Business Equipment & Supplies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ACCO vs SON vs PKG vs IP vs SEE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaging & Containers
Packaging & Containers
Packaging & Containers
Packaging & Containers
ACCO vs SON vs PKG vs IP vs SEE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Business Equipment & Supplies | Packaging & Containers | Packaging & Containers | Packaging & Containers | Packaging & Containers |
| Market Cap | $375M | $5.10B | $19.93B | $17.52B | $6.21B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.55B | $7.49B | $8.99B | $24.97B | $5.36B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $74M | $1.04B | $773M | $-3.35B | $506M |
| Gross Margin | 30.7% | 20.9% | 21.0% | 27.8% | 29.8% |
| Operating Margin | 7.9% | 8.7% | 13.6% | -10.5% | 13.5% |
| Forward P/E | 4.8x | 8.8x | 21.7x | 21.8x | 12.4x |
| Total Debt | $921M | $4.85B | $4.36B | $10.80B | $4.10B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $64M | $378M | $529M | $1.15B | $344M |
ACCO vs SON vs PKG vs IP vs SEE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACCO Brands Corpora… (ACCO) | 100 | 65.6 | -34.4% |
| Sonoco Products Com… (SON) | 100 | 99.8 | -0.2% |
| Packaging Corporati… (PKG) | 100 | 220.3 | +120.3% |
| International Paper… (IP) | 100 | 102.6 | +2.6% |
| Sealed Air Corporat… (SEE) | 100 | 131.0 | +31.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ACCO vs SON vs PKG vs IP vs SEE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ACCO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (4.8x vs 12.4x)
- 7.1% yield, vs SON's 4.0%
SON carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 30 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 4.0%
- Rev growth 41.7%, EPS growth 141.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.7%
- PEG 0.62 vs SEE's 9.73
- 41.7% revenue growth vs ACCO's -8.5%
PKG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 299.8% 10Y total return vs SON's 48.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 94.9%, current ratio 3.17x
- Beta 0.76, yield 2.2%, current ratio 3.17x
Among these 5 stocks, IP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
SEE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability and momentum.
- Beta 0.32 vs ACCO's 1.33
- +44.2% vs IP's -19.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 41.7% revenue growth vs ACCO's -8.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.8x vs 12.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.8% margin vs IP's -13.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.32 vs ACCO's 1.33 | |
| Dividends | 7.1% yield, vs SON's 4.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.2% vs IP's -19.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.0% ROA vs IP's -8.5%, ROIC 6.2% vs -11.3% |
ACCO vs SON vs PKG vs IP vs SEE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ACCO vs SON vs PKG vs IP vs SEE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ACCO leads in 1 of 6 categories
PKG leads 1 • SEE leads 1 • SON leads 0 • IP leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — PKG and SEE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IP is the larger business by revenue, generating $25.0B annually — 16.1x ACCO's $1.6B. SON is the more profitable business, keeping 13.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IP's -13.4%. On growth, PKG holds the edge at +10.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.6B | $7.5B | $9.0B | $25.0B | $5.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $177M | $1.2B | $1.9B | $154M | $965M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $74M | $1.0B | $773M | -$3.4B | $506M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $49M | $266M | $729M | $553M | $459M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.7% | +20.9% | +21.0% | +27.8% | +29.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.9% | +8.7% | +13.6% | -10.5% | +13.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | +13.8% | +8.6% | -13.4% | +9.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.2% | +3.6% | +8.1% | +2.2% | +8.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.3% | -1.9% | +10.1% | +1.2% | +2.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.4% | +23.6% | -53.9% | +145.8% | +16.4% |
Valuation Metrics
ACCO leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.2x trailing earnings, ACCO trades at a 65% valuation discount to PKG's 26.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SON offers better value at 0.92x vs SEE's 9.66x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $375M | $5.1B | $19.9B | $17.5B | $6.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $9.6B | $23.8B | $27.2B | $10.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.23x | 12.99x | 26.04x | -4.93x | 12.29x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 4.83x | 8.84x | 21.68x | 21.80x | 12.38x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.92x | 2.15x | — | 9.66x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.80x | 7.77x | 12.46x | 1293.97x | 14.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.25x | 0.68x | 2.22x | 0.70x | 1.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.57x | 1.42x | 4.35x | 1.18x | 5.02x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.37x | 12.99x | 27.36x | — | 13.54x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — ACCO and PKG each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SEE delivers a 48.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $-20 for IP. IP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.73x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SEE's 3.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACCO scores 7/9 vs IP's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.3% | +30.0% | +16.7% | -20.4% | +48.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.2% | +9.0% | +7.7% | -8.5% | +7.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.5% | +6.2% | +12.6% | -11.3% | +11.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.1% | +8.3% | +14.2% | -11.6% | +14.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.39x | 1.34x | 0.95x | 0.73x | 3.31x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $856M | $4.5B | $3.8B | $9.7B | $3.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $64M | $378M | $529M | $1.1B | $344M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $921M | $4.9B | $4.4B | $10.8B | $4.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.50x | 4.60x | 13.99x | -8.89x | 1.95x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PKG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PKG five years ago would be worth $16,155 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,075 for ACCO. Over the past 12 months, SEE leads with a +44.2% total return vs IP's -19.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PKG at 20.6% vs ACCO's -1.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.1% | +17.7% | +6.4% | -15.5% | +2.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.8% | +21.9% | +26.9% | -19.6% | +44.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -4.4% | -3.2% | +75.3% | +20.7% | +2.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.3% | -9.7% | +61.6% | -26.6% | -19.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.1% | +48.6% | +299.8% | +29.2% | +4.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.5% | -1.1% | +20.6% | +6.5% | +0.8% |
Risk & Volatility
SEE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SEE is the less volatile stock with a 0.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACCO's 1.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SEE currently trades 95.2% from its 52-week high vs IP's 58.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.33x | 0.53x | 0.76x | 1.20x | 0.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.29 | $58.43 | $249.51 | $56.13 | $44.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.81 | $38.65 | $178.32 | $29.45 | $28.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.6% | +88.5% | +89.5% | +58.9% | +95.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 74.3 | 50.8 | 62.4 | 46.2 | 64.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 1.1M | 918K | 6.8M | 3.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ACCO and SON each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ACCO as "Hold", SON as "Buy", PKG as "Hold", IP as "Buy", SEE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 97.0% upside for ACCO (target: $8) vs 3.2% for SEE (target: $44). For income investors, ACCO offers the higher dividend yield at 7.07% vs SEE's 1.92%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.00 | $59.00 | $245.00 | $46.40 | $43.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 21 | 26 | 29 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.1% | +4.0% | +2.2% | +5.6% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 30 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.29 | $2.09 | $5.02 | $1.85 | $0.81 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.0% | +0.2% | +0.8% | +0.4% | 0.0% |
ACCO leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). PKG leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
ACCO vs SON vs PKG vs IP vs SEE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ACCO or SON or PKG or IP or SEE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sonoco Products Company (SON) is the stronger pick with 41.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 5% for ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO). ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E (4. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sonoco Products Company (SON) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ACCO or SON or PKG or IP or SEE?
On trailing P/E, ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO) is the cheapest at 9.
2x versus Packaging Corporation of America at 26. 0x. On forward P/E, ACCO Brands Corporation is actually cheaper at 4. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Sonoco Products Company wins at 0. 62x versus Sealed Air Corporation's 9. 73x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ACCO or SON or PKG or IP or SEE?
Over the past 5 years, Packaging Corporation of America (PKG) delivered a total return of +61.
6%, compared to -39. 3% for ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PKG returned +299. 8% versus ACCO's -35. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ACCO or SON or PKG or IP or SEE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
32β versus ACCO Brands Corporation's 1. 33β — meaning ACCO is approximately 310% more volatile than SEE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, International Paper Company (IP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 73% versus 3% for Sealed Air Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ACCO or SON or PKG or IP or SEE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sonoco Products Company (SON) is pulling ahead at 41.
7% versus -8. 5% for ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ACCO Brands Corporation grew EPS 141. 5% year-over-year, compared to -527. 4% for International Paper Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, SON leads at 8. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ACCO or SON or PKG or IP or SEE?
Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the more profitable company, earning 9.
4% net margin versus -14. 1% for International Paper Company — meaning it keeps 9. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PKG leads at 14. 0% versus -11. 3% for IP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACCO leads at 29. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ACCO or SON or PKG or IP or SEE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Sonoco Products Company (SON) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 62x versus Sealed Air Corporation's 9. 73x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO) trades at 4. 8x forward P/E versus 21. 8x for International Paper Company — 17. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ACCO: 97. 0% to $8. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ACCO or SON or PKG or IP or SEE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO) offers the highest yield at 7. 1%, versus 1. 9% for Sealed Air Corporation (SEE).
09Is ACCO or SON or PKG or IP or SEE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
32), 1. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SEE: +4. 4%, ACCO: -35. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ACCO and SON and PKG and IP and SEE?
These companies operate in different sectors (ACCO (Industrials) and SON (Consumer Cyclical) and PKG (Consumer Cyclical) and IP (Consumer Cyclical) and SEE (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ACCO is a small-cap deep-value stock; SON is a small-cap high-growth stock; PKG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; IP is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SEE is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.