ADNT
Adient plc
Auto - Parts
Market Cap$1.71B
5Y Perf.+28.6%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
ADNT vs MGA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
MGA
Magna International Inc.
Auto - Parts
Market Cap$17.08B
5Y Perf.+45.2%
ADNT vs MGA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ADNT | MGA |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts |
| Market Cap | $1.71B | $17.08B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $14.94B | $42.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $59M | $829M |
| Gross Margin | 6.4% | 13.2% |
| Operating Margin | 3.0% | 6.0% |
| Forward P/E | 10.5x | 9.0x |
| Total Debt | $2.40B | $8.32B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $958M | $1.61B |
ADNT vs MGA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
ADNT
MGA
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adient plc (ADNT) | 100 | 128.6 | +28.6% |
| Magna International… (MGA) | 100 | 145.2 | +45.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ADNT vs MGA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: MGA leads in 7 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ADNT
Adient plc
The Value Angle
In this particular matchup, ADNT is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
MGA
Magna International Inc.
The Income Pick
MGA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 1.08, yield 3.2%
- Rev growth -0.2%, EPS growth -15.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.1%
- 88.0% 10Y total return vs ADNT's -51.8%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | MGA | -0.2% revenue growth vs ADNT's -1.0% |
| Value | MGA | Lower P/E (9.0x vs 10.5x) |
| Quality / Margins | MGA | 2.0% margin vs ADNT's 0.4% |
| Stability / Safety | MGA | Beta 1.08 vs ADNT's 1.43, lower leverage |
| Dividends | MGA | 3.2% yield; 16-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | MGA | +89.3% vs ADNT's +73.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MGA | 2.6% ROA vs ADNT's 0.7%, ROIC 8.6% vs 8.7% |
ADNT vs MGA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2018
FY 2025
ADNT vs MGA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLMGALAGGINGADNT
ADNTAdient plc
1leads
MGAMagna International I…
5leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs ADNTMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
MGA4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
ADNT5/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
MGA5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
MGA5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
MGA2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
MGA1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MGA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MGA is the larger business by revenue, generating $42.2B annually — 2.8x ADNT's $14.9B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 2.0% (MGA) to 0.4% (ADNT). On growth, ADNT holds the edge at +7.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ADNTAdient plc | MGAMagna Internation… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $14.9B | $42.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $688M | $4.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $59M | $829M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $272M | $2.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +6.4% | +13.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.0% | +6.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.4% | +2.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.8% | +5.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.0% | +3.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +108.5% | -100.5% |
MGA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
ADNT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ADNT's 4.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MGA's 6.2x.
| Metric | ADNTAdient plc | MGAMagna Internation… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $17.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.2B | $23.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.45x | 20.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.50x | 9.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 5.89x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.13x | 6.21x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.12x | 0.40x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.84x | 1.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.40x | 9.40x |
ADNT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MGA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MGA delivers a 6.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $3 for ADNT. MGA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.65x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ADNT's 1.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ADNT scores 6/9 vs MGA's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ADNTAdient plc | MGAMagna Internation… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.8% | +6.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.7% | +8.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.0% | +10.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.11x | 0.65x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.4B | $6.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $958M | $1.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.4B | $8.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.02x | 10.07x |
MGA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MGA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MGA five years ago would be worth $7,158 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,439 for ADNT. Over the past 12 months, MGA leads with a +89.3% total return vs ADNT's +73.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MGA at 7.0% vs ADNT's -15.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ADNTAdient plc | MGAMagna Internation… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.9% | +13.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +73.9% | +89.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.0% | +22.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -55.6% | -28.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -51.8% | +88.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -15.2% | +7.0% |
MGA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MGA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MGA is the less volatile stock with a 1.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ADNT's 1.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MGA currently trades 87.6% from its 52-week high vs ADNT's 80.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ADNTAdient plc | MGAMagna Internation… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.43x | 1.08x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $27.32 | $69.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.89 | $32.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.1% | +87.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.6 | 59.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 838K | 1.6M |
MGA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
MGA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ADNT as "Hold" and MGA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.5% upside for ADNT (target: $27) vs 7.1% for MGA (target: $66). MGA is the only dividend payer here at 3.20% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ADNTAdient plc | MGAMagna Internation… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $26.80 | $65.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 27 | 30 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.96 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.3% | +0.8% |
MGA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
MGA leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ADNT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
Best OverallMagna International Inc. (MGA)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
ADNT vs MGA: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ADNT or MGA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Magna International Inc.
(MGA) is the stronger pick with -0. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 0% for Adient plc (ADNT). Magna International Inc. (MGA) offers the better valuation at 20. 5x trailing P/E (9. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Magna International Inc. (MGA) a "Buy" — based on 30 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ADNT or MGA?
On forward P/E, Magna International Inc.
is actually cheaper at 9. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ADNT or MGA?
Over the past 5 years, Magna International Inc.
(MGA) delivered a total return of -28. 4%, compared to -55. 6% for Adient plc (ADNT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MGA returned +88. 0% versus ADNT's -51. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ADNT or MGA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Magna International Inc.
(MGA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 08β versus Adient plc's 1. 43β — meaning ADNT is approximately 32% more volatile than MGA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Magna International Inc. (MGA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 65% versus 111% for Adient plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ADNT or MGA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Magna International Inc.
(MGA) is pulling ahead at -0. 2% versus -1. 0% for Adient plc (ADNT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Magna International Inc. grew EPS -15. 1% year-over-year, compared to -1795. 0% for Adient plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, MGA leads at 4. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ADNT or MGA?
Magna International Inc.
(MGA) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 0% net margin versus -1. 9% for Adient plc — meaning it keeps 2. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MGA leads at 5. 0% versus 3. 0% for ADNT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MGA leads at 10. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ADNT or MGA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Magna International Inc.
(MGA) trades at 9. 0x forward P/E versus 10. 5x for Adient plc — 1. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ADNT: 22. 5% to $26. 80.
08Which pays a better dividend — ADNT or MGA?
In this comparison, MGA (3.
2% yield) pays a dividend. ADNT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ADNT or MGA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Magna International Inc.
(MGA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 08), 3. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MGA: +88. 0%, ADNT: -51. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ADNT and MGA?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ADNT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MGA is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. MGA pays a dividend while ADNT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(ADNT: 7.0% · MGA: 3.6%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.