Agricultural Farm Products
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ADM vs DE vs BG vs AGCO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural - Machinery
Agricultural Farm Products
Agricultural - Machinery
ADM vs DE vs BG vs AGCO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural Farm Products | Agricultural - Machinery | Agricultural Farm Products | Agricultural - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $37.60B | $160.38B | $24.46B | $8.71B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $80.61B | $45.88B | $80.54B | $10.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.08B | $4.08B | $686M | $771M |
| Gross Margin | 5.8% | 34.7% | 5.2% | 24.9% |
| Operating Margin | 1.5% | 17.0% | 2.4% | 6.9% |
| Forward P/E | 18.7x | 33.2x | 14.6x | 20.8x |
| Total Debt | $8.41B | $63.94B | $16.95B | $2.69B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.01B | $8.28B | $1.14B | $862M |
ADM vs DE vs BG vs AGCO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Archer-Daniels-Midl… (ADM) | 100 | 198.5 | +98.5% |
| Deere & Company (DE) | 100 | 388.9 | +288.9% |
| Bunge Global S.A. (BG) | 100 | 323.0 | +223.0% |
| AGCO Corporation (AGCO) | 100 | 217.7 | +117.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ADM vs DE vs BG vs AGCO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ADM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 31 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 2.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 36.5%, current ratio 11.20x
- Beta 0.12, yield 2.6%, current ratio 11.20x
- Beta 0.12 vs AGCO's 1.10, lower leverage
DE is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 6.8% 10Y total return vs AGCO's 181.1%
- 8.9% margin vs BG's 0.9%
BG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 32.4%, EPS growth -38.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.5%
- 32.4% revenue growth vs AGCO's -13.5%
- Lower P/E (14.6x vs 33.2x)
AGCO is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 1.80 vs DE's 2.03
- 6.3% ROA vs BG's 1.6%, ROIC 8.3% vs 3.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 32.4% revenue growth vs AGCO's -13.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.6x vs 33.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.9% margin vs BG's 0.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs AGCO's 1.10, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield, 31-year raise streak, vs DE's 1.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +65.7% vs DE's +25.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.3% ROA vs BG's 1.6%, ROIC 8.3% vs 3.3% |
ADM vs DE vs BG vs AGCO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ADM vs DE vs BG vs AGCO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DE leads in 2 of 6 categories
ADM leads 2 • AGCO leads 1 • BG leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ADM is the larger business by revenue, generating $80.6B annually — 7.8x AGCO's $10.4B. DE is the more profitable business, keeping 8.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BG's 0.9%. On growth, BG holds the edge at +87.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $80.6B | $45.9B | $80.5B | $10.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.0B | $9.5B | $2.8B | $963M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.1B | $4.1B | $686M | $771M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4.8B | $5.5B | $112M | $546M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +5.8% | +34.7% | +5.2% | +24.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.5% | +17.0% | +2.4% | +6.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | +8.9% | +0.9% | +7.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.0% | +12.0% | +0.1% | +5.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.6% | +16.3% | +87.8% | +14.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.6% | -24.1% | -76.4% | +4.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BG and AGCO each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.3x trailing earnings, AGCO trades at a 65% valuation discount to ADM's 35.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AGCO offers better value at 1.07x vs DE's 1.96x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $37.6B | $160.4B | $24.5B | $8.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $45.0B | $216.0B | $40.3B | $10.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 34.99x | 31.98x | 25.62x | 12.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.74x | 33.16x | 14.64x | 20.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.96x | — | 1.07x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.27x | 20.29x | 22.84x | 10.26x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.47x | 3.59x | 0.35x | 0.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.64x | 6.18x | 1.20x | 1.96x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.94x | 49.64x | — | 11.76x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AGCO leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AGCO delivers a 16.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $4 for BG. ADM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DE's 2.46x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AGCO scores 8/9 vs BG's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.7% | +15.5% | +4.3% | +16.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.8% | +3.9% | +1.6% | +6.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.3% | +7.7% | +3.3% | +8.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.2% | +11.4% | +4.5% | +9.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.37x | 2.46x | 0.97x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7.4B | $55.7B | $15.8B | $1.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.0B | $8.3B | $1.1B | $862M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8.4B | $63.9B | $17.0B | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.03x | 2.74x | 3.10x | 10.36x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DE five years ago would be worth $15,865 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,038 for AGCO. Over the past 12 months, ADM leads with a +65.7% total return vs DE's +25.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DE at 17.1% vs AGCO's 1.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +33.0% | +27.1% | +36.8% | +13.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +65.7% | +25.8% | +64.9% | +28.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.3% | +60.4% | +48.7% | +3.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +30.6% | +58.7% | +55.8% | -9.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +145.6% | +676.6% | +142.9% | +181.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.6% | +17.1% | +14.2% | +1.1% |
Risk & Volatility
ADM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ADM is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AGCO's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ADM currently trades 95.4% from its 52-week high vs AGCO's 83.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.12x | 0.56x | 0.25x | 1.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $81.75 | $674.19 | $133.93 | $143.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $46.81 | $433.00 | $71.60 | $93.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.4% | +87.8% | +94.1% | +83.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 73.4 | 48.1 | 61.2 | 44.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.7M | 1.2M | 1.7M | 698K |
Analyst Outlook
ADM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ADM as "Hold", DE as "Hold", BG as "Buy", AGCO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 15.0% upside for DE (target: $681) vs -23.1% for ADM (target: $60). For income investors, ADM offers the higher dividend yield at 2.61% vs AGCO's 0.97%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $60.00 | $680.54 | $133.67 | $127.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 36 | 46 | 25 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.6% | +1.1% | +2.2% | +1.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 31 | 8 | 5 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.04 | $6.33 | $2.76 | $1.16 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.7% | +2.3% | +2.9% |
DE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). ADM leads in 2 (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
ADM vs DE vs BG vs AGCO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ADM or DE or BG or AGCO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bunge Global S.
A. (BG) is the stronger pick with 32. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 5% for AGCO Corporation (AGCO). AGCO Corporation (AGCO) offers the better valuation at 12. 3x trailing P/E (20. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bunge Global S. A. (BG) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ADM or DE or BG or AGCO?
On trailing P/E, AGCO Corporation (AGCO) is the cheapest at 12.
3x versus Archer-Daniels-Midland Company at 35. 0x. On forward P/E, Bunge Global S. A. is actually cheaper at 14. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: AGCO Corporation wins at 1. 80x versus Deere & Company's 2. 03x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ADM or DE or BG or AGCO?
Over the past 5 years, Deere & Company (DE) delivered a total return of +58.
7%, compared to -9. 6% for AGCO Corporation (AGCO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DE returned +676. 6% versus BG's +142. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ADM or DE or BG or AGCO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
12β versus AGCO Corporation's 1. 10β — meaning AGCO is approximately 858% more volatile than ADM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 2% for Deere & Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ADM or DE or BG or AGCO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bunge Global S.
A. (BG) is pulling ahead at 32. 4% versus -13. 5% for AGCO Corporation (AGCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AGCO Corporation grew EPS 271. 4% year-over-year, compared to -38. 9% for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, BG leads at 1. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ADM or DE or BG or AGCO?
Deere & Company (DE) is the more profitable company, earning 11.
3% net margin versus 1. 2% for Bunge Global S. A. — meaning it keeps 11. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DE leads at 18. 8% versus 1. 5% for BG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DE leads at 36. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ADM or DE or BG or AGCO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, AGCO Corporation (AGCO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 80x versus Deere & Company's 2. 03x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Bunge Global S. A. (BG) trades at 14. 6x forward P/E versus 33. 2x for Deere & Company — 18. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DE: 15. 0% to $680. 54.
08Which pays a better dividend — ADM or DE or BG or AGCO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) offers the highest yield at 2. 6%, versus 1. 0% for AGCO Corporation (AGCO).
09Is ADM or DE or BG or AGCO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
12), 2. 6% yield, +145. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ADM: +145. 6%, AGCO: +181. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ADM and DE and BG and AGCO?
These companies operate in different sectors (ADM (Consumer Defensive) and DE (Industrials) and BG (Consumer Defensive) and AGCO (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ADM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; DE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AGCO is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Consumer Defensive
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 43%
- Dividend Yield > 0.8%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.