Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ADCT vs AIXI vs BBAI vs RCUS vs MGNX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Information Technology Services
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
ADCT vs AIXI vs BBAI vs RCUS vs MGNX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Software - Application | Information Technology Services | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $478M | $8M | $19.73B | $2.50B | $186M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $79M | $115M | $127M | $236M | $150M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-137M | $-53M | $-289M | $-369M | $-75M |
| Gross Margin | 90.7% | 64.3% | 25.8% | 90.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | -149.6% | -44.2% | -68.3% | -168.6% | -48.7% |
| Total Debt | $439M | $46M | $24M | $99M | $37M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $261M | $847K | $87M | $222M | $57M |
ADCT vs AIXI vs BBAI vs RCUS vs MGNX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADC Therapeutics S.… (ADCT) | 100 | 192.8 | +92.8% |
| Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) | 100 | 1.2 | -98.8% |
| BigBear.ai Holdings… (BBAI) | 100 | 170.9 | +70.9% |
| Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS) | 100 | 135.9 | +35.9% |
| MacroGenics, Inc. (MGNX) | 100 | 41.0 | -59.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ADCT vs AIXI vs BBAI vs RCUS vs MGNX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ADCT is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.89, current ratio 4.37x
AIXI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.94
- Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 52.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.3%
- 18.8% revenue growth vs BBAI's -19.3%
- -45.9% margin vs BBAI's -226.7%
Among these 5 stocks, BBAI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
RCUS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 45.9% 10Y total return vs BBAI's -57.6%
- +209.6% vs AIXI's -79.2%
MGNX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.93, Low D/E 66.1%, current ratio 5.10x
- -29.9% ROA vs AIXI's -65.3%, ROIC -18.8% vs -34.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.8% revenue growth vs BBAI's -19.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | -45.9% margin vs BBAI's -226.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.94 vs BBAI's 3.31 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +209.6% vs AIXI's -79.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -29.9% ROA vs AIXI's -65.3%, ROIC -18.8% vs -34.4% |
ADCT vs AIXI vs BBAI vs RCUS vs MGNX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ADCT vs AIXI vs BBAI vs RCUS vs MGNX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AIXI leads in 1 of 6 categories
BBAI leads 1 • RCUS leads 1 • ADCT leads 0 • MGNX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AIXI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RCUS is the larger business by revenue, generating $236M annually — 3.0x ADCT's $79M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -45.9% (AIXI) to -2.3% (BBAI). On growth, MGNX holds the edge at +132.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $79M | $115M | $127M | $236M | $150M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$117M | -$49M | -$75M | -$391M | -$73M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$137M | -$53M | -$289M | -$369M | -$75M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$115M | -$2M | -$56M | -$489M | -$83M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +90.7% | +64.3% | +25.8% | +90.7% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -149.6% | -44.2% | -68.3% | -168.6% | -48.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -173.0% | -45.9% | -2.3% | -156.4% | -49.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -144.7% | -2.0% | -44.3% | -2.1% | -55.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.5% | -64.9% | -0.9% | -39.3% | +132.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +41.7% | -29.9% | +52.0% | +10.5% | +8.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — AIXI and RCUS and MGNX each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $478M | $8M | $19.7B | $2.5B | $186M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $656M | $53M | $19.7B | $2.4B | $166M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.36x | -0.45x | -5.09x | -7.54x | -2.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.88x | 0.11x | 154.51x | 10.11x | 1.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — | 24.45x | 4.22x | 3.34x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BBAI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BBAI delivers a -50.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-51 in annual profit, vs $-120 for MGNX. BBAI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MGNX's 0.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ADCT scores 4/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | — | -50.7% | -69.0% | -120.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -44.7% | -65.3% | -35.3% | -35.3% | -29.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -34.4% | -19.5% | -64.1% | -18.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -43.8% | -3.4% | -19.6% | -42.1% | -34.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 0.04x | 0.16x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $178M | $45M | -$63M | -$123M | -$20M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $261M | $846,593 | $87M | $222M | $57M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $439M | $46M | $24M | $99M | $37M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.72x | -14.13x | -18.17x | -13.38x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RCUS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RCUS five years ago would be worth $8,143 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $138 for AIXI. Over the past 12 months, RCUS leads with a +209.6% total return vs AIXI's -79.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ADCT at 21.0% vs AIXI's -75.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.8% | +68.1% | -28.6% | +6.5% | +82.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +196.1% | -79.2% | +36.7% | +209.6% | +97.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +77.4% | -98.6% | +49.5% | +24.9% | -59.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.1% | -98.6% | -56.9% | -18.6% | -90.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.3% | -98.6% | -57.6% | +45.9% | -84.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.0% | -75.9% | +14.3% | +7.7% | -25.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AIXI and RCUS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AIXI is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BBAI's 3.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RCUS currently trades 86.3% from its 52-week high vs AIXI's 18.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.89x | 0.94x | 3.31x | 1.95x | 1.93x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.97 | $4.02 | $9.39 | $28.72 | $3.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.23 | $0.08 | $2.96 | $7.06 | $1.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.7% | +18.0% | +44.4% | +86.3% | +75.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.0 | 49.3 | 63.3 | 60.5 | 45.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 946K | 60.6M | 34.6M | 1.2M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ADCT as "Buy", BBAI as "Hold", RCUS as "Buy", MGNX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 104.1% upside for MGNX (target: $6) vs 21.0% for RCUS (target: $30).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.50 | — | $6.00 | $30.00 | $6.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | — | 4 | 18 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 2 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
AIXI leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). BBAI leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
ADCT vs AIXI vs BBAI vs RCUS vs MGNX: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ADCT or AIXI or BBAI or RCUS or MGNX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) is the stronger pick with 18.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 3% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI). Analysts rate ADC Therapeutics S. A. (ADCT) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ADCT or AIXI or BBAI or RCUS or MGNX?
Over the past 5 years, Arcus Biosciences, Inc.
(RCUS) delivered a total return of -18. 6%, compared to -98. 6% for Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RCUS returned +45. 9% versus AIXI's -98. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ADCT or AIXI or BBAI or RCUS or MGNX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
94β versus BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. 's 3. 31β — meaning BBAI is approximately 251% more volatile than AIXI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 66% for MacroGenics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ADCT or AIXI or BBAI or RCUS or MGNX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) is pulling ahead at 18.
8% versus -19. 3% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Xiao-I Corporation grew EPS 52. 7% year-over-year, compared to -10. 3% for MacroGenics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RCUS leads at 30. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ADCT or AIXI or BBAI or RCUS or MGNX?
Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) is the more profitable company, earning -20.
6% net margin versus -230. 2% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps -20. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AIXI leads at -18. 3% versus -156. 3% for RCUS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RCUS leads at 96. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ADCT or AIXI or BBAI or RCUS or MGNX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is ADCT or AIXI or BBAI or RCUS or MGNX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
94)). BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) carries a higher beta of 3. 31 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AIXI: -98. 6%, BBAI: -57. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ADCT and AIXI and BBAI and RCUS and MGNX?
These companies operate in different sectors (ADCT (Healthcare) and AIXI (Technology) and BBAI (Technology) and RCUS (Healthcare) and MGNX (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ADCT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AIXI is a small-cap high-growth stock; BBAI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; RCUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MGNX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.