REIT - Mortgage
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ABR vs BXMT vs RC vs TPVG vs ARI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
Asset Management
REIT - Mortgage
ABR vs BXMT vs RC vs TPVG vs ARI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage | Asset Management | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $1.57B | $3.23B | $324M | $222M | $1.46B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $638M | $1.54B | $-9M | $97M | $709M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $194M | $104M | $-311M | $49M | $127M |
| Gross Margin | 84.9% | 62.6% | 100.0% | 83.5% | 66.2% |
| Operating Margin | 71.7% | 58.3% | — | 77.9% | 56.0% |
| Forward P/E | 11.0x | 12.0x | — | 5.9x | 12.7x |
| Total Debt | $10.04B | $16.16B | $6.04B | $469M | $7.92B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $504M | $453M | $144M | $20M | $140M |
ABR vs BXMT vs RC vs TPVG vs ARI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arbor Realty Trust,… (ABR) | 100 | 95.0 | -5.0% |
| Blackstone Mortgage… (BXMT) | 100 | 81.1 | -18.9% |
| Ready Capital Corpo… (RC) | 100 | 34.1 | -65.9% |
| TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG) | 100 | 54.7 | -45.3% |
| Apollo Commercial R… (ARI) | 100 | 133.9 | +33.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ABR vs BXMT vs RC vs TPVG vs ARI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ABR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 1.03, yield 24.0%
- 205.8% 10Y total return vs ARI's 64.1%
- Beta 1.03, yield 24.0%, current ratio 3.53x
- 24.0% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs RC's 60.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
BXMT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, RC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
TPVG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and value.
- 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs RC's -93.0%
- Better valuation composite
- 50.6% margin vs RC's -15.9%
- 6.2% ROA vs RC's -3.7%
ARI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 1.3%, EPS growth 183.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.60, current ratio 0.30x
- PEG 0.09 vs TPVG's 5.86
- Beta 0.60 vs RC's 1.17
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs RC's -93.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 50.6% margin vs RC's -15.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.60 vs RC's 1.17 | |
| Dividends | 24.0% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs RC's 60.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +27.1% vs RC's -48.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.2% ROA vs RC's -3.7% |
ABR vs BXMT vs RC vs TPVG vs ARI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ABR vs BXMT vs RC vs TPVG vs ARI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TPVG leads in 2 of 6 categories
ARI leads 2 • ABR leads 0 • BXMT leads 0 • RC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TPVG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BXMT and RC operate at a comparable scale, with $1.5B and -$9M in trailing revenue. TPVG is the more profitable business, keeping 50.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RC's -15.9%. On growth, ABR holds the edge at +88.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $638M | $1.5B | -$9M | $97M | $709M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $510M | $948M | -$95M | $76M | $410M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $194M | $104M | -$311M | $49M | $127M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $436M | $335M | $366M | $37M | $40M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +84.9% | +62.6% | +100.0% | +83.5% | +66.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +71.7% | +58.3% | — | +77.9% | +56.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +30.4% | +6.7% | -15.9% | +50.6% | +17.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +68.3% | +21.8% | -187.2% | -58.7% | +5.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +88.5% | +4.0% | -69.8% | — | -0.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -28.6% | — | -86.2% | +2.1% | 0.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — RC and TPVG and ARI each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.5x trailing earnings, TPVG trades at a 85% valuation discount to BXMT's 29.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ARI offers better value at 0.09x vs TPVG's 4.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $3.2B | $324M | $222M | $1.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11.1B | $18.9B | $6.2B | $671M | $9.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 6.78x | 29.88x | -0.76x | 4.49x | 13.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.00x | 11.96x | — | 5.94x | 12.74x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 4.43x | 0.09x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 24.07x | 16.35x | — | 8.86x | 19.43x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.50x | 2.12x | 11.83x | 2.28x | 2.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.52x | 0.93x | 0.18x | 0.62x | 0.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.39x | 11.69x | — | — | 34.60x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TPVG leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TPVG delivers a 14.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-17 for RC. TPVG carries lower financial leverage with a 1.33x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BXMT's 4.61x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ABR scores 6/9 vs RC's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.2% | +2.9% | -16.6% | +14.0% | +6.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.4% | +0.5% | -3.7% | +6.2% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.3% | +4.3% | — | +7.2% | +4.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.0% | +11.3% | — | +9.4% | +5.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.19x | 4.61x | 3.12x | 1.33x | 4.27x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $9.5B | $15.7B | $5.9B | $449M | $7.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $504M | $453M | $144M | $20M | $140M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10.0B | $16.2B | $6.0B | $469M | $7.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.48x | 1.11x | — | 2.86x | 1.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ARI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARI five years ago would be worth $11,365 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,503 for RC. Over the past 12 months, ARI leads with a +27.1% total return vs RC's -48.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARI at 15.1% vs RC's -23.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.4% | +0.6% | -6.1% | -14.0% | +14.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -10.0% | +11.1% | -48.9% | +9.4% | +27.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.5% | +45.7% | -55.6% | -4.6% | +52.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -12.4% | -3.3% | -45.0% | -23.0% | +13.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +205.8% | +53.4% | +5.5% | +87.5% | +64.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.4% | +13.4% | -23.7% | -1.5% | +15.1% |
Risk & Volatility
ARI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ARI is the less volatile stock with a 0.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RC's 1.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ARI currently trades 98.0% from its 52-week high vs RC's 42.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.03x | 0.74x | 1.17x | 0.83x | 0.60x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.58 | $20.67 | $4.75 | $7.53 | $11.24 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.11 | $17.67 | $1.51 | $4.48 | $9.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +63.6% | +92.5% | +42.1% | +72.8% | +98.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.0 | 40.4 | 54.7 | 60.7 | 54.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.2M | 1.4M | 2.1M | 491K | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ABR and RC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ABR as "Buy", BXMT as "Hold", RC as "Buy", TPVG as "Hold", ARI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 63.3% upside for TPVG (target: $9) vs 0.0% for ABR (target: $8). For income investors, RC offers the higher dividend yield at 60.44% vs ARI's 9.23%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.00 | — | $2.50 | $8.95 | $12.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 18 | 16 | 12 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +24.0% | +9.9% | +60.4% | — | +9.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.92 | $1.89 | $1.21 | — | $1.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.7% | +3.4% | +25.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
TPVG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ARI leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
ABR vs BXMT vs RC vs TPVG vs ARI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ABR or BXMT or RC or TPVG or ARI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the stronger pick with 36. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -93. 0% for Ready Capital Corporation (RC). TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the better valuation at 4. 5x trailing P/E (5. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. (ABR) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ABR or BXMT or RC or TPVG or ARI?
On trailing P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the cheapest at 4. 5x versus Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. at 29. 9x. On forward P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. is actually cheaper at 5. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc. wins at 0. 09x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 5. 86x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ABR or BXMT or RC or TPVG or ARI?
Over the past 5 years, Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc.
(ARI) delivered a total return of +13. 6%, compared to -45. 0% for Ready Capital Corporation (RC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ABR returned +205. 8% versus RC's +5. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ABR or BXMT or RC or TPVG or ARI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc.
(ARI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 60β versus Ready Capital Corporation's 1. 17β — meaning RC is approximately 96% more volatile than ARI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 133% versus 5% for Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ABR or BXMT or RC or TPVG or ARI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is pulling ahead at 36. 6% versus -93. 0% for Ready Capital Corporation (RC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc. grew EPS 183. 5% year-over-year, compared to -217. 9% for Ready Capital Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, BXMT leads at 4. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ABR or BXMT or RC or TPVG or ARI?
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 6% net margin versus -1593. 0% for Ready Capital Corporation — meaning it keeps 50. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TPVG leads at 77. 9% versus 0. 0% for RC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RC leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ABR or BXMT or RC or TPVG or ARI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc. (ARI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 09x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 5. 86x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) trades at 5. 9x forward P/E versus 12. 7x for Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc. — 6. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TPVG: 63. 3% to $8. 95.
08Which pays a better dividend — ABR or BXMT or RC or TPVG or ARI?
In this comparison, RC (60.
4% yield), ABR (24. 0% yield), BXMT (9. 9% yield), ARI (9. 2% yield) pay a dividend. TPVG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ABR or BXMT or RC or TPVG or ARI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc.
(ARI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 60), 9. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ARI: +64. 1%, TPVG: +87. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ABR and BXMT and RC and TPVG and ARI?
These companies operate in different sectors (ABR (Real Estate) and BXMT (Real Estate) and RC (Real Estate) and TPVG (Financial Services) and ARI (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ABR is a small-cap deep-value stock; BXMT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; RC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock; ARI is a small-cap deep-value stock. ABR, BXMT, RC, ARI pay a dividend while TPVG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.