business, keeping 31.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AAUC's -3.9%. On growth, AAUC holds the edge at +150.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $2.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $437M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$52M | $799M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $91M | $915M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.0% | +35.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.4% | +39.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.9% | +31.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | +35.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +150.4% | +137.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -130.5% | +4.9% |
Valuation Metrics
AAUC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, AAUC's 7.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CDE's 11.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.6B | $11.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.3B | $11.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -64.82x | 20.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 5.06x | 9.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.39x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.61x | 11.19x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.73x | 5.62x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.66x | 3.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 44.42x | 17.48x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — AAUC and CDE each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CDE delivers a 15.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-12 for AAUC. CDE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AAUC's 0.34x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -11.6% | +15.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.1% | +11.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +106.6% | +23.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +37.0% | +23.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.34x | 0.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$310M | -$188M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $480M | $554M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $170M | $365M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 26.04x | 47.33x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — AAUC and CDE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AAUC five years ago would be worth $42,337 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19,605 for CDE. Over the past 12 months, CDE leads with a +216.1% total return vs AAUC's +130.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CDE at 72.6% vs AAUC's 61.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +26.2% | +3.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +130.2% | +216.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +323.4% | +414.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +323.4% | +96.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +323.4% | +149.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +61.8% | +72.6% |
Risk & Volatility
AAUC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AAUC is the less volatile stock with a 0.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CDE's 1.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AAUC currently trades 90.6% from its 52-week high vs CDE's 65.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.18x | 1.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.20 | $27.77 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.20 | $5.55 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.6% | +65.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.6 | 49.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 316K | 22.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $29.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% |
AAUC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). CDE leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
AAUC vs CDE: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AAUC or CDE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Coeur Mining, Inc.
(CDE) is the stronger pick with 96. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 82. 3% for Allied Gold Corporation (AAUC). Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) offers the better valuation at 20. 1x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AAUC or CDE?
On forward P/E, Allied Gold Corporation is actually cheaper at 5.
1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AAUC or CDE?
Over the past 5 years, Allied Gold Corporation (AAUC) delivered a total return of +323.
4%, compared to +96. 0% for Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AAUC returned +323. 4% versus CDE's +149. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AAUC or CDE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Allied Gold Corporation (AAUC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
18β versus Coeur Mining, Inc. 's 1. 81β — meaning CDE is approximately 897% more volatile than AAUC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 34% for Allied Gold Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AAUC or CDE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coeur Mining, Inc.
(CDE) is pulling ahead at 96. 4% versus 82. 3% for Allied Gold Corporation (AAUC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Coeur Mining, Inc. grew EPS 500. 0% year-over-year, compared to 63. 4% for Allied Gold Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CDE leads at 38. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AAUC or CDE?
Coeur Mining, Inc.
(CDE) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 3% net margin versus -3. 9% for Allied Gold Corporation — meaning it keeps 28. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CDE leads at 36. 3% versus 27. 4% for AAUC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CDE leads at 39. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AAUC or CDE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Allied Gold Corporation (AAUC) trades at 5.
1x forward P/E versus 9. 1x for Coeur Mining, Inc. — 4. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — AAUC or CDE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is AAUC or CDE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Allied Gold Corporation (AAUC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
18), +323. 4% 10Y return). Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) carries a higher beta of 1. 81 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AAUC: +323. 4%, CDE: +149. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AAUC and CDE?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.