REIT - Mortgage
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ADAM vs WELL vs VTR vs SACH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Mortgage
ADAM vs WELL vs VTR vs SACH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $789M | $149.25B | $41.15B | $53M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $806M | $11.63B | $6.13B | $38M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $149M | $1.43B | $260M | $6M |
| Gross Margin | 43.9% | 39.1% | -4.3% | 98.1% |
| Operating Margin | 17.1% | 4.4% | 13.4% | 42.0% |
| Forward P/E | 11.2x | 78.4x | 118.0x | 28.1x |
| Total Debt | $11.00B | $21.38B | $13.22B | $278M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $210M | $5.03B | $741M | $11M |
ADAM vs WELL vs VTR vs SACH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adamas Trust, Inc. (ADAM) | 100 | 104.8 | +4.8% |
| Welltower Inc. (WELL) | 100 | 420.4 | +320.4% |
| Ventas, Inc. (VTR) | 100 | 247.6 | +147.6% |
| Sachem Capital Corp. (SACH) | 100 | 38.1 | -61.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ADAM vs WELL vs VTR vs SACH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ADAM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 44.1%, EPS growth 196.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 80.0%
- 44.1% FFO/revenue growth vs SACH's -18.2%
- Lower P/E (11.2x vs 28.1x)
- 18.5% margin vs VTR's 4.2%
WELL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 223.1% 10Y total return vs VTR's 65.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.13, Low D/E 49.5%, current ratio 5.34x
- 1.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs SACH's 18.4%
- 2.3% ROA vs VTR's 1.0%, ROIC 0.5% vs 2.5%
VTR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.01, yield 2.1%
- Beta 0.01, yield 2.1%, current ratio 0.96x
- Beta 0.01 vs ADAM's 1.08, lower leverage
SACH lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 44.1% FFO/revenue growth vs SACH's -18.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.2x vs 28.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.5% margin vs VTR's 4.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs ADAM's 1.08, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs SACH's 18.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.7% vs VTR's +33.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.3% ROA vs VTR's 1.0%, ROIC 0.5% vs 2.5% |
ADAM vs WELL vs VTR vs SACH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ADAM vs WELL vs VTR vs SACH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SACH leads in 2 of 6 categories
ADAM leads 1 • WELL leads 1 • VTR leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SACH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WELL is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 307.2x SACH's $38M. ADAM is the more profitable business, keeping 18.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VTR's 4.2%. On growth, SACH holds the edge at +145.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $806M | $11.6B | $6.1B | $38M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $178M | $2.8B | $2.3B | $17M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $149M | $1.4B | $260M | $6M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $133M | $2.5B | $1.4B | $3M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.9% | +39.1% | -4.3% | +98.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +17.1% | +4.4% | +13.4% | +42.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.5% | +12.3% | +4.2% | +16.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.5% | +21.9% | +22.4% | +6.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +81.8% | +40.3% | +22.0% | +145.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +197.8% | +22.5% | 0.0% | -79.9% |
Valuation Metrics
ADAM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.9x trailing earnings, ADAM trades at a 95% valuation discount to VTR's 160.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SACH's 11.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WELL's 66.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $789M | $149.2B | $41.1B | $53M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11.6B | $165.6B | $53.6B | $320M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.93x | 153.25x | 160.26x | 28.06x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.19x | 78.42x | 118.01x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 65.25x | 66.40x | 24.31x | 11.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.98x | 13.99x | 7.05x | 1.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.56x | 3.35x | 3.18x | 0.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.27x | 52.41x | 31.25x | 21.11x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SACH leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ADAM delivers a 10.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $2 for VTR. WELL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.49x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ADAM's 7.69x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WELL scores 7/9 vs SACH's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.6% | +3.5% | +2.1% | +3.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.3% | +2.3% | +1.0% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.2% | +0.5% | +2.5% | +4.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.3% | +0.6% | +3.2% | +6.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 7.69x | 0.49x | 1.05x | 1.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $10.8B | $16.3B | $12.5B | $267M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $210M | $5.0B | $741M | $11M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11.0B | $21.4B | $13.2B | $278M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.30x | 0.26x | 1.40x | 1.25x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WELL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WELL five years ago would be worth $30,234 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,684 for SACH. Over the past 12 months, ADAM leads with a +46.7% total return vs VTR's +33.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WELL at 42.5% vs SACH's -16.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +20.3% | +14.3% | +12.6% | +10.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +46.7% | +42.7% | +33.9% | +34.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.6% | +189.5% | +94.2% | -42.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.0% | +202.3% | +74.8% | -43.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +24.5% | +223.1% | +65.0% | -5.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.0% | +42.5% | +24.8% | -16.8% |
Risk & Volatility
VTR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VTR is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ADAM's 1.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VTR currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs SACH's 81.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.08x | 0.13x | 0.01x | 0.44x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.32 | $219.59 | $88.50 | $1.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.16 | $142.65 | $61.76 | $0.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.6% | +97.0% | +97.8% | +81.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.9 | 60.2 | 56.2 | 58.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 751K | 2.6M | 3.4M | 157K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WELL and SACH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ADAM as "Buy", WELL as "Buy", VTR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 6.3% upside for WELL (target: $227) vs 4.9% for VTR (target: $91). For income investors, SACH offers the higher dividend yield at 18.42% vs WELL's 1.30%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $226.50 | $90.80 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 34 | 32 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +15.3% | +1.3% | +2.1% | +18.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.33 | $2.76 | $1.86 | $0.20 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SACH leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ADAM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
ADAM vs WELL vs VTR vs SACH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ADAM or WELL or VTR or SACH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Adamas Trust, Inc.
(ADAM) is the stronger pick with 44. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 2% for Sachem Capital Corp. (SACH). Adamas Trust, Inc. (ADAM) offers the better valuation at 7. 9x trailing P/E (11. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Adamas Trust, Inc. (ADAM) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ADAM or WELL or VTR or SACH?
On trailing P/E, Adamas Trust, Inc.
(ADAM) is the cheapest at 7. 9x versus Ventas, Inc. at 160. 3x. On forward P/E, Adamas Trust, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ADAM or WELL or VTR or SACH?
Over the past 5 years, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) delivered a total return of +202. 3%, compared to -43. 2% for Sachem Capital Corp. (SACH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WELL returned +223. 1% versus SACH's -5. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ADAM or WELL or VTR or SACH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ventas, Inc.
(VTR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 01β versus Adamas Trust, Inc. 's 1. 08β — meaning ADAM is approximately 11259% more volatile than VTR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Welltower Inc. (WELL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 49% versus 8% for Adamas Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ADAM or WELL or VTR or SACH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Adamas Trust, Inc.
(ADAM) is pulling ahead at 44. 1% versus -18. 2% for Sachem Capital Corp. (SACH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Adamas Trust, Inc. grew EPS 196. 5% year-over-year, compared to -11. 5% for Welltower Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ADAM leads at 80. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ADAM or WELL or VTR or SACH?
Adamas Trust, Inc.
(ADAM) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 5% net margin versus 4. 3% for Ventas, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SACH leads at 58. 8% versus 3. 3% for WELL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SACH leads at 97. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ADAM or WELL or VTR or SACH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Adamas Trust, Inc.
(ADAM) trades at 11. 2x forward P/E versus 118. 0x for Ventas, Inc. — 106. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WELL: 6. 3% to $226. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — ADAM or WELL or VTR or SACH?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Sachem Capital Corp. (SACH) offers the highest yield at 18. 4%, versus 1. 3% for Welltower Inc. (WELL).
09Is ADAM or WELL or VTR or SACH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ventas, Inc.
(VTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 01), 2. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VTR: +65. 0%, ADAM: +24. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ADAM and WELL and VTR and SACH?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ADAM is a small-cap high-growth stock; WELL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; VTR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SACH is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.