Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ABM vs KELYA vs MAN vs CTAS vs RHI

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ABM
ABM Industries Incorporated

Specialty Business Services

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.36B
5Y Perf.+30.8%
KELYA
Kelly Services, Inc.

Staffing & Employment Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$355M
5Y Perf.-34.2%
MAN
ManpowerGroup Inc.

Staffing & Employment Services

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.38B
5Y Perf.-56.8%
CTAS
Cintas Corporation

Specialty Business Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$67.28B
5Y Perf.+169.3%
RHI
Robert Half International Inc.

Staffing & Employment Services

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.73B
5Y Perf.-46.7%

ABM vs KELYA vs MAN vs CTAS vs RHI — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ABM logoABM
KELYA logoKELYA
MAN logoMAN
CTAS logoCTAS
RHI logoRHI
IndustrySpecialty Business ServicesStaffing & Employment ServicesStaffing & Employment ServicesSpecialty Business ServicesStaffing & Employment Services
Market Cap$2.36B$355M$1.38B$67.28B$2.73B
Revenue (TTM)$8.87B$3.09B$17.96B$10.79B$5.38B
Net Income (TTM)$158M$-266M$-13M$1.90B$133M
Gross Margin11.5%26.3%16.7%50.2%36.8%
Operating Margin3.7%-2.8%0.8%23.0%1.4%
Forward P/E10.2x11.2x8.1x34.1x20.5x
Total Debt$1.69B$159M$2.39B$2.65B$421M
Cash & Equiv.$104M$33M$871M$264M$464M

ABM vs KELYA vs MAN vs CTAS vs RHILong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ABM
KELYA
MAN
CTAS
RHI
StockMay 20May 26Return
ABM Industries Inco… (ABM)100130.8+30.8%
Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA)10065.8-34.2%
ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN)10043.2-56.8%
Cintas Corporation (CTAS)100269.3+169.3%
Robert Half Interna… (RHI)10053.3-46.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ABM vs KELYA vs MAN vs CTAS vs RHI

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CTAS leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. ABM Industries Incorporated is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and recent price momentum and sentiment. RHI also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ABM
ABM Industries Incorporated
The Value Pick

ABM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.

  • PEG 0.04 vs CTAS's 2.04
  • Lower P/E (10.2x vs 20.5x)
  • -18.6% vs RHI's -35.2%
Best for: valuation efficiency
KELYA
Kelly Services, Inc.
The Income Angle

KELYA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: industrials exposure
MAN
ManpowerGroup Inc.
The Income Angle

Among these 5 stocks, MAN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: industrials exposure
CTAS
Cintas Corporation
The Growth Play

CTAS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 7.7%, EPS growth 16.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.6%
  • 6.7% 10Y total return vs ABM's 47.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.51, Low D/E 56.7%, current ratio 2.09x
  • Beta 0.51, yield 0.9%, current ratio 2.09x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
RHI
Robert Half International Inc.
The Income Pick

RHI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 22 yrs, beta 0.91, yield 8.8%
  • 8.8% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs ABM's 2.6%
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCTAS logoCTAS7.7% revenue growth vs RHI's -7.2%
ValueABM logoABMLower P/E (10.2x vs 20.5x)
Quality / MarginsCTAS logoCTAS17.6% margin vs KELYA's -8.6%
Stability / SafetyCTAS logoCTASBeta 0.51 vs KELYA's 0.96
DividendsRHI logoRHI8.8% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs ABM's 2.6%
Momentum (1Y)ABM logoABM-18.6% vs RHI's -35.2%
Efficiency (ROA)CTAS logoCTAS18.7% ROA vs KELYA's -11.3%, ROIC 25.8% vs -4.0%

ABM vs KELYA vs MAN vs CTAS vs RHI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ABMABM Industries Incorporated
FY 2024
Janitorial
64.8%$5.1B
Facility Services
14.8%$1.2B
Building And Energy Solutions
10.2%$809M
Parking
10.2%$805M
KELYAKelly Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Science, Engineering & Technology
55.1%$1.2B
Education
44.9%$1.0B
MANManpowerGroup Inc.
FY 2024
StaffingandInterim
87.5%$15.7B
Outcome-BasedSolutionsandConsulting
7.0%$1.3B
PermanentRecruitment
2.7%$492M
Other
2.7%$482M
Franchise
0.1%$14M
CTASCintas Corporation
FY 2025
Uniform Rental and Facility Services
77.1%$8.0B
First Aid and Safety Services
11.8%$1.2B
Fire Protection Services
7.9%$817M
Uniform Direct Sales
3.2%$329M
RHIRobert Half International Inc.
FY 2025
Contract Talent Solutions
83.4%$2.2B
Permanent Placement Staffing
16.6%$440M

ABM vs KELYA vs MAN vs CTAS vs RHI — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCTASLAGGINGRHI

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CTAS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

MAN is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.0B annually — 5.8x KELYA's $3.1B. CTAS is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KELYA's -8.6%. On growth, CTAS holds the edge at +9.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricABM logoABMABM Industries In…KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…MAN logoMANManpowerGroup Inc.CTAS logoCTASCintas CorporationRHI logoRHIRobert Half Inter…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$8.9B$3.1B$18.0B$10.8B$5.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$431M-$54M$236M$2.9B$150M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$158M-$266M-$13M$1.9B$133M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$327M$66M-$161M$1.8B$267M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+11.5%+26.3%+16.7%+50.2%+36.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+3.7%-2.8%+0.8%+23.0%+1.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+1.8%-8.6%-0.1%+17.6%+2.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+3.7%+2.1%-0.9%+16.5%+5.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+6.1%-100.0%+7.1%+9.3%-5.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-7.2%-2.1%+36.2%+11.0%-39.6%
CTAS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

MAN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 15.5x trailing earnings, ABM trades at a 59% valuation discount to CTAS's 37.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ABM offers better value at 0.05x vs CTAS's 2.27x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricABM logoABMABM Industries In…KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…MAN logoMANManpowerGroup Inc.CTAS logoCTASCintas CorporationRHI logoRHIRobert Half Inter…
Market CapShares × price$2.4B$355M$1.4B$67.3B$2.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.9B$481M$2.9B$69.7B$2.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS15.52x-1.36x-102.90x37.95x20.32x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.15x11.15x8.12x34.12x20.48x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.05x2.27x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.16x8.94x24.41x21.27x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.27x0.08x0.08x6.51x0.51x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.41x0.35x0.67x14.62x2.13x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF15.19x3.11x38.29x10.25x
MAN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CTAS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

CTAS delivers a 42.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $43 in annual profit, vs $-25 for KELYA. KELYA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MAN's 1.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CTAS scores 9/9 vs MAN's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricABM logoABMABM Industries In…KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…MAN logoMANManpowerGroup Inc.CTAS logoCTASCintas CorporationRHI logoRHIRobert Half Inter…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+8.8%-24.6%-0.6%+42.6%+10.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+3.0%-11.3%-0.1%+18.7%+4.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+7.5%-4.0%+5.6%+25.8%+4.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+8.2%-4.3%+6.2%+29.8%+5.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–965194
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.95x0.16x1.16x0.57x0.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$1.6B$126M$1.5B$2.4B-$43M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$104M$33M$871M$264M$464M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.7B$159M$2.4B$2.7B$421M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense3.25x-12.07x1.98x24.61x
CTAS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CTAS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CTAS five years ago would be worth $19,239 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,449 for MAN. Over the past 12 months, ABM leads with a -18.6% total return vs RHI's -35.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CTAS at 14.2% vs RHI's -20.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricABM logoABMABM Industries In…KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…MAN logoMANManpowerGroup Inc.CTAS logoCTASCintas CorporationRHI logoRHIRobert Half Inter…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-4.5%+15.1%-0.7%-9.4%+1.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-18.6%-18.8%-24.5%-21.5%-35.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+2.0%-33.1%-47.2%+49.1%-50.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-14.5%-57.3%-65.5%+92.4%-59.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+47.0%-32.0%-31.5%+671.6%+9.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+0.7%-12.6%-19.2%+14.2%-20.7%
CTAS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — ABM and CTAS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CTAS is the less volatile stock with a 0.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KELYA's 0.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ABM currently trades 75.9% from its 52-week high vs RHI's 55.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricABM logoABMABM Industries In…KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…MAN logoMANManpowerGroup Inc.CTAS logoCTASCintas CorporationRHI logoRHIRobert Half Inter…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.71x0.96x0.89x0.51x0.91x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$52.94$14.94$47.34$229.24$48.54
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$36.96$7.98$25.15$165.46$21.84
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+75.9%+66.1%+63.0%+72.8%+55.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10055.859.653.739.554.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded513K364K1.1M2.1M2.9M
Evenly matched — ABM and CTAS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — ABM and RHI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: ABM as "Hold", KELYA as "Buy", MAN as "Hold", CTAS as "Hold", RHI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 52.0% upside for KELYA (target: $15) vs 24.4% for ABM (target: $50). For income investors, RHI offers the higher dividend yield at 8.79% vs CTAS's 0.89%.

MetricABM logoABMABM Industries In…KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…MAN logoMANManpowerGroup Inc.CTAS logoCTASCintas CorporationRHI logoRHIRobert Half Inter…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyHoldHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$50.00$15.00$37.86$223.40$40.67
# AnalystsCovering analysts115293025
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.6%+3.2%+4.8%+0.9%+8.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises3650322
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.05$0.31$1.43$1.49$2.37
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+5.2%+3.5%+2.8%+1.4%+3.4%
Evenly matched — ABM and RHI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

CTAS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MAN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallCintas Corporation (CTAS)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ABM vs KELYA vs MAN vs CTAS vs RHI: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ABM or KELYA or MAN or CTAS or RHI a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Cintas Corporation (CTAS) is the stronger pick with 7.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 2% for Robert Half International Inc. (RHI). ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (10. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ABM or KELYA or MAN or CTAS or RHI?

On trailing P/E, ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) is the cheapest at 15.

5x versus Cintas Corporation at 37. 9x. On forward P/E, ManpowerGroup Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: ABM Industries Incorporated wins at 0. 04x versus Cintas Corporation's 2. 04x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ABM or KELYA or MAN or CTAS or RHI?

Over the past 5 years, Cintas Corporation (CTAS) delivered a total return of +92.

4%, compared to -65. 5% for ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CTAS returned +671. 6% versus KELYA's -32. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ABM or KELYA or MAN or CTAS or RHI?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cintas Corporation (CTAS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

51β versus Kelly Services, Inc. 's 0. 96β — meaning KELYA is approximately 89% more volatile than CTAS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 116% for ManpowerGroup Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ABM or KELYA or MAN or CTAS or RHI?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cintas Corporation (CTAS) is pulling ahead at 7.

7% versus -7. 2% for Robert Half International Inc. (RHI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ABM Industries Incorporated grew EPS 102. 3% year-over-year, compared to -427. 4% for Kelly Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CTAS leads at 9. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ABM or KELYA or MAN or CTAS or RHI?

Cintas Corporation (CTAS) is the more profitable company, earning 17.

5% net margin versus -6. 0% for Kelly Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CTAS leads at 22. 8% versus -1. 6% for KELYA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CTAS leads at 50. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ABM or KELYA or MAN or CTAS or RHI more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 04x versus Cintas Corporation's 2. 04x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN) trades at 8. 1x forward P/E versus 34. 1x for Cintas Corporation — 26. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KELYA: 52. 0% to $15. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ABM or KELYA or MAN or CTAS or RHI?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Robert Half International Inc. (RHI) offers the highest yield at 8. 8%, versus 0. 9% for Cintas Corporation (CTAS).

09

Is ABM or KELYA or MAN or CTAS or RHI better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Cintas Corporation (CTAS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

51), 0. 9% yield, +671. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CTAS: +671. 6%, KELYA: -32. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ABM and KELYA and MAN and CTAS and RHI?

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: ABM is a small-cap deep-value stock; KELYA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MAN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CTAS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; RHI is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ABM

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

KELYA

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 15%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.2%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MAN

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CTAS

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RHI

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 22%
  • Dividend Yield > 3.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ABM and KELYA and MAN and CTAS and RHI on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ABM: 6.1% · KELYA: -100.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.