REIT - Mortgage
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ABR vs TPVG vs BXMT vs HRZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
REIT - Mortgage
Asset Management
ABR vs TPVG vs BXMT vs HRZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Mortgage | Asset Management | REIT - Mortgage | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $1.60B | $243M | $3.23B | $199M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $638M | $97M | $1.54B | $40M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $194M | $-12M | $104M | $28M |
| Gross Margin | 84.9% | 83.5% | 62.6% | 18.0% |
| Operating Margin | 71.7% | 77.9% | 58.3% | -4.0% |
| Forward P/E | 11.2x | 6.5x | 12.0x | 6.1x |
| Total Debt | $10.04B | $469M | $16.16B | $473M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $504M | $20M | $453M | $106M |
ABR vs TPVG vs BXMT vs HRZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arbor Realty Trust,… (ABR) | 100 | 97.0 | -3.0% |
| TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG) | 100 | 59.8 | -40.2% |
| Blackstone Mortgage… (BXMT) | 100 | 81.2 | -18.8% |
| Horizon Technology … (HRZN) | 100 | 41.4 | -58.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ABR vs TPVG vs BXMT vs HRZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ABR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 197.3% 10Y total return vs TPVG's 93.3%
- 23.5% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs HRZN's 27.8%
TPVG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for bank quality.
- NIM 7.4% vs HRZN's 7.1%
- 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs BXMT's -14.0%
- 50.6% margin vs HRZN's -6.6%
- +19.3% vs HRZN's -23.2%
BXMT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
HRZN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.70, yield 27.8%
- Rev growth 17.9%, EPS growth 7.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.70, current ratio 1.24x
- PEG 0.26 vs TPVG's 6.41
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs BXMT's -14.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.1x vs 12.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 50.6% margin vs HRZN's -6.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.70 vs ABR's 1.03, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 23.5% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs HRZN's 27.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +19.3% vs HRZN's -23.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.6% ROA vs TPVG's -1.5%, ROIC -0.2% vs 7.2% |
ABR vs TPVG vs BXMT vs HRZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ABR vs TPVG vs BXMT vs HRZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ABR leads in 1 of 6 categories
HRZN leads 1 • BXMT leads 1 • TPVG leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BXMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 38.4x HRZN's $40M. TPVG is the more profitable business, keeping 50.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HRZN's -6.6%. On growth, ABR holds the edge at +88.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $638M | $97M | $1.5B | $40M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $510M | -$22M | $948M | $19M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $194M | -$12M | $104M | $28M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $436M | $35M | $335M | $67M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +84.9% | +83.5% | +62.6% | +18.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +71.7% | +77.9% | +58.3% | -4.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +30.4% | +50.6% | +6.7% | -6.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +68.3% | -58.7% | +21.8% | +141.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +88.5% | — | +4.0% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -28.6% | -2.3% | — | -29.6% |
Valuation Metrics
HRZN leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.3x trailing earnings, HRZN trades at a 86% valuation discount to BXMT's 29.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HRZN offers better value at 0.18x vs TPVG's 4.84x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $243M | $3.2B | $199M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11.1B | $691M | $18.9B | $567M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 6.92x | 4.91x | 29.92x | 4.30x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.23x | 6.50x | 11.98x | 6.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.84x | — | 0.18x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 24.14x | 9.13x | 16.35x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.55x | 2.50x | 2.12x | 4.97x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.53x | 0.68x | 0.93x | 0.60x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.46x | — | 11.71x | 3.51x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — TPVG and BXMT and HRZN each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HRZN delivers a 9.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-3 for TPVG. TPVG carries lower financial leverage with a 1.33x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BXMT's 4.61x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ABR scores 6/9 vs HRZN's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.2% | -3.4% | +2.9% | +9.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.4% | -1.5% | +0.5% | +3.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.3% | +7.2% | +4.3% | -0.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.0% | +9.4% | +11.3% | -0.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.19x | 1.33x | 4.61x | 1.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $9.5B | $449M | $15.7B | $368M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $504M | $20M | $453M | $106M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10.0B | $469M | $16.2B | $473M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.48x | -1.02x | 1.11x | 0.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BXMT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BXMT five years ago would be worth $9,591 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,724 for HRZN. Over the past 12 months, TPVG leads with a +19.3% total return vs HRZN's -23.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BXMT at 14.0% vs HRZN's -10.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.5% | -6.3% | +0.7% | -26.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -10.2% | +19.3% | +12.1% | -23.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.8% | -3.4% | +48.1% | -27.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.3% | -13.5% | -4.1% | -32.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +197.3% | +93.3% | +50.5% | +52.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.6% | -1.2% | +14.0% | -10.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BXMT and HRZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HRZN is the less volatile stock with a 0.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ABR's 1.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BXMT currently trades 92.6% from its 52-week high vs HRZN's 53.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.03x | 0.83x | 0.74x | 0.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.58 | $7.53 | $20.67 | $8.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.11 | $4.48 | $17.67 | $3.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.9% | +79.5% | +92.6% | +53.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.5 | 58.3 | 47.5 | 58.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.2M | 504K | 1.4M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ABR and HRZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ABR as "Buy", TPVG as "Hold", BXMT as "Hold", HRZN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 49.4% upside for TPVG (target: $9) vs -2.1% for ABR (target: $8). For income investors, HRZN offers the higher dividend yield at 27.80% vs BXMT's 9.86%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.00 | $8.95 | — | $6.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 12 | 18 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +23.5% | +17.1% | +9.9% | +27.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.92 | $1.02 | $1.89 | $1.25 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.7% | 0.0% | +3.4% | 0.0% |
ABR leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). HRZN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
ABR vs TPVG vs BXMT vs HRZN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ABR or TPVG or BXMT or HRZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the stronger pick with 36. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 0% for Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. (BXMT). Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) offers the better valuation at 4. 3x trailing P/E (6. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. (ABR) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ABR or TPVG or BXMT or HRZN?
On trailing P/E, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) is the cheapest at 4.
3x versus Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. at 29. 9x. On forward P/E, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation is actually cheaper at 6. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Horizon Technology Finance Corporation wins at 0. 26x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 6. 41x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ABR or TPVG or BXMT or HRZN?
Over the past 5 years, Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc.
(BXMT) delivered a total return of -4. 1%, compared to -32. 8% for Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ABR returned +197. 3% versus BXMT's +50. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ABR or TPVG or BXMT or HRZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
70β versus Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. 's 1. 03β — meaning ABR is approximately 47% more volatile than HRZN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 133% versus 5% for Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ABR or TPVG or BXMT or HRZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is pulling ahead at 36. 6% versus -14. 0% for Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. (BXMT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Horizon Technology Finance Corporation grew EPS 756. 3% year-over-year, compared to -32. 6% for Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BXMT leads at 4. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ABR or TPVG or BXMT or HRZN?
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 6% net margin versus -6. 6% for Horizon Technology Finance Corporation — meaning it keeps 50. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TPVG leads at 77. 9% versus -4. 0% for HRZN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ABR leads at 90. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ABR or TPVG or BXMT or HRZN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 6. 41x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) trades at 6. 1x forward P/E versus 12. 0x for Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. — 5. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TPVG: 49. 4% to $8. 95.
08Which pays a better dividend — ABR or TPVG or BXMT or HRZN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) offers the highest yield at 27. 8%, versus 9. 9% for Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. (BXMT).
09Is ABR or TPVG or BXMT or HRZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
70), 27. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HRZN: +52. 9%, ABR: +197. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ABR and TPVG and BXMT and HRZN?
These companies operate in different sectors (ABR (Real Estate) and TPVG (Financial Services) and BXMT (Real Estate) and HRZN (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ABR is a small-cap deep-value stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock; BXMT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HRZN is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Financial Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 8%
- Dividend Yield > 11.1%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.