Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ACDC vs PUMP vs LBRT vs NINE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ACDC
ProFrac Holding Corp.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.29B
5Y Perf.-60.9%
PUMP
ProPetro Holding Corp.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.93B
5Y Perf.+20.8%
LBRT
Liberty Energy Inc.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.26B
5Y Perf.+99.6%
NINE
Nine Energy Service, Inc.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$429M
5Y Perf.+216.3%

ACDC vs PUMP vs LBRT vs NINE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ACDC logoACDC
PUMP logoPUMP
LBRT logoLBRT
NINE logoNINE
IndustryOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesOil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$1.29B$1.93B$5.26B$429M
Revenue (TTM)$1.94B$1.18B$4.05B$571M
Net Income (TTM)$-367M$-12M$150M$-41M
Gross Margin3.7%8.3%10.7%11.5%
Operating Margin-8.5%-1.1%1.5%2.0%
Forward P/E2021.8x3568.1x
Total Debt$1.14B$249M$873M$383M
Cash & Equiv.$23M$91M$28M$18M

ACDC vs PUMP vs LBRT vs NINELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ACDC
PUMP
LBRT
NINE
StockMay 22May 26Return
ProFrac Holding Cor… (ACDC)10039.1-60.9%
ProPetro Holding Co… (PUMP)100120.8+20.8%
Liberty Energy Inc. (LBRT)100199.6+99.6%
Nine Energy Service… (NINE)100316.3+216.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ACDC vs PUMP vs LBRT vs NINE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: LBRT leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. ProFrac Holding Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. PUMP and NINE also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ACDC
ProFrac Holding Corp.
The Defensive Choice

ACDC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability is your priority.

  • Beta 0.83 vs NINE's 3.21
Best for: stability
PUMP
ProPetro Holding Corp.
The Defensive Pick

PUMP is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.12, Low D/E 30.0%, current ratio 1.29x
  • Beta 1.12, current ratio 1.29x
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
LBRT
Liberty Energy Inc.
The Income Pick

LBRT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.31, yield 1.0%
  • Rev growth -7.2%, EPS growth -52.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.2%
  • 98.8% 10Y total return vs PUMP's 8.8%
  • -7.2% revenue growth vs NINE's -100.0%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
NINE
Nine Energy Service, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

NINE is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +12.2% vs ACDC's +56.4%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthLBRT logoLBRT-7.2% revenue growth vs NINE's -100.0%
ValuePUMP logoPUMPBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsLBRT logoLBRT3.7% margin vs ACDC's -18.9%
Stability / SafetyACDC logoACDCBeta 0.83 vs NINE's 3.21
DividendsLBRT logoLBRT1.0% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)NINE logoNINE+12.2% vs ACDC's +56.4%
Efficiency (ROA)LBRT logoLBRT4.0% ROA vs ACDC's -13.1%, ROIC 2.3% vs -4.6%

ACDC vs PUMP vs LBRT vs NINE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ACDCProFrac Holding Corp.
FY 2025
Service
87.2%$1.7B
Product
12.8%$249M
PUMPProPetro Holding Corp.
FY 2025
Power Generation
100.0%$2M
LBRTLiberty Energy Inc.
FY 2025
Service, Other
100.0%$600,000
NINENine Energy Service, Inc.
FY 2025
Service Revenue
38.4%$431M
Cement
18.8%$211M
Tool Revenue
11.6%$131M
Tools
11.6%$131M
Wireline
10.3%$116M
Coiled Tubing
9.3%$104M

ACDC vs PUMP vs LBRT vs NINE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLLBRTLAGGINGNINE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

LBRT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

LBRT is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.0B annually — 7.1x NINE's $571M. LBRT is the more profitable business, keeping 3.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACDC's -18.9%. On growth, LBRT holds the edge at +4.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricACDC logoACDCProFrac Holding C…PUMP logoPUMPProPetro Holding …LBRT logoLBRTLiberty Energy In…NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.9B$1.2B$4.0B$571M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$251M$154M$549M$61M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$367M-$12M$150M-$41M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$20M-$11M-$193M-$7M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+3.7%+8.3%+10.7%+11.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-8.5%-1.1%+1.5%+2.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-18.9%-1.1%+3.7%-7.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+1.0%-0.9%-4.8%-1.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-4.0%-24.7%+4.5%-4.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-33.3%-134.2%+16.7%-34.6%
LBRT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ACDC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 36.5x trailing earnings, LBRT trades at a 98% valuation discount to PUMP's 2021.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ACDC's 8.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NINE's 337.9x.

MetricACDC logoACDCProFrac Holding C…PUMP logoPUMPProPetro Holding …LBRT logoLBRTLiberty Energy In…NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…
Market CapShares × price$1.3B$1.9B$5.3B$429M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$2.4B$2.1B$6.1B$793M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-3.10x2021.79x36.48x-7.92x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.3568.13x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.54x10.81x10.50x337.94x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.66x1.52x1.31x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.30x2.00x2.59x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF65.81x45.52x373.05x
ACDC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

LBRT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

LBRT delivers a 7.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-38 for ACDC. PUMP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ACDC's 1.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PUMP scores 5/9 vs NINE's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricACDC logoACDCProFrac Holding C…PUMP logoPUMPProPetro Holding …LBRT logoLBRTLiberty Energy In…NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-38.2%-1.4%+7.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-13.1%-1.0%+4.0%-11.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital-4.6%+1.4%+2.3%+0.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-6.2%+1.8%+3.0%+0.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–93541
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.30x0.30x0.42x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$1.1B$158M$846M$364M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$23M$91M$28M$18M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.1B$249M$873M$383M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-1.22x-0.86x5.24x0.24x
LBRT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — LBRT and NINE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NINE five years ago would be worth $49,749 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,937 for ACDC. Over the past 12 months, NINE leads with a +1219.8% total return vs ACDC's +56.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LBRT at 39.7% vs ACDC's -11.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricACDC logoACDCProFrac Holding C…PUMP logoPUMPProPetro Holding …LBRT logoLBRTLiberty Energy In…NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+76.5%+60.6%+72.5%+2696.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+56.4%+199.8%+193.5%+1219.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-30.1%+136.1%+172.7%+151.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-60.6%+50.8%+155.3%+397.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-60.6%+8.8%+98.8%-62.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-11.3%+33.2%+39.7%+36.0%
Evenly matched — LBRT and NINE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — ACDC and NINE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ACDC is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NINE's 3.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NINE currently trades 96.8% from its 52-week high vs ACDC's 66.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricACDC logoACDCProFrac Holding C…PUMP logoPUMPProPetro Holding …LBRT logoLBRTLiberty Energy In…NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.83x1.12x1.31x3.21x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$10.70$18.50$34.41$10.23
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.08$4.51$9.90$0.00
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+66.6%+85.2%+94.3%+96.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10063.859.366.486.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.5M3.5M4.2M138K
Evenly matched — ACDC and NINE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

LBRT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: ACDC as "Hold", PUMP as "Buy", LBRT as "Buy", NINE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 81.8% upside for NINE (target: $18) vs -15.8% for ACDC (target: $6). LBRT is the only dividend payer here at 1.01% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricACDC logoACDCProFrac Holding C…PUMP logoPUMPProPetro Holding …LBRT logoLBRTLiberty Energy In…NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$6.00$14.75$34.00$18.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts630199
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises41
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.33
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.5%0.0%
LBRT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

LBRT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ACDC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallLiberty Energy Inc. (LBRT)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ACDC vs PUMP vs LBRT vs NINE: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ACDC or PUMP or LBRT or NINE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Liberty Energy Inc.

(LBRT) is the stronger pick with -7. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE). Liberty Energy Inc. (LBRT) offers the better valuation at 36. 5x trailing P/E (3568. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) a "Buy" — based on 30 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ACDC or PUMP or LBRT or NINE?

On trailing P/E, Liberty Energy Inc.

(LBRT) is the cheapest at 36. 5x versus ProPetro Holding Corp. at 2021. 8x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ACDC or PUMP or LBRT or NINE?

Over the past 5 years, Nine Energy Service, Inc.

(NINE) delivered a total return of +397. 5%, compared to -60. 6% for ProFrac Holding Corp. (ACDC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LBRT returned +98. 8% versus NINE's -62. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ACDC or PUMP or LBRT or NINE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ProFrac Holding Corp.

(ACDC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 83β versus Nine Energy Service, Inc. 's 3. 21β — meaning NINE is approximately 289% more volatile than ACDC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 130% for ProFrac Holding Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ACDC or PUMP or LBRT or NINE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Liberty Energy Inc.

(LBRT) is pulling ahead at -7. 2% versus -100. 0% for Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ProPetro Holding Corp. grew EPS 100. 6% year-over-year, compared to -66. 7% for ProFrac Holding Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PUMP leads at -0. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ACDC or PUMP or LBRT or NINE?

Liberty Energy Inc.

(LBRT) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 7% net margin versus -19. 0% for ProFrac Holding Corp. — meaning it keeps 3. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NINE leads at 2. 0% versus -6. 9% for ACDC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NINE leads at 11. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ACDC or PUMP or LBRT or NINE more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NINE: 81.

8% to $18. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ACDC or PUMP or LBRT or NINE?

In this comparison, LBRT (1.

0% yield) pays a dividend. ACDC, PUMP, NINE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is ACDC or PUMP or LBRT or NINE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Liberty Energy Inc.

(LBRT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 0% yield). Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE) carries a higher beta of 3. 21 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LBRT: +98. 8%, NINE: -62. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ACDC and PUMP and LBRT and NINE?

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

LBRT pays a dividend while ACDC, PUMP, NINE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ACDC

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PUMP

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LBRT

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NINE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ACDC and PUMP and LBRT and NINE on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ACDC: -4.0% · PUMP: -24.7%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.